World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8131 7507 3485 3151 87 5858

Vinod Sahgal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vinod Sahgal between 1974 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vinod Sahgal published across 46 years, from 1974 to 2019, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2004. 1 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2004. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1974 2019

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vinod Sahgal: publications per year, 1974 to 2019
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 3
1981 3
1982 2
1983 5
1984 1
1985 4
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 6
2001 6
2002 1
2003 4
2004 7
2005 7
2006 3
2007 5
2008 2
2009 3
2010 1
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 2
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 93
Download as CSV

Vinod Sahgal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vinod Sahgal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 87 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 87
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Vinod Sahgal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vinod Sahgal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Vinod Sahgal is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the field of medicine. Their published work focuses on epidemiology as a subfield, with an emphasis on traumatic brain injury research.

The scientist's recent publication record includes the article titled Recovery of Function During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury, published in 2020 in the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. This publication has been cited 19 times.

Vinod Sahgal has collaborated frequently with Allen W. Heinemann, contributing together to at least one academic paper. Their work has appeared in the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, which is noted as a primary venue for their publications.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

The scientist's publications and collaborations reflect a focus on clinical and rehabilitative aspects of brain injury treatment, as evidenced by their paper on recovery during inpatient rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • Effects of aging on hand function

    Vinoth K. Ranganathan;Vlodek Siemionow;Vinod Sahgal;Guang H. Yue

  • From mental power to muscle power—gaining strength by using the mind

    Vinoth K. Ranganathan;Vlodek Siemionow;Jing Z. Liu;Vinod Sahgal

  • Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation.

    Te H. Dai;Jing Z. Liu;Vinod Sahgal;Robert W. Brown

  • Human Brain Activation During Sustained and Intermittent Submaximal Fatigue Muscle Contractions: An fMRI Study

    Jing Z. Liu;Zu Y. Shan;Lu D. Zhang;Lu D. Zhang;Vinod Sahgal

  • Relationship between motor activity-related cortical potential and voluntary muscle activation.

    Vlodek Siemionow;Guang H. Yue;Vinoth K. Ranganathan;Jing Z. Liu

  • Greater movement-related cortical potential during human eccentric versus concentric muscle contractions.

    Yin Fang;Yin Fang;Vlodek Siemionow;Vlodek Siemionow;Vinod Sahgal;Fuqin Xiong

  • Distinct brain activation patterns for human maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle actions.

    Yin Fang;Vlodek Siemionow;Vinod Sahgal;Fuqin Xiong

  • Older Adults Exhibit a Reduced Ability to Fully Activate Their Biceps Brachii Muscle

    Guang H. Yue;Vinoth K. Ranganathan;Vlodek Siemionow;Jing Z. Liu

  • Skilled Finger Movement Exercise Improves Hand Function

    Vinoth K. Ranganathan;Vlodek Siemionow;Vinod Sahgal;Jing Z. Liu

  • Functional corticomuscular connection during reaching is weakened following stroke

    Yin Fang;Janis J. Daly;Janis J. Daly;Jiayang Sun;Ken Hvorat

  • Quantifying degeneration of white matter in normal aging using fractal dimension

    Luduan Zhang;Luduan Zhang;David Dean;Jing Z. Liu;Jing Z. Liu;Vinod Sahgal

  • Nonlinear cortical modulation of muscle fatigue: a functional MRI study.

    Jing Z Liu;Te H Dai;Vinod Sahgal;Robert W Brown

  • Simultaneous measurement of human joint force, surface electromyograms, and functional MRI-measured brain activation.

    J.Z Liu;T.H Dai;T.H Dai;T.H Elster;V Sahgal

  • Altered central nervous system signal during motor performance in chronic fatigue syndrome.

    Vlodek Siemionow;Yin Fang;Leonard Calabrese;Vinod Sahgal

  • A three-dimensional fractal analysis method for quantifying white matter structure in human brain.

    Luduan Zhang;Jing Z. Liu;Jing Z. Liu;David Dean;Vinod Sahgal

  • The effects of stroke and age on finger interaction in multi-finger force production tasks.

    Sheng Li;Mark L Latash;Guang H Yue;Vlodek Siemionow

  • Reductions in interhemispheric motor cortex functional connectivity after muscle fatigue.

    Scott J. Peltier;Stephen M. LaConte;Dmitriy M. Niyazov;Jing Z. Liu

  • Weakening of functional corticomuscular coupling during muscle fatigue

    Qi Yang;Yin Fang;Chang Kai Sun;Vlodek Siemionow;Vlodek Siemionow

  • Experimental wound healing with electrical stimulation.

    Steven I. Reger;Akira Hyodo;Shigeharu Negami;Helen E. Kambic

  • Brain activation during human finger extension and flexion movements

    Guang H. Yue;Jing Z. Liu;Vlodek Siemionow;Vinoth K. Ranganathan

Frequent Co-Authors

Guang H. Yue
Guang H. Yue Kessler Foundation
David Dean
David Dean The Ohio State University
Xiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu University of California, Riverside
Eric J. Perreault
Eric J. Perreault Northwestern University
Mindy F. Levin
Mindy F. Levin McGill University
Mark L. Latash
Mark L. Latash Pennsylvania State University
William Z. Rymer
William Z. Rymer Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Gene H. Barnett
Gene H. Barnett Cleveland Clinic
Leonard H. Calabrese
Leonard H. Calabrese Cleveland Clinic
Declan Walsh
Declan Walsh Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, a variety of online degrees and certificates can help you pave a flexible path toward meaningful and lucrative careers. Neuroscience majors often align with some of the highest paying jobs in healthcare, research, and technology—fields that value deep analytical skills and critical thinking.

Many reputable online programs are also available through online colleges that offer financial aid, making advanced study more accessible regardless of your location or budget. If you are looking to boost your qualifications in a specific field, consider exploring what certificates can I get online to enhance your resume quickly and affordably.

Not all promising pathways are complex; some of the easiest college majors can still unlock valuable opportunities in allied health or business, offering a lighter academic load while leading to stable career options. No matter your academic strengths, there’s an online degree or certificate to complement your interest in neuroscience and help you achieve your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Vinod Sahgal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles