World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
13836
World Ranking
7394
National Ranking
3224

J. Alex Halderman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Alex Halderman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 99 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. Alex Halderman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Alex Halderman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow
  • 2015 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

J. Alex Halderman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions spanning 26 publications.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Halderman's main research topics involve Internet traffic analysis and secure e-voting, reflected in 24 publications dedicated to these areas. Other areas of focus include:

  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Wireless Networks and Protocols

Their publication record includes papers in various venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • OpenVPN is Open to VPN Fingerprinting, 2024, Communications of the ACM
  • Running Refraction Networking for Real, 2020, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Challenges in Cybersecurity: Lessons from Biological Defense Systems, 2023, Mathematical Biosciences
  • Characterizing Transnational Internet Performance and the Great Bottleneck of China, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • Improving the Security of United States Elections with Robust Optimization, 2024, Operations Research

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Braden L. Crimmins
  • Roya Ensafi
  • Eric Wustrow
  • Bradley Sturt
  • Diwen Xue

Halderman has been recognized with awards such as the Andrew Carnegie Fellow in 2019 and was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Lest we remember: cold-boot attacks on encryption keys

    J. Alex Halderman;Seth D. Schoen;Nadia Heninger;William Clarkson

  • Understanding the mirai botnet

    Manos Antonakakis;Tim April;Michael Bailey;Matthew Bernhard

  • The Matter of Heartbleed

    Zakir Durumeric;Frank Li;James Kasten;Johanna Amann

  • ZMap: fast internet-wide scanning and its security applications

    Zakir Durumeric;Eric Wustrow;J. Alex Halderman

  • Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice

    David Adrian;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Zakir Durumeric;Pierrick Gaudry

  • A Search Engine Backed by Internet-Wide Scanning

    Zakir Durumeric;David Adrian;Ariana Mirian;Michael Bailey

  • Mining your Ps and Qs: detection of widespread weak keys in network devices

    Nadia Heninger;Zakir Durumeric;Eric Wustrow;J. Alex Halderman

  • Analysis of the HTTPS certificate ecosystem

    Zakir Durumeric;James Kasten;Michael Bailey;J. Alex Halderman

  • Security Analysis of the Estonian Internet Voting System

    Drew Springall;Travis Finkenauer;Zakir Durumeric;Jason Kitcat

  • Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Practice

    Joppe W. Bos;J. Alex Halderman;Nadia Heninger;Jonathan Moore

  • A convenient method for securely managing passwords

    J. Alex Halderman;Brent Waters;Edward W. Felten

  • Security analysis of the diebold AccuVote-TS voting machine

    Ariel J. Feldman;J. Alex Halderman;Edward W. Felten

  • Security analysis of India's electronic voting machines

    Scott Wolchok;Eric Wustrow;J. Alex Halderman;Hari K. Prasad

  • New client puzzle outsourcing techniques for DoS resistance

    Brent Waters;Ari Juels;J. Alex Halderman;Edward W. Felten

  • DROWN: Breaking TLS using SSLv2

    Nimrod Aviram;Sebastian Schinzel;Juraj Somorovsky;Nadia Heninger

  • Internet censorship in china: where does the filtering occur?

    Xueyang Xu;Z. Morley Mao;J. Alex Halderman

  • Internet Censorship in Iran: A First Look

    Simurgh Aryan;Homa Aryan;J. Alex Halderman

  • Telex: anticensorship in the network infrastructure

    Eric Wustrow;Scott Wolchok;Ian Goldberg;J. Alex Halderman

  • Green lights forever: analyzing the security of traffic infrastructure

    Branden Ghena;William Beyer;Allen Hillaker;Jonathan Pevarnek

  • The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception

    Zakir Durumeric;Zane Ma;Drew Springall;Richard Barnes

Frequent Co-Authors

Zakir Durumeric
Zakir Durumeric University of California, Berkeley
Edward W. Felten
Edward W. Felten Princeton University
Michael Bailey
Michael Bailey Georgia Institute of Technology
Brent Waters
Brent Waters The University of Texas at Austin
Nikita Borisov
Nikita Borisov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dan S. Wallach
Dan S. Wallach Rice University
Hovav Shacham
Hovav Shacham The University of Texas at Austin
Josh Benaloh
Josh Benaloh Microsoft (United States)
Elie Bursztein
Elie Bursztein Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to various alternative and related online education options. For those seeking flexible and accelerated entry into the workforce, online associate degrees can be completed in as little as six months, providing foundational knowledge and practical skills.

Demand for interdisciplinary expertise is also growing. Many students pursue the best online business management degree to complement technical skills with managerial insight. This dual focus is attractive for tech-driven startups and leadership roles in IT companies.

Cost remains a key concern for prospective students. Those aiming to minimize expenses can benefit from the cheapest online colleges, which offer affordable tuition without sacrificing educational quality. It’s also important to consider the online engineering degree cost when comparing programs, especially for those interested in closely related STEM pathways.

Ultimately, the flexibility of online study, combined with a wide range of career pathways, makes online degrees a practical choice for many students balancing education, work, and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing J. Alex Halderman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles