World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 5097 4958 304 302 198 10553

Benjamin Livshits publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin Livshits between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin Livshits published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 6 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin Livshits: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 8
2006 3
2007 9
2008 9
2009 13
2010 16
2011 18
2012 11
2013 14
2014 15
2015 13
2016 2
2017 6
2018 6
2019 11
2020 17
2021 18
2022 6
2023 7
2024 20
2025 5
2026 1
Total 229
Download as CSV

Benjamin Livshits publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Livshits sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 198
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin Livshits D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Livshits sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin Livshits is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science with a focus on several specialized subfields. Their research spans Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work covers main topics such as Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, Cryptography and Data Security, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, and Spam and Phishing Detection.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Benjamin Livshits include:

  • Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profit (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • A study of inline assembly in solidity smart contracts (2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages)
  • STAR (2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
  • A Puff of Steem: Security Analysis of Decentralized Content Curation (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Measuring the Privacy vs. Compatibility Trade-off in Preventing Third-Party Stateful Tracking (2022, Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022)

Benjamin Livshits frequently publishes in these venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
  • Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022

Key co-authors collaborating with Benjamin Livshits include:

  • Arthur Gervais
  • Stefanos Chaliasos
  • Liyi Zhou
  • Hamed Haddadi
  • Krzysztof Gogol

Benjamin Livshits has contributed to at least 68 publications in Computer Science, with significant work focused on 32 publications in Artificial Intelligence and 24 in Information Systems, indicating a strong interdisciplinary approach within computing and data-related fields.

Best Publications

  • Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language

    Michael Martin;Benjamin Livshits;Monica S. Lam

  • DynaMine: finding common error patterns by mining software revision histories

    Benjamin Livshits;Thomas Zimmermann

  • ZOZZLE: fast and precise in-browser JavaScript malware detection

    Charlie Curtsinger;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin Zorn;Christian Seifert

  • AjaxScope: A Platform for Remotely Monitoring the Client-Side Behavior of Web 2.0 Applications

    Emre Kiciman;Benjamin Livshits

  • NOZZLE: a defense against heap-spraying code injection attacks

    Paruj Ratanaworabhan;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin Zorn

  • In defense of soundiness: a manifesto

    Benjamin Livshits;Manu Sridharan;Yannis Smaragdakis;Ondřej Lhoták

  • GATEKEEPER: mostly static enforcement of security and reliability policies for javascript code

    Salvatore Guarnieri;Benjamin Livshits

  • ConScript: Specifying and Enforcing Fine-Grained Security Policies for JavaScript in the Browser

    Leo A. Meyerovich;Benjamin Livshits

  • Rozzle: De-cloaking Internet Malware

    C. Kolbitsch;B. Livshits;B. Zorn;C. Seifert

  • Context-sensitive program analysis as database queries

    Monica S. Lam;John Whaley;V. Benjamin Livshits;Michael C. Martin

  • Reflection analysis for java

    Benjamin Livshits;John Whaley;Monica S. Lam

  • Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profit

    Kaihua Qin;Liyi Zhou;Benjamin Livshits;Arthur Gervais

  • JSMeter: comparing the behavior of JavaScript benchmarks with real web applications

    Paruj Ratanaworabhan;Benjamin Livshits;Benjamin G. Zorn

  • Fast and precise sanitizer analysis with BEK

    Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar;Prateek Saxena

  • PriVaricator: Deceiving Fingerprinters with Little White Lies

    Nick Nikiforakis;Wouter Joosen;Benjamin Livshits

  • Merlin: specification inference for explicit information flow problems

    Benjamin Livshits;Aditya V. Nori;Sriram K. Rajamani;Anindya Banerjee

  • EthIR: A Framework for High-Level Analysis of Ethereum Bytecode

    Elvira Albert;Pablo Gordillo;Benjamin Livshits;Albert Rubio

  • Symbolic finite state transducers: algorithms and applications

    Margus Veanes;Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar

  • Verified Security for Browser Extensions

    Arjun Guha;Matthew Fredrikson;Benjamin Livshits;Nikhil Swamy

  • Combining personalization and privacy locally on devices

    Benjamin Livshits;Andrew Joseph Davidson

  • Securing web applications with static and dynamic information flow tracking

    Monica S. Lam;Michael Martin;Benjamin Livshits;John Whaley

Frequent Co-Authors

David Molnar
David Molnar Microsoft (United States)
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)
Emre Kiciman
Emre Kiciman Microsoft (United States)
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Madanlal Musuvathi
Madanlal Musuvathi Microsoft (United States)
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Monica S. Lam
Monica S. Lam Stanford University
Thomas Zimmermann
Thomas Zimmermann Microsoft (United States)
Eyal Ofek
Eyal Ofek Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of related fields and career paths. Many students explore degrees that complement their tech knowledge, such as data science, engineering, or physics. Online programs provide flexibility and can help manage expenses, but costs, quality, and long-term value should be carefully weighed.

For those interested in mechanical engineering, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is essential when choosing an online program. Similarly, students drawn to physics should explore the best online physics degree options to find rigorous yet affordable pathways.

Data science remains popular because of high demand for analytics and AI skills. If cost is a concern, it helps to know what is the cheapest data science course in the us? when comparing online offerings. Electrical engineering is another strong choice, and you can review top online electrical engineering courses USA to identify programs that meet your needs.

Exploring these related degrees can help you broaden your expertise, enhance your career opportunities, and find a pathway that best fits your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Livshits

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles