World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
9972
World Ranking
1449
National Ranking
36

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
10344
World Ranking
4513
National Ranking
244

Gleb Beliakov publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gleb Beliakov sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 295 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Gleb Beliakov D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gleb Beliakov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gleb Beliakov is affiliated with Deakin University in Australia and has contributed significantly to the fields of computer science, decision sciences, and mathematics. Their research spans several subfields including management science and operations research, statistics and probability, artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their main research topics include multi-criteria decision making, fuzzy systems and optimization, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, data management and algorithms, rough sets and fuzzy logic, optimization and mathematical programming, and chaos-based image and signal encryption.

Beliakov's recent papers cover a variety of subjects and publication venues:

  • "A Brief Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for E-Commerce Research," 2023, Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research
  • "Desynchronization Attacks Resilient Watermarking Method Based on Frequency Singular Value Coefficient Modification," 2021, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • "Knapsack problems with dependencies through non-additive measures and Choquet integral," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Random generation of k-interactive capacities," 2020, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
  • "Choquet integral optimisation with constraints and the buoyancy property for fuzzy measures," 2021, Information Sciences

Frequent co-authors of Beliakov include Jian-Zhang Wu, Simon James, Marek Gągolewski, Juan Baz, and Yong Xiang.

Beliakov has published extensively in several journals and venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems (11 publications)
  • IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (6 publications)
  • Information Sciences (4 publications)
  • Information Fusion (4 publications)
  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (4 publications)

They have also authored a book titled Choquet Capacities and Fuzzy Integrals, which is to be published by Springer Nature in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners

    Gleb Beliakov;Ana Pradera;Tomasa Calvo

  • A Practical Guide to Averaging Functions

    Gleb Beliakov;Humberto Bustince Sola;Tomasa Calvo Snchez

  • Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice

    Ronald R. Yager;Janusz Kacprzyk;Gleb Beliakov

  • On averaging operators for Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    G. Beliakov;H. Bustince;D. P. Goswami;U. K. Mukherjee

  • Generalized Bonferroni mean operators in multi-criteria aggregation

    Gleb Beliakov;Simon James;Juliana Mordelová;Tatiana Rückschlossová

  • Aggregation functions based on penalties

    Tomasa Calvo;Gleb Beliakov

  • Appropriate choice of aggregation operators in fuzzy decision support systems

    G. Beliakov;J. Warren

  • Robust Histogram Shape-Based Method for Image Watermarking

    Tianrui Zong;Yong Xiang;Iynkaran Natgunanathan;Song Guo

  • How to build aggregation operators from data

    Gleb Beliakov

  • Advances in Fuzzy Implication Functions

    Michal Baczynski;Gleb Beliakov;Humberto Bustince Sola;Ana Pradera

  • Learning Weights in the Generalized OWA Operators

    Gleb Beliakov

  • Construction of aggregation functions from data using linear programming

    Gleb Beliakov

  • Discriminating DDoS attack traffic from flash crowd through packet arrival patterns

    Theerasak Thapngam;Shui Yu;Wanlei Zhou;Gleb Beliakov

  • Protection of Privacy in Biometric Data

    Iynkaran Natgunanathan;Abid Mehmood;Yong Xiang;Gleb Beliakov

  • Weakly Monotonic Averaging Functions

    Tim Wilkin;Gleb Beliakov

  • Uncertainties with Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Fuzziness and lack of knowledge

    N. R. Pal;H. Bustince;M. Pagola;U. K. Mukherjee

  • A class of fuzzy multisets with a fixed number of memberships

    Benjamín Bedregal;Gleb Beliakov;Humberto Bustince;Tomasa Calvo

  • A review of the relationships between implication, negation and aggregation functions from the point of view of material implication

    A. Pradera;G. Beliakov;H. Bustince;B. De Baets

  • OWA Operators in Regression Problems

    R.R. Yager;G. Beliakov

  • Weakly Monotone Averaging Functions

    Tim Wilkin;Gleb Beliakov;Tomasa Calvo

Frequent Co-Authors

Radko Mesiar
Radko Mesiar Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
Javier Fernández
Javier Fernández Universidad Publica De Navarra
Humberto Bustince
Humberto Bustince Universidad Publica De Navarra
John Yearwood
John Yearwood Deakin University
Yong Xiang
Yong Xiang Deakin University
Miguel Pagola
Miguel Pagola Universidad Publica De Navarra
Benjamin Bedregal
Benjamin Bedregal Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Ronald R. Yager
Ronald R. Yager Iona University
Javier Montero
Javier Montero Complutense University of Madrid
Dale G. Nimmo
Dale G. Nimmo Charles Sturt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals pivot to business fields where quantitative skills are vital, such as through an mba transfer credits program, allowing them to leverage prior academic work efficiently.

Data analytics is another strong pathway. A specialized master's degree in this field offers advanced training in data interpretation and statistical methods, complementing a mathematics background. You can learn more about these advanced opportunities in the analytics masters programs.

For those seeking flexible, accessible leadership training, many students consider programs that are easier to access and complete. The mba programs easy to get into allow broader entry points for working professionals or career changers.

Additionally, online formats provide further convenience. Exploring the easiest online mba programs can be ideal for students balancing work and study, emphasizing flexibility without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Gleb Beliakov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles