World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7239
World Ranking
10592
National Ranking
4436

Elie Bursztein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elie Bursztein sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 96 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elie Bursztein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elie Bursztein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elie Bursztein is affiliated with Google in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a focus on security, artificial intelligence, and information systems. Their body of work includes research on advanced malware detection, cryptographic implementations, spam and phishing detection, network security, and hate speech detection.

Their research has been published in a variety of venues, demonstrating involvement across several specialized forums. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security
  • IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • Annual Computer Security Applications Conference

Recent publications by Bursztein include:

  • "It's common and a part of being a content creator": Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI (2023), Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security
  • CoinPolice: Detecting Hidden Cryptojacking Attacks with Neural Networks (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Designing Toxic Content Classification for a Diversity of Perspectives (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Generalized Power Attacks against Crypto Hardware using Long-Range Deep Learning (2024), IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems

Bursztein's frequent co-authors include:

  • Kurt Thomas
  • Luca Invernizzi
  • Patrick Gage Kelley
  • Marina Yue Zhang
  • Sunny Consolvo

The scientist's work covers a range of main fields and subfields of study:

  • Computer Science

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture

Main topics of work include:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Topic Modeling

Best Publications

  • Understanding the mirai botnet

    Manos Antonakakis;Tim April;Michael Bailey;Matthew Bernhard

  • State of the Art: Automated Black-Box Web Application Vulnerability Testing

    Jason Bau;Elie Bursztein;Divij Gupta;John Mitchell

  • The first collision for full SHA-1

    Marc Stevens;Elie Bursztein;Pierre Karpman;Ange Albertini

  • Text-based CAPTCHA strengths and weaknesses

    Elie Bursztein;Matthieu Martin;John Mitchell

  • How Good Are Humans at Solving CAPTCHAs? A Large Scale Evaluation

    Elie Bursztein;Steven Bethard;Celine Fabry;John C. Mitchell

  • An analysis of private browsing modes in modern browsers

    Gaurav Aggarwal;Elie Bursztein;Collin Jackson;Dan Boneh

  • Tracking Ransomware End-to-end

    Danny Yuxing Huang;Maxwell Matthaios Aliapoulios;Vector Guo Li;Luca Invernizzi

  • Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen Credentials

    Kurt Thomas;Frank Li;Ali Zand;Jacob Barrett

  • The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception

    Zakir Durumeric;Zane Ma;Drew Springall;Richard Barnes

  • Kamouflage : loss-resistant password management

    Hristo Bojinov;Elie Bursztein;Xavier Boyen;Dan Boneh

  • "They Don't Leave Us Alone Anywhere We Go": Gender and Digital Abuse in South Asia

    Nithya Sambasivan;Amna Batool;Nova Ahmed;Tara Matthews

  • The end is nigh: generic solving of text-based CAPTCHAs

    Elie Bursztein;Jonathan Aigrain;Angelika Moscicki;John C. Mitchell

  • Neither Snow Nor Rain Nor MITM...: An Empirical Analysis of Email Delivery Security

    Zakir Durumeric;David Adrian;Ariana Mirian;James Kasten

  • Busting frame busting a study of clickjacking vulnerabilities on popular sites

    Gustav Rydstedt;Elie Bursztein;Dan Boneh;Collin Jackson

  • Ad Injection at Scale: Assessing Deceptive Advertisement Modifications

    Kurt Thomas;Elie Bursztein;Chris Grier;Grant Ho

  • Framing dependencies introduced by underground commoditization

    Kurt Thomas;Danny Yuxing Huang;David Y. Wang;Elie Bursztein

  • SoK: Hate, Harassment, and the Changing Landscape of Online Abuse

    Kurt Thomas;Devdatta Akhawe;Michael Bailey;Dan Boneh

  • Users Really Do Plug in USB Drives They Find

    Matthew Tischer;Zakir Durumeric;Sam Foster;Sunny Duan

  • The Failure of Noise-Based Non-continuous Audio Captchas

    Elie Bursztein;Romain Beauxis;Hristo Paskov;Daniele Perito

  • Handcrafted Fraud and Extortion: Manual Account Hijacking in the Wild

    Elie Bursztein;Borbala Benko;Daniel Margolis;Tadek Pietraszek

  • Protecting accounts from credential stuffing with password breach alerting

    Kurt Thomas;Jennifer Pullman;Kevin Yeo;Ananth Raghunathan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Boneh
Dan Boneh Stanford University
John C. Mitchell
John C. Mitchell Stanford University
Michael Bailey
Michael Bailey Georgia Institute of Technology
Sunny Consolvo
Sunny Consolvo Google (United States)
Zakir Durumeric
Zakir Durumeric University of California, Berkeley
Damon McCoy
Damon McCoy New York University
Vern Paxson
Vern Paxson University of California, Berkeley
Patrick Gage Kelley
Patrick Gage Kelley University of New Mexico
Steven Bethard
Steven Bethard University of Arizona
J. Alex Halderman
J. Alex Halderman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies in the USA paves the way for a variety of related academic and professional directions. If you're looking for flexibility or affordability, pursuing the cheapest online bachelors degree can help you jump-start your tech career without breaking the bank.

An engineer degree online is an excellent option for those interested in software, systems, or hardware engineering fields closely allied to computer science. Online formats not only offer flexibility but also make it easier for working adults and international students to gain competitive credentials.

For professionals aiming at leadership or tech management, an online executive mba can be a valuable addition—equipping you with skills to bridge the gap between tech innovation and business strategy.

Alternately, careers in information management, archives, or digital libraries may benefit from an online mlis. This degree focuses on organizing and managing information, which is highly relevant in today’s data-driven world.

Best Scientists Citing Elie Bursztein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles