World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lil Valentin

Lil Valentin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17107 16084 325 305 528 23428

Lil Valentin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lil Valentin between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lil Valentin published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2023. 25 of the 629 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2023. 1962: 3 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 3 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 3 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 3 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 38 publications 2008: 44 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 9 publications
1962 2025

629 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lil Valentin: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 3
1963 3
1964 2
1965 3
1966 0
1967 1
1968 3
1969 2
1970 1
1971 3
1972 0
1973 3
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 6
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 7
1995 9
1996 3
1997 9
1998 4
1999 9
2000 9
2001 9
2002 15
2003 14
2004 15
2005 17
2006 29
2007 38
2008 44
2009 32
2010 27
2011 25
2012 26
2013 13
2014 20
2015 13
2016 16
2017 27
2018 19
2019 16
2020 16
2021 16
2022 10
2023 48
2024 16
2025 9
Total 629
Download as CSV

Lil Valentin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lil Valentin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 528 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 528
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lil Valentin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lil Valentin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lil Valentin is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

Their research topics cover a wide range of gynecological conditions and treatments, with particular emphasis on ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment, endometrial and cervical cancer treatments, intraperitoneal and appendiceal malignancies, endometriosis research and treatment, gynecological conditions and treatments, uterine myomas and treatments, and preterm birth and chorioamnionitis.

The most frequent venues where Lil Valentin has published include:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ

Some of Lil Valentin's recent papers are:

  • Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure, 2021, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study, 2020, BMJ
  • Imaging in gynecological disease (20): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion, 2020, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Typical ultrasound features of various endometrial pathologies described using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding, 2020, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of lymph nodes: consensus opinion from the Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) group, 2021, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Frequent co-authors of Lil Valentin include:

  • D. Timmerman
  • A. C. Testa
  • T. Bourne
  • Wouter Froyman
  • Ben Van Calster

Best Publications

  • Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group

    Dirk Timmerman;L Valentin;Tom Bourne;W P Collins

  • Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding — a Nordic multicenter study☆

    Bengt Karlsson;Seth Granberg;Matts Wikland;Pekka Ylöstalo

  • Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group

    S. Guerriero;G. Condous;T. Van Den Bosch;L. Valentin

  • Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

    D Timmerman;Antonia Carla Testa;T Bourne;L Ameye

  • Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group

    T. van den Bosch;M. Dueholm;F. P. G. Leone;Lil Valentin

  • Logistic Regression Model to Distinguish Between the Benign and Malignant Adnexal Mass Before Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group

    Dirk Timmerman;Antonia Carla Testa;Tom Bourne;Enrico Ferrazzi

  • Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group

    Dirk Timmerman;Lieveke Ameye;Daniela Fischerova;Elisabeth Epstein

  • Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study.

    Ben Van Calster;Kirsten Van Hoorde;Lil Valentin;Antonia C Testa

  • High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination

    O Vikhareva Osser;Ligita Jokubkiene;Lil Valentin

  • Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group

    Dirk Timmerman;Ben Van Calster;Antonia Testa;Luca Savelli

  • ROUTINE FORMAL FETAL MOVEMENT COUNTING AND RISK OF ANTEPARTUM LATE DEATH IN NORMALLY FORMED SINGLETONS

    Adrian Grant;Lil Valentin;Diana Elbourne;Sophie Alexander

  • Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding

    Elisabeth Epstein;Anette Ramirez;Lennart Skoog;Lil Valentin

  • Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics

    C. Van Holsbeke;B. Van Calster;S. Guerriero;L. Savelli

  • Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group

    F. P. G. Leone;D. Timmerman;T. Bourne;Lil Valentin

  • Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Specialist Ultrasound Examination Versus Serum CA-125

    Ben Van Calster;Dirk Timmerman;Tom Bourne;Antonia Carla Testa

  • Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrium > 5 mm

    Elisabeth Epstein;Anette Ramirez;Lennart Skoog;Lil Valentin

  • Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation

    Lil Valentin;B Hagen;S Tingulstad;S Eik-Nes

  • Re: Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years.

    Lil Valentin

  • Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.

    J. Kaijser;T. Bourne;T. Bourne;L. Valentin;A Sayasneh

  • Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.

    A Sokalska;Dirk Timmerman;A C Testa;C Van Holsbeke

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Bourne
Tom Bourne Imperial College London
Davor Jurkovic
Davor Jurkovic University College London
Giovanni Scambia
Giovanni Scambia Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Karel Marsal
Karel Marsal Lund University
Henrik Hagberg
Henrik Hagberg University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA opens doors to various online programs and flexible pathways, especially for those balancing work or family commitments. Healthcare professionals looking to advance their leadership skills might consider exploring whats the best online mha program for working adults. These programs are designed for busy professionals seeking management roles within hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Registered Nurses can further their qualifications through online routes as well. For those wanting a flexible option without the need for in-person clinicals, there are options like rn to bsn online without clinicals. This allows RNs to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing with a more adaptable schedule.

For nurses aiming at the highest level of practice, choosing a doctoral pathway is key. Some may prioritize speed and efficiency, so looking at the shortest online dnp program can be a practical solution. Others may be searching for a less rigorous path and can benefit from student insights found in discussions about the easiest dnp program reddit has to offer.

These diverse online options give healthcare professionals and future medical students flexible ways to expand their expertise and advance their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Lil Valentin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles