World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jim J. Groombridge

Jim J. Groombridge

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
30
Citations
3225
World Ranking
8358
National Ranking
810

Jim J. Groombridge publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim J. Groombridge sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jim J. Groombridge D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim J. Groombridge sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim J. Groombridge is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and environmental science, with a notable emphasis on genetics and ecology subfields.

Their recent scholarly output includes several publications addressing topics related to conservation biology and genomic studies. Notable papers include:

  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? (2020, Conservation Letters)
  • Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue (2022, Conservation Biology)
  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented? (2020, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])
  • Genomic erosion in the assessment of species' extinction risk and recovery potential (2022, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])
  • Genetic Load and Adaptive Potential of a Recovered Avian Species that Narrowly Avoided Extinction (2023, Molecular Biology and Evolution)

Their frequent coauthors include Cock van Oosterhout, Hernán E. Morales, Vikash Tatayah, Kevin Ruhomaun, and M. Thomas P. Gilbert, reflecting collaborative efforts in related areas of study.

The scientist's works are published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) and Wellcome Open Research, with additional contributions to Endangered Species Research, Conservation Letters, and Conservation Biology. This range of publication outlets indicates active engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed research dissemination channels.

Groombridge's main fields of study comprise:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Environmental Science

They also focus on several subfields:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science
  • Ecological Modeling

The primary research topics associated with their work include:

  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Gut microbiota and health

Best Publications

  • ‘Ghost’ alleles of the Mauritius kestrel

    Jim J. Groombridge;Carl G. Jones;Michael William Bruford;Richard A. Nichols

  • How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented

    Friederike C. Bolam;Louise Mair;Marco Angelico;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks;Thomas M. Brooks

  • Seasonal variation in environmental DNA in relation to population size and environmental factors.

    Andrew S. Buxton;Jim J. Groombridge;Nurulhuda B. Zakaria;Richard A. Griffiths

  • Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands

    Diogo Veríssimo;Iain M Fraser;Jim J. Groombridge;Rachel M. Bristol

  • Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples

    Andrew S. Buxton;Jim J. Groombridge;Richard A. Griffiths

  • Sustaining genetic variation in a small population: evidence from the Mauritius kestrel

    Richard A. Nichols;Michael William Bruford;Jim J. Groombridge

  • Leadership and conservation effectiveness: finding a better way to lead

    Simon A. Black;Jim J. Groombridge;Carl G. Jones;Carl G. Jones

  • Improving supplementary feeding in species conservation.

    John G. Ewen;Leila Walker;Leila Walker;Stefano Canessa;Jim J. Groombridge

  • Is the detection of aquatic environmental DNA influenced by substrate type

    Andrew S. Buxton;Jim J. Groombridge;Richard A. Griffiths

  • Making the EU Legislation on Invasive Species a Conservation Success

    Simon Tollington;Anne Turbé;Wolfgang Rabitsch;Jim J. Groombridge

  • Tracking Viral Evolution During a Disease Outbreak: The Rapid and Complete Selective Sweep of a Circovirus in the Endangered Echo parakeet

    Samit Kundu;Christopher G. Faulkes;Andrew G. Greenwood;Carl G. Jones

  • An attempt to recover the Po'ouli by translocation and an appraisal of recovery strategy for bird species of extreme rarity

    Jim J. Groombridge;J. Gregory Massey;James C. Bruch;Trent R. Malcolm

  • Inbreeding depression and founder diversity among captive and free‐living populations of the endangered pink pigeon Columba mayeri

    Kirsty J. Swinnerton;Jim J. Groombridge;Carl G. Jones;Carl G. Jones;Robert W. Burn

  • Genetic Consequences of Reintroductions and Insights from Population History

    Jim J. Groombridge;Claire Raisin;Rachel Bristol;David S. Richardson

  • Beak and feather disease virus in wild and captive parrots: an analysis of geographic and taxonomic distribution and methodological trends.

    Deborah J. Fogell;Rowan O. Martin;Jim J. Groombridge

  • Invasion success of a global avian invader is explained by within-taxon niche structure and association with humans in the native range

    Diederik Strubbe;Hazel Jackson;Jim J. Groombridge;Erik Matthysen

  • Molecular phylogeny and morphological change in the Psittacula parakeets.

    Jim J. Groombridge;Carl G. Jones;Richard A. Nichols;Mark Carlton

  • Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue

    Unknown

  • A molecular phylogeny of African kestrels with reference to divergence across the Indian Ocean

    Jim J. Groombridge;Carl G. Jones;Michelle K. Bayes;Anthony J. van Zyl

  • Trade and conservation implications of new beak and feather disease virus detection in native and introduced parrots.

    Deborah J. Fogell;Deborah J. Fogell;Rowan O. Martin;Nancy Bunbury;Becki Lawson

  • Genomic erosion in the assessment of species extinction risk and recovery potential

    Unknown

  • Evaluating the demographic history of the Seychelles kestrel (Falco araea): Genetic evidence for recovery from a population bottleneck following minimal conservation management

    Jim J. Groombridge;Jim J. Groombridge;Deborah A. Dawson;Terry Burke;Robert Prys-Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl G. Jones
Carl G. Jones Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust
Richard A. Griffiths
Richard A. Griffiths University of Kent
Deborah A. Dawson
Deborah A. Dawson University of Sheffield
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
John G. Ewen
John G. Ewen Zoological Society of London
Michael William Bruford
Michael William Bruford Cardiff University
Diederik Strubbe
Diederik Strubbe Ghent University
Richard A. Nichols
Richard A. Nichols Queen Mary University of London
Alexander C. Lees
Alexander C. Lees Manchester Metropolitan University
Leonardo Ancillotto
Leonardo Ancillotto University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career pathways, and many students consider online degree options for added flexibility. If you’re keen on bridging science with healthcare, nursing programs offer rewarding alternatives. For example, many look into the psychiatric np salary to gauge the lucrative potential in advanced nursing roles.

Time commitment is a key concern for prospective students. If you’re wondering about efficient paths, understanding how long to become a nurse practitioner helps in making informed decisions. Accelerated options are also available, such as a 6 month rn to bsn program, ideal for those with an RN license aiming to advance quickly.

Additionally, bridge programs like the adn to np pathway offer a streamlined route for ADN-prepared nurses to pursue a Master’s degree. Exploring these online degree options can lead to interdisciplinary careers at the intersection of ecology, health, and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Jim J. Groombridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles