World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
16683
World Ranking
5018
National Ranking
209

François Chollet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Chollet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

François Chollet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where François Chollet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

François Chollet is affiliated with the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse in France. Their research spans multiple fields of study, primarily focusing on Medicine with substantial contributions to Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, and Physiology.

Their recent publications reflect a diverse research agenda. Notable papers include Assessing the (In)Ability of LLMs to Reason in Interval Temporal Logic published in 2025 in Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server, Special Issue "On Defining Artificial Intelligence"-Commentaries and Author's Response in 2020 in the Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, and multiple works in 2020 such as Effect of monitoring surgical outcomes using control charts to reduce major adverse events in patients: cluster randomised trial in BMJ, and Amyloid-β transmission through cardiac surgery using cadaveric dura mater patch in the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. Another relevant publication is Recovery after stroke: the severely impaired are a distinct group in 2021, also appearing in the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

The research topics Chollet engages with cover:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Key frequent co-authors in their work include Antoine Duclos, Stéphanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Léa Pascal, and Pierre Payoux, indicating collaborative research efforts across clinical and computational domains.

Their contributions are regularly published in several venues such as the Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine, arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, European Journal of Neurology, and the Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.

Chollet's research demonstrates interdisciplinary integration between medical sciences and artificial intelligence, reflecting a focus on neurological diseases, surgical outcomes, and computational reasoning models. This integrated approach points to a commitment to leveraging AI-driven methods in clinical research and healthcare optimization.

Best Publications

  • The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects.

    Jean-François Démonet;François Chollet;Stuart Ramsay;Dominique Cardebat

  • The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography.

    F. Chollet;V. DiPiero;V. DiPiero;R. J. Wise;D. J. Brooks

  • Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    François Chollet;Jean Tardy;Jean-François Albucher;Claire Thalamas

  • FUNCTIONAL REORGANIZATION OF THE BRAIN IN RECOVERY FROM STRIATOCAPSULAR INFARCTION IN MAN

    Cornelius Weiller;François Chollet;Karl J. Friston;Richard J. S. Wise

  • Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval.

    Richard Wise;François Chollet;Uri Hadar;Karl Friston

  • Effect of long-term omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with or without multidomain intervention on cognitive function in elderly adults with memory complaints (MAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

    Sandrine Andrieu;Sandrine Andrieu;Sophie Guyonnet;Sophie Guyonnet;Nicola Coley;Nicola Coley;Christelle Cantet;Christelle Cantet

  • Cortical motor reorganization in akinetic patients with Parkinson's disease: A functional MRI study

    U. Sabatini;K. Boulanouar;N. Fabre;F. Martin

  • Hypothalamic Activation in Spontaneous Migraine Attacks

    Marie Denuelle;Nelly Fabre;Pierre Payoux;Francois Chollet

  • Fluoxetine modulates motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke.

    Jérémie Pariente;Isabelle Loubinoux;Christophe Carel;Jean‐François Albucher

  • Effect of levodopa on pain threshold in Parkinson's disease: a clinical and positron emission tomography study.

    Christine Brefel-Courbon;Pierre Payoux;Claire Thalamas;Fabienne Ory

  • A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients.

    David Tombari;Isabelle Loubinoux;Jérémie Pariente;Angélique Gerdelat

  • Differential fMRI responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones.

    P. Celsis;K. Boulanouar;B. Doyon;J.P. Ranjeva

  • Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts.

    Isabelle Loubinoux;Christophe Carel;Jérémie Pariente;Sophie Dechaumont

  • Writing, calculating, and finger recognition in the region of the angular gyrus: a cortical stimulation study of Gerstmann syndrome

    Franck-Emmanuel Roux;Sergio Boetto;Oumar Sacko;François Chollet

  • Supplementary and Primary Sensory Motor Area Activity in Parkinson's Disease: Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Changes During Finger Movements and Effects of Apomorphine

    Olivier Rascol;Umberto Sabatini;François Chollet;Pierre Celsis

  • Design and baseline characteristics of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Study

    Henrik Sillesen;Gregory Albers;Irfan Altafullah;Oscar Benavente

  • The ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere is overactive during hand movements in akinetic parkinsonian patients.

    O Rascol;U Sabatini;N Fabre;C Brefel

  • Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects.

    Christophe Carel;Isabelle Loubinoux;Kader Boulanouar;Claude Manelfe

  • Alzheimer's patients engage an alternative network during a memory task

    Jérémie Pariente;Susanna Cole;Richard Henson;Linda Clare

  • Within-session and between-session reproducibility of cerebral sensorimotor activation: a test--retest effect evidenced with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Isabelle Loubinoux;Christophe Carel;Flamine Alary;Kader Boulanouar

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-François Démonet
Jean-François Démonet University Hospital of Lausanne
Emmanuel J. Barbeau
Emmanuel J. Barbeau Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Umberto Sabatini
Umberto Sabatini Magna Graecia University
Olivier Rascol
Olivier Rascol Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Richard S. J. Frackowiak
Richard S. J. Frackowiak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Richard J. S. Wise
Richard J. S. Wise Imperial College London
Christian Vincent
Christian Vincent Grenoble Alpes University
Christian Dettmers
Christian Dettmers University of Konstanz
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA offers numerous opportunities to branch into related fields through flexible education options. Many students leverage online psy d programs to bridge neuroscience and clinical practice, especially if considering a future in psychology or therapy.

For those seeking quicker entry into a mental health career, the online masters mft pathway provides accelerated options for becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist—often appealing to neuroscience graduates interested in applied counseling roles.

Students who wish to finish their degree faster may also consider accelerated online degrees, which allow motivated learners to start their career or further education sooner.

Finally, if earning potential is a priority, explore 4 year degrees that pay well. Many interdisciplinary degrees—such as neuroscience combined with computer science or engineering—are in high demand across various industries.

Best Scientists Citing François Chollet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles