World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
9353
World Ranking
7930
National Ranking
2822

Paul W. Stackhouse publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Stackhouse sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul W. Stackhouse D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Stackhouse sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul W. Stackhouse is affiliated with the Langley Research Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental and earth sciences, with a focus on atmospheric and planetary processes.

The scientist's recent publications demonstrate contributions to a variety of topics and journals. Notable papers include:

  • A solar azimuth formula that renders circumstantial treatment unnecessary without compromising mathematical rigor: Mathematical setup, application and extension of a formula based on the subsolar point and atan2 function, 2021, Renewable Energy
  • Global Oceans, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Satellite Data Applications for Sustainable Energy Transitions, 2022, Frontiers in Sustainability
  • Global Oceans, 2023, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Global Oceans, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent co-authors associated with Stackhouse include:

  • Ivona Cetinić
  • D. P. Chambers
  • Lijing Cheng
  • Shenfu Dong
  • Bryan A. Franz

The scientist's work is often published in notable venues such as:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Solar Energy
  • Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
  • International Journal of Critical Infrastructures
  • Renewable Energy

Paul W. Stackhouse's research fields are primarily Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Within these, their work covers several subfields including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Oceanography

Major topics addressed across their body of work include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Climate variability and models

Best Publications

  • An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations

    Graeme L. Stephens;Juilin Li;Martin Wild;Carol Anne Clayson

  • Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations

    Amber J. Soja;Nadezda M. Tchebakova;Nancy H.F. French;Michael D. Flannigan

  • The Relevance of the Microphysical and Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds to Climate and Climatic Feedback

    Graeme L. Stephens;Si-Chee Tsay;Paul W. Stackhouse;Piotr J. Flatau

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Improvements of top-of-atmosphere and surface irradiance computations with CALIPSO-, CloudSat-, and MODIS-derived cloud and aerosol properties

    Seiji Kato;Fred G. Rose;Sunny Sun-Mack;Walter F. Miller

  • A Climatology of Surface Radiation Budget Derived from Satellite Data

    Shashi K. Gupta;Nancy A. Ritchey;Anne C. Wilber;Charles H. Whitlock

  • Estimating fire emissions and disparities in boreal Siberia (1998–2002)

    Amber J. Soja;Amber J. Soja;W. Randy Cofer;Herman H. Shugart;Anatoly I. Sukhinin

  • Impact of clouds on atmospheric heating based on the R04 CloudSat fluxes and heating rates data set

    Tristan S. L'Ecuyer;Norman B. Wood;Taryn Haladay;Graeme L. Stephens

  • Surface meteorology and Solar Energy

    Paul W. Stackhouse

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Air-Sea Fluxes With a Focus on Heat and Momentum

    Meghan F. Cronin;Chelle Leigh Gentemann;James B Edson;Iwao Ueki

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • The Global Character of the Flux of Downward Longwave Radiation

    Graeme L. Stephens;Martin Wild;Paul W. Stackhouse;Tristan L'Ecuyer

  • Surface insolation trends from satellite and ground measurements: Comparisons and challenges

    Laura M. Hinkelman;Paul W. Stackhouse;Bruce A. Wielicki;Taiping Zhang

  • A Theoretical and Observational Study of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus: Results from FIRE 1986.

    Paul W. Stackhouse;Graeme L. Stephens

  • Evaluation of NASA satellite- and assimilation model-derived long-term daily temperature data over the continental US

    Jeffrey W. White;Gerrit Hoogenboom;Paul W. Stackhouse;James M. Hoell

  • AVHRR-derived fire frequency, distribution and area burned in Siberia

    A. J. Soja;A. I. Sukhinin;D. R. Cahoon;H. H. Shugart

  • Application of deep convective cloud albedo observation to satellite-based study of the terrestrial atmosphere: monitoring the stability of spaceborne measurements and assessing absorption anomaly

    Yongxiang Hu;B.A. Wielicki;Ping Yang;P.W. Stackhouse

  • Evaluation of Satellite-Based, Modeled-Derived Daily Solar Radiation Data for the Continental United States

    Jeffrey W. White;Gerrit Hoogenboom;Gerrit Hoogenboom;Paul W. Wilkens;Paul W. Stackhouse

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Perez
Richard Perez University at Albany, State University of New York
Seiji Kato
Seiji Kato Langley Research Center
Norman G. Loeb
Norman G. Loeb Langley Research Center
Bruce A. Wielicki
Bruce A. Wielicki Langley Research Center
Johannes W. Kaiser
Johannes W. Kaiser German Meteorological Service
Patrick Minnis
Patrick Minnis Langley Research Center
Martin Wild
Martin Wild ETH Zurich
Michael G. Bosilovich
Michael G. Bosilovich Goddard Space Flight Center
Marco Tedesco
Marco Tedesco Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Catia M. Domingues
Catia M. Domingues National Oceanography Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that blend well with this field. For those considering a foundational degree, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help in choosing a path that balances interest and workload.

Online geology degrees offer specialized knowledge about earth processes and materials, which are crucial for careers in environmental assessment and resource management. Students can find highly regarded programs through resources highlighting online geology degrees, enabling flexible learning without compromising quality.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another vital area linked to environmental sciences. GIS skills help analyze spatial data for conservation, urban planning, and disaster response. Prospective students can explore the best GIS programs in the US to find opportunities that match their career goals.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public sector management, pursuing advanced studies can be beneficial. The best online masters in public administration programs provide essential leadership and administrative skills to drive sustainable initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Stackhouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles