World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
78
Citations
18333
World Ranking
1789
National Ranking
185

Jon Stone publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Stone sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 314 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jon Stone D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon Stone is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and specializes in research within the field of medicine, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, philosophy, neurology, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work spans a broad array of interconnected subfields, contributing to the understanding of psychosomatic disorders, mental health, and neurological conditions.

The scientist's research prominently addresses topics such as psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, mental health and psychiatry, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, neurology and historical studies, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and dementia and cognitive impairment research.

Jon Stone has published numerous papers in well-regarded academic journals. Some of their recent significant publications include:

  • Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms (2022), The Lancet Neurology
  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (2020), The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Cerebral venous thrombosis after vaccination against COVID-19 in the UK: a multicentre cohort study (2021), The Lancet
  • Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda (2021), NeuroImage Clinical
  • Functional cognitive disorder: dementia's blind spot (2020), Brain

The frequent publication venues in Jon Stone's career reflect their interdisciplinary focus and impact. These venues include:

  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • European Journal of Neurology
  • Practical Neurology
  • Brain

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Jon Stone's work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Alan Carson
  • Laura McWhirter
  • Ingrid Hoeritzauer
  • Markus Reuber
  • Mark J. Edwards

Jon Stone's extensive publication record and diverse research interests highlight their engagement with complex neurological and psychiatric conditions, with particular attention to clinical and cognitive psychology aspects. Their contributions intersect multiple disciplines, reflecting a broad and detailed examination of mental health and neurology from both clinical and research perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.

    Alberto J. Espay;Selma Aybek;Alan Carson;Mark J. Edwards

  • Who is referred to neurology clinics? - The diagnoses made in 3781 new patients

    Jon C Stone;Alan J Carson;Roderick D D Duncan;Richard C Roberts

  • What should we say to patients with symptoms unexplained by disease? The “number needed to offend”

    Jon Stone;Wojtek Wojcik;Daniel Durrance;Alan Carson

  • Stressful life events and maltreatment in conversion (functional neurological) disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies

    Lea Ludwig;Lea Ludwig;Joëlle A Pasman;Timothy Nicholson;Selma Aybek;Selma Aybek

  • Systematic review of misdiagnosis of conversion symptoms and “hysteria”

    Jon Stone;Roger Smyth;Alan Carson;Steff Lewis

  • Do medically unexplained symptoms matter? A prospective cohort study of 300 new referrals to neurology outpatient clinics

    Alan J Carson;Brigitte Ringbauer;Jon Stone;Lesley McKenzie

  • Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation

    Glenn Nielsen;Jon Stone;Audrey Matthews;Melanie Brown

  • The prognosis of functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms: a systematic review.

    Jeannette Gelauff;Jon Stone;Mark Edwards;Alan Carson

  • Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD): a common, characteristic and treatable cause of chronic dizziness

    Stoyan Popkirov;Jeffrey P Staab;Jon Stone

  • The symptom of functional weakness: a controlled study of 107 patients

    John Stone;Charles Warlow;Michael Sharpe

  • Disability, distress and unemployment in neurology outpatients with symptoms ‘unexplained by organic disease’

    Alan J Carson;Jon C Stone;Carina Hibberd;Gordon Murray

  • Mutations in CTC1, encoding conserved telomere maintenance component 1, cause Coats plus

    Beverley H Anderson;Paul R Kasher;Josephine Mayer;Marcin Szynkiewicz

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Laura H. Goldstein;Emily J. Robinson;John D.C. Mellers;Jon Stone

  • Guided self-help for functional (psychogenic) symptoms: a randomized controlled efficacy trial.

    M Sharpe;J Walker;C Williams;Jon Stone

  • Functional symptoms and signs in neurology: assessment and diagnosis

    J Stone;A Carson;M Sharpe

  • Parry–Romberg syndrome: A global survey of 205 patients using the Internet

    Jon Stone

  • The bare essentials: Functional symptoms in neurology.

    Jon Stone

  • Trick or treat?: Showing patients with functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms their physical signs

    Jon Stone;Mark Edwards

  • Functional neurological disorders: the neurological assessment as treatment

    Jon Stone

  • Functional cognitive disorders: a systematic review.

    Laura McWhirter;Craig Ritchie;Jon Stone;Alan Carson

  • Dual diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of frequency, correlates, and outcomes.

    Mansur A. Kutlubaev;Ying Xu;Ying Xu;Maree L. Hackett;Maree L. Hackett;Jon Stone

  • FMRI in patients with motor conversion symptoms and controls with simulated weakness.

    Jon Stone;Adam Zeman;Enrico Simonotto;Martin Meyer

  • What should we say to patients with symptoms unexplained by disease

    Jon Stone;Wojtek Wojcik;Daniel Durrance;Alan Carson

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Sharpe
Michael Sharpe University of Oxford
Markus Reuber
Markus Reuber University of Sheffield
Laura H. Goldstein
Laura H. Goldstein King's College London
Charles Warlow
Charles Warlow University of Edinburgh
Trudie Chalder
Trudie Chalder King's College London
Mark P. Richardson
Mark P. Richardson King's College London
Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health
Joanna Murray
Joanna Murray King's College London
Marina A.J. Tijssen
Marina A.J. Tijssen University Medical Center Groningen
Sabine Landau
Sabine Landau King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, exploring online degrees and related credentials can open diverse career pathways in both healthcare and research settings. Many professionals pursue interdisciplinary skills by earning degrees in related fields such as psychology, social work, or behavioral analysis.

Flexible and affordable options are increasingly available. For example, those looking for accessible programs may consider cheap online msw programs or a bcba online masters programs if their interests align with mental health or behavioral sciences.

If speed is a priority, accelerated options like a 1 year online master's in social work or a accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology provide pathways to quickly enter the workforce or prepare for further study in neuroscience and related fields.

By combining neuroscience studies with complementary online degrees, students can broaden their expertise, meet licensure requirements, and access a wider range of career opportunities across healthcare, research, and social services sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jon Stone

Trending Scientists