World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10271 9613 13 13 245 4255

Joanna Rymaszewska publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joanna Rymaszewska between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joanna Rymaszewska published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2021. 28 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2021. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications
2000 2025

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joanna Rymaszewska: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 9
2003 7
2004 8
2005 7
2006 4
2007 14
2008 11
2009 2
2010 7
2011 5
2012 9
2013 15
2014 11
2015 16
2016 13
2017 17
2018 22
2019 32
2020 25
2021 44
2022 29
2023 19
2024 16
2025 12
Total 357
Download as CSV

Joanna Rymaszewska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Rymaszewska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 245 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 245
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joanna Rymaszewska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Rymaszewska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joanna Rymaszewska is affiliated with Wrocław University of Science and Technology in Poland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a significant focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Neurology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their scholarly work centers on several main topics, including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Rymaszewska has published extensively, with notable recent papers that include:

  • "The SARS-CoV-2 and mental health: From biological mechanisms to social consequences" (2020), published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • "Mental Health of Medical and Non-Medical Professionals during the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study" (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Class of 2020 in Poland: Students' Mental Health during the COVID-19 Outbreak in an Academic Setting" (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Gut microbiota in dementia. Critical review of novel findings and their potential application" (2020), published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • "Psychopathological responses and face mask restrictions during the COVID-19 outbreak: Results from a nationwide survey" (2020), published in Brain Behavior and Immunity

Frequent publication venues for Joanna Rymaszewska include:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Psychiatria Polska
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Throughout their career, Rymaszewska has collaborated extensively with various researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Dorota Szczęśniak
  • Karolina Fila-Witecka
  • Błażej Misiak
  • Rabih Chattat
  • Marta Ciułkowicz

Their work encompasses a range of studies addressing mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, dementia research with an emphasis on gut microbiota, and psychosomatic conditions impacted by societal changes. This broad scope reflects an interdisciplinary approach, integrating biological, psychological, and social factors in health research.

Best Publications

  • Depression and anxiety in coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

    Joanna Rymaszewska;Andrzej Kiejna;Tomasz Hadryś

  • Violence at the workplace--a questionnaire survey of nurses.

    Dorota Merecz;Joanna Rymaszewska;Agnieszka Mościcka;Andrzej Kiejna

  • The SARS-CoV-2 and mental health: From biological mechanisms to social consequences

    Dorota Szcześniak;Anna Gładka;Błażej Misiak;Agnieszka Cyran

  • Impact of air pollution on depression and suicide

    Anna Gładka;Joanna Rymaszewska;Tomasz Zatoński

  • Whole-body cryotherapy as adjunct treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders

    Joanna Rymaszewska;David Ramsey;Sylwia Chładzińska-Kiejna

  • Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial.

    Thomas W. Kallert;Stefan Priebe;Rosemarie Mccabe;Andrzej Kiejna

  • Anserine and carnosine supplementation in the elderly: Effects on cognitive functioning and physical capacity.

    D. Szcześniak;S. Budzeń;W. Kopeć;J. Rymaszewska

  • Bipolar mood disorders among Polish psychiatric outpatients treated for major depression

    Janusz K. Rybakowski;Aleksandra Suwalska;Dorota Lojko;Joanna Rymaszewska

  • Types of depression more frequent in bipolar than in unipolar affective illness: results of the Polish DEP-BI study.

    Janusz K. Rybakowski;Aleksandra Suwalska;Dorota Lojko;Joanna Rymaszewska

  • Mental Health of Medical and Non-Medical Professionals during the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study.

    Julian Maciaszek;Marta Ciulkowicz;Blazej Misiak;Dorota Szczesniak

  • Association between the long-term exposure to air pollution and depression

    Unknown

  • Differences of legal regulations concerning involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in twelve European countries: implications for clinical practice

    Thomas Kallert;Joanna Rymaszewska;Francisco Torres-González

  • Class of 2020 in Poland: Students' Mental Health during the COVID-19 Outbreak in an Academic Setting.

    Tomasz Wieczorek;Agata Kołodziejczyk;Marta Ciułkowicz;Julian Maciaszek

  • The European Training Network ETUDE (Encompassing Training in fUnctional Disorders across Europe): a new research and training program of the EURONET-SOMA network recruiting 15 early stage researchers.

    J G M Rosmalen;C Burton;A Carson;F Cosci

  • A comparison of psychiatric day hospitals in five European countries: implications of their diversity for day hospital research.

    Thomas W. Kallert;Matthias Glöckner;Stefan Priebe;Jane Briscoe

  • Internalized stigma and its correlates among patients with severe mental illness.

    Dorota Szcześniak;Agnieszka Kobyłko;Irena Wojciechowska;Michał Kłapciński

  • Do people with dementia and mild cognitive impairments experience stigma? A cross-cultural investigation between Italy, Poland and the UK

    Katarzyna Małgorzata Lion;Dorota Szcześniak;Katarzyna Bulińska;Shirley Barbara Evans

  • Psychopathological responses and face mask restrictions during the COVID-19 outbreak: Results from a nationwide survey.

    Dorota Szczesniak;Marta Ciulkowicz;Julian Maciaszek;Blazej Misiak

  • Lifestyle Changes among Polish University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Karolina Fila-Witecka;Adrianna Senczyszyn;Agata Kołodziejczyk;Marta Ciułkowicz

  • Coping Styles, Mental Health, and the COVID-19 Quarantine: A Nationwide Survey in Poland

    Agata Kołodziejczyk;Błazej Misiak;Dorota Szcześniak;Julian Maciaszek

  • The impact of the implementation of the Dutch combined Meeting Centres Support Programme for family caregivers of people with dementia in Italy, Poland and UK

    Shirley Evans;Simon Evans;Dawn Brooker;Cate Henderson

  • [Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder].

    Andrzej Kiejna;Joanna Rymaszewska;Monika Kantorska-Janiec;Wojciech Tokarski

Frequent Co-Authors

Rose-Marie Dröes
Rose-Marie Dröes University of Amsterdam
Janusz K. Rybakowski
Janusz K. Rybakowski Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Stefan Priebe
Stefan Priebe Queen Mary University of London
Martin Orrell
Martin Orrell University of Nottingham
Judith G.M. Rosmalen
Judith G.M. Rosmalen University Medical Center Groningen
Jon Stone
Jon Stone University of Edinburgh
Fiammetta Cosci
Fiammetta Cosci University of Florence
Michael Witthöft
Michael Witthöft Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
Ahmed A. Moustafa
Ahmed A. Moustafa Bond University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse opportunities, both online and in-person. Many students are now choosing online psychology programs for flexibility, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments. These online degrees often serve as the foundation for several meaningful careers, such as counseling, mental health services, or therapy.

For example, one popular pathway is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). The journey to becoming an MFT varies significantly by location, and it’s important to understand the different state and city requirements. If you’re interested in learning more, explore how to become an mft in Fort Wayne, or see the steps required in Texas by reading how to become an mft in Fort Worth.

California offers detailed pathways as well, and you can discover more about mft requirements in Fremont or what’s involved in how to become an mft in Fresno. Each region may have its own licensing, education, and clinical experience requirements, so thorough research is essential before choosing your path.

Best Scientists Citing Joanna Rymaszewska

Trending Scientists