World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10553
World Ranking
5097
National Ranking
304

Benjamin Livshits publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Livshits sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Benjamin Livshits D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Livshits sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Livshits is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science with a focus on several specialized subfields. Their research spans Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work covers main topics such as Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Cryptography and Data Security, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, and Spam and Phishing Detection.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Benjamin Livshits include:

  • Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profit (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • A study of inline assembly in solidity smart contracts (2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages)
  • STAR (2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
  • A Puff of Steem: Security Analysis of Decentralized Content Curation (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Measuring the Privacy vs. Compatibility Trade-off in Preventing Third-Party Stateful Tracking (2022, Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022)

Benjamin Livshits frequently publishes in these venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022

Key co-authors collaborating with Benjamin Livshits include:

  • Arthur Gervais
  • Stefanos Chaliasos
  • Liyi Zhou
  • Hamed Haddadi
  • Krzysztof Gogol

Benjamin Livshits has contributed to at least 68 publications in Computer Science, with significant work focused on 32 publications in Artificial Intelligence and 24 in Information Systems, indicating a strong interdisciplinary approach within computing and data-related fields.

Best Publications

  • Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language

    Michael Martin;Benjamin Livshits;Monica S. Lam

  • DynaMine: finding common error patterns by mining software revision histories

    Benjamin Livshits;Thomas Zimmermann

  • ZOZZLE: fast and precise in-browser JavaScript malware detection

    Charlie Curtsinger;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin Zorn;Christian Seifert

  • AjaxScope: A Platform for Remotely Monitoring the Client-Side Behavior of Web 2.0 Applications

    Emre Kiciman;Benjamin Livshits

  • NOZZLE: a defense against heap-spraying code injection attacks

    Paruj Ratanaworabhan;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin Zorn

  • In defense of soundiness: a manifesto

    Benjamin Livshits;Manu Sridharan;Yannis Smaragdakis;Ondřej Lhoták

  • GATEKEEPER: mostly static enforcement of security and reliability policies for javascript code

    Salvatore Guarnieri;Benjamin Livshits

  • ConScript: Specifying and Enforcing Fine-Grained Security Policies for JavaScript in the Browser

    Leo A. Meyerovich;Benjamin Livshits

  • Rozzle: De-cloaking Internet Malware

    C. Kolbitsch;B. Livshits;B. Zorn;C. Seifert

  • Context-sensitive program analysis as database queries

    Monica S. Lam;John Whaley;V. Benjamin Livshits;Michael C. Martin

  • Reflection analysis for java

    Benjamin Livshits;John Whaley;Monica S. Lam

  • Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profit

    Kaihua Qin;Liyi Zhou;Benjamin Livshits;Arthur Gervais

  • JSMeter: comparing the behavior of JavaScript benchmarks with real web applications

    Paruj Ratanaworabhan;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin G. Zorn

  • Fast and precise sanitizer analysis with BEK

    Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar;Prateek Saxena

  • PriVaricator: Deceiving Fingerprinters with Little White Lies

    Nick Nikiforakis;Wouter Joosen;Benjamin Livshits

  • Merlin: specification inference for explicit information flow problems

    Benjamin Livshits;Aditya V. Nori;Sriram K. Rajamani;Anindya Banerjee

  • EthIR: A Framework for High-Level Analysis of Ethereum Bytecode

    Elvira Albert;Pablo Gordillo;Benjamin Livshits;Albert Rubio

  • Symbolic finite state transducers: algorithms and applications

    Margus Veanes;Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar

  • Verified Security for Browser Extensions

    Arjun Guha;Matthew Fredrikson;Benjamin Livshits;Nikhil Swamy

  • Combining personalization and privacy locally on devices

    Benjamin Livshits;Andrew Joseph Davidson

  • Securing web applications with static and dynamic information flow tracking

    Monica S. Lam;Michael Martin;Benjamin Livshits;John Whaley

Frequent Co-Authors

David Molnar
David Molnar Microsoft (United States)
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Madanlal Musuvathi
Madanlal Musuvathi Microsoft (United States)
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Monica S. Lam
Monica S. Lam Stanford University
Thomas Zimmermann
Thomas Zimmermann Microsoft (United States)
Eyal Ofek
Eyal Ofek Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of related fields and career paths. Many students explore degrees that complement their tech knowledge, such as data science, engineering, or physics. Online programs provide flexibility and can help manage expenses, but costs, quality, and long-term value should be carefully weighed.

For those interested in mechanical engineering, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is essential when choosing an online program. Similarly, students drawn to physics should explore the best online physics degree options to find rigorous yet affordable pathways.

Data science remains popular because of high demand for analytics and AI skills. If cost is a concern, it helps to know what is the cheapest data science course in the us? when comparing online offerings. Electrical engineering is another strong choice, and you can review top online electrical engineering courses USA to identify programs that meet your needs.

Exploring these related degrees can help you broaden your expertise, enhance your career opportunities, and find a pathway that best fits your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Livshits

Trending Scientists