World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7073 6868 3106 2989 95 11322

Michael Bailey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Bailey between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Bailey published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2013. 10 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2013. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Bailey: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 6
2010 4
2011 4
2012 5
2013 10
2014 9
2015 10
2016 7
2017 7
2018 6
2019 3
2020 2
2021 9
2022 1
2023 5
2024 5
2025 5
Total 113
Download as CSV

Michael Bailey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 95
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Bailey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Michael Bailey is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focused on Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Bailey's work engages with subfields such as Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's recent publications cover a variety of relevant topics and demonstrate ongoing contributions to interdisciplinary areas. Key recent papers include:

  • "CodonBERT: Large Language Models for mRNA design and optimization" (2023), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "CodonBERT large language model for mRNA vaccines" (2024), published in Genome Research
  • "Representations of lipid nanoparticles using large language models for transfection efficiency prediction" (2024), published in Bioinformatics
  • "Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives" (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Testing Snowden's Hypothesis Does Mere Awareness Drive Opposition to Government Surveillance?" (2020), published in Public Opinion Quarterly

Their work frequently addresses several main topics, including:

  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics

Bailey maintains collaborative research relationships with several frequent co-authors, including Lorenzo Kogler-Anele, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Sven Jäger, Sizhen Li, and Saeed Moayedpour. These collaborations have contributed to multiple projects and publications.

Their work has been disseminated in various scholarly venues, with multiple publications appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) and arXiv (Cornell University). Other notable venues include Genome Research, Bioinformatics, and Public Opinion Quarterly.

Bailey was awarded the ACM Senior Member designation in 2012. This recognition reflects standing within the professional computing community, though no further honor details are provided.

Best Publications

  • Understanding the mirai botnet

    Manos Antonakakis;Tim April;Michael Bailey;Matthew Bernhard

  • The Matter of Heartbleed

    Zakir Durumeric;Frank Li;James Kasten;Johanna Amann

  • Automated classification and analysis of internet malware

    Michael Bailey;Jon Oberheide;Jon Andersen;Z. Morley Mao

  • A Search Engine Backed by Internet-Wide Scanning

    Zakir Durumeric;David Adrian;Ariana Mirian;Michael Bailey

  • Towards an understanding of anti-virtualization and anti-debugging behavior in modern malware

    Xu Chen;J. Andersen;Z.M. Mao;M. Bailey

  • Analysis of the HTTPS certificate ecosystem

    Zakir Durumeric;James Kasten;Michael Bailey;J. Alex Halderman

  • The Internet Motion Sensor - A Distributed Blackhole Monitoring System.

    Michael Bailey;Evan Cooke;Farnam Jahanian;Jose Nazario

  • A Survey of Botnet Technology and Defenses

    Michael Bailey;Evan Cooke;Farnam Jahanian;Yunjing Xu

  • An exploration of L2 cache covert channels in virtualized environments

    Yunjing Xu;Michael Bailey;Farnam Jahanian;Kaustubh Joshi

  • Bohatei: flexible and elastic DDoS defense

    Seyed K. Fayaz;Yoshiaki Tobioka;Vyas Sekar;Michael Bailey

  • Bobtail: avoiding long tails in the cloud

    Yunjing Xu;Zachary Musgrave;Brian Noble;Michael Bailey

  • Internet background radiation revisited

    Eric Wustrow;Manish Karir;Michael Bailey;Farnam Jahanian

  • Cloudy with a chance of breach: forecasting cyber security incidents

    Yang Liu;Armin Sarabi;Jing Zhang;Parinaz Naghizadeh

  • Taming the 800 Pound Gorilla: The Rise and Decline of NTP DDoS Attacks

    Jakub Czyz;Michael Kallitsis;Manaf Gharaibeh;Christos Papadopoulos

  • The Blaster worm: then and now

    M. Bailey;E. Cooke;F. Jahanian;D. Watson

  • The Menlo Report

    M. Bailey;D. Dittrich;E. Kenneally;D. Maughan

  • Measuring IPv6 adoption

    Jakub Czyz;Mark Allman;Jing Zhang;Scott Iekel-Johnson

  • The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception

    Zakir Durumeric;Zane Ma;Drew Springall;Richard Barnes

  • Shades of grey: On the effectiveness of reputation-based “blacklists”

    S. Sinha;M. Bailey;F. Jahanian

  • Toward understanding distributed blackhole placement

    Evan Cooke;Michael Bailey;Z. Morley Mao;David Watson

  • An internet-wide view of internet-wide scanning

    Zakir Durumeric;Michael Bailey;J. Alex Halderman

Frequent Co-Authors

Farnam Jahanian
Farnam Jahanian Carnegie Mellon University
Zakir Durumeric
Zakir Durumeric University of California, Berkeley
J. Alex Halderman
J. Alex Halderman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Elie Bursztein
Elie Bursztein Google (United States)
Mingyan Liu
Mingyan Liu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Yih-Chun Hu
Yih-Chun Hu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fabian Monrose
Fabian Monrose University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Brian D. Noble
Brian D. Noble University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Vyas Sekar
Vyas Sekar Carnegie Mellon University
Vern Paxson
Vern Paxson University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens diverse opportunities. Many students begin their journey with 1 year associate degree programs online, allowing for a quick start in technology-focused careers or a stepping stone to four-year programs. Affordability is a key concern, and finding cheap online colleges makes pursuing a high-quality education more accessible for students from all backgrounds.

Grades don’t have to be a barrier to entry, either. There is a growing list of best colleges for low gpa, which offer second chances and flexible options for those who may not have a perfect academic record. With a Computer Science degree, graduates can pursue various IT roles, but the same principle applies in other fields as well. For example, those interested in sustainability or ecological work may want to explore jobs for environmental science majors for more unique career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles