World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
39
Citations
6295
World Ranking
2206
National Ranking
29

H. De Meyer publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. De Meyer sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 221 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

H. De Meyer D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. De Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

H. De Meyer is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has published research primarily in the areas of computer science, engineering, and decision sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including control and systems engineering, management science and operations research, statistics and probability, computational theory and mathematics, and finance.

Their recent publications reflect a focus on mathematical and computational methods. Notable papers include "Curved splicing of copulas" published in 2020 in the journal Information Sciences, and "Maximal directions of monotonicity of an aggregation function," published in 2021 in Fuzzy Sets and Systems.

H. De Meyer's research interests cover a range of specific topics including numerical methods and algorithms, financial risk and volatility modeling, fault detection and control systems, multi-criteria decision making, fuzzy systems and optimization, and optimization and mathematical programming. Additionally, their work involves statistical distribution estimation and applications.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Bernard De Baets, with whom H. De Meyer has coauthored three papers, as well as T. Jwaid and A. Haj Ismail.

Their publications have appeared in venues such as Information Sciences and Fuzzy Sets and Systems, which are consistent with their research domains.

  • Curved splicing of copulas (2020, Information Sciences)
  • Maximal directions of monotonicity of an aggregation function (2021, Fuzzy Sets and Systems)

  • Bernard De Baets
  • T. Jwaid
  • A. Haj Ismail

  • Information Sciences
  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering
  • Decision Sciences

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Finance

  • Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Best Publications

  • Exponentially-fitted explicit Runge–Kutta methods

    G. Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer;M. Van Daele;T. Van Hecke

  • Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations

    B. De. Baets;H. De. Meyer;B. De. Schuymer

  • Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Exponentially fitted Runge-Kutta methods

    G. Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer;M. Van Daele;T. Van Hecke

  • Frequency evaluation in exponential fitting multistep algorithms for ODEs

    L. Gr. Ixaru;G. Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer

  • On the existence and construction of T -transitive closures

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Exponentially fitted variable two-step BDF algorithm for first order ODEs☆

    L.Gr. Ixaru;G. Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer

  • On the cycle-transitivity of the dice model

    B. de Schuymer;H. de Meyer;B. de Baets;S. Jenei

  • A class of rational cardinality-based similarity measures

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer;H. Naessens

  • On the transitivity of a parametric family of cardinality-based similarity measures

    B. De Baets;S. Janssens;H. De Meyer

  • Knowledge accumulation and resolution of data inconsistencies during the integration of microbial information sources

    P. Dawyndt;M. Vancanneyt;H. De Meyer;J. Swings

  • Orthogonal Grid Constructions of Copulas

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Algorithms for the computation of T-transitive closures

    H. Naessens;H. De Meyer;B. De Baets

  • Linear optimization with bipolar max-min constraints

    S. Freson;B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Algorithms for computing the min-transitive closure and associated partition tree of a symmetric fuzzy relation

    H. De Meyer;H. Naessens;B. De Baets

  • Bell-type inequalities for quasi-copulas

    S. Janssens;B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Frequency determination and step-length control for exponentially-fitted Runge---Kutta methods

    G. Vanden Berghe;L. Gr. Ixaru;H. De Meyer

  • Cycle-transitive comparison of independent random variables

    B. De Schuymer;H. De Meyer;B. De Baets

  • Weights of the exponential fitting multistep algorithms for first-order ODEs

    L. Gr. Ixaru;M. Rizea;G. Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer

  • On the cycle-transitive comparison of artificially coupled random variables

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Four-step exponential-fitted methods for nonlinear physical problems

    L.Gr. Ixaru;G.Vanden Berghe;H. De Meyer;M. Van Dacle

Frequent Co-Authors

G. Vanden Berghe
G. Vanden Berghe Ghent University
Radko Mesiar
Radko Mesiar Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
Marc Leman
Marc Leman Ghent University
Johan Debevere
Johan Debevere Ghent University
Jean Swings
Jean Swings Ghent University
Gleb Beliakov
Gleb Beliakov Deakin University
Irina Perfilieva
Irina Perfilieva University of Ostrava

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many graduates complement their quantitative skills with business knowledge, making an one year MBA an attractive option for fast-tracking leadership roles.

Additionally, those looking for flexibility may consider an online MBA with transfer credits accepted. This pathway allows credit for prior coursework, reducing time and cost while enhancing skills like management and decision-making critical in technical careers.

Mathematically inclined students often gravitate toward data-rich fields. Pursuing a data analytics masters programs online equips students to analyze and interpret complex datasets, a skill highly valued in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology.

For those seeking accessible entry points into graduate business education, exploring the easiest MBA programs can provide a realistic pathway while still enhancing career prospects. Balancing mathematical expertise with business acumen remains crucial for success across industries.

Best Scientists Citing H. De Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles