World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4789 4436 510 482 162 11536

Joanna Murray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joanna Murray between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joanna Murray published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 3 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joanna Murray: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 5
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 8
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 9
2010 13
2011 10
2012 11
2013 10
2014 11
2015 8
2016 16
2017 9
2018 6
2019 10
2020 6
2021 13
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 2
Total 191
Download as CSV

Joanna Murray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 162
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joanna Murray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joanna Murray is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine, arts and humanities, with a substantial emphasis on psychiatry and mental health.

Their scholarly contributions span multiple subfields including psychiatry and mental health, philosophy, health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Murray's work addresses a range of topics such as psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, mental health and psychiatry, schizophrenia research and treatment, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and geriatric care and nursing homes.

Frequent publication venues for Murray include:

  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research
  • Health Technology Assessment

Some notable recent papers authored by or involving Joanna Murray include:

  • "Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial" (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • "Psychological and demographic characteristics of 368 patients with dissociative seizures: data from the CODES cohort" (2020, Psychological Medicine)
  • "Improving mental health and reducing antipsychotic use in people with dementia in care homes: the WHELD research programme including two RCTs" (2020, Programme Grants for Applied Research)
  • "Cognitive-behavioural therapy compared with standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures: the CODES RCT" (2021, Health Technology Assessment)
  • "The experience of trial participation, treatment approaches and perceptions of change among participants with dissociative seizures within the CODES randomized controlled trial: A qualitative study" (2020, Epilepsy & Behavior)

Murray collaborates regularly with several researchers including Laura H. Goldstein, Iain Perdue, Jon Stone, Markus Reuber, and Izabela Pilecka, reflecting a network of coauthors that contribute extensively to their areas of investigation.

Best Publications

  • Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology.

    S C Smith;D L Lamping;S Banerjee;R Harwood

  • Sertraline or mirtazapine for depression in dementia (HTA-SADD): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Sube Banerjee;Jennifer Hellier;Michael Dewey;Renee Romeo

  • EUROCARE: a cross-national study of co-resident spouse carers for people with Alzheimer's disease: I—factors associated with carer burden

    Justine Schneider;Joanna Murray;Sube Banerjee;Anthony Mann

  • Quality of life in dementia: more than just cognition. An analysis of associations with quality of life in dementia

    S Banerjee;S C Smith;D L Lamping;R H Harwood

  • Factors associated with the quality of life of family carers of people with dementia: A systematic review

    Nicolas Farina;Thomas E. Page;Stephanie Daley;Anna Brown

  • Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interviews were valid in advanced conditions.

    Irene J. Higginson;Wei Gao;Diana Jackson;Joanna Murray

  • Development of a new measure of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: DEMQOL.

    Sarah Smith;Donna Lamping;Sube Banerjee;Rowan Harwood

  • Diagnostic Overshadowing and Other Challenges Involved in the Diagnostic Process of Patients with Mental Illness Who Present in Emergency Departments with Physical Symptoms – A Qualitative Study

    Guy Shefer;Claire Henderson;Louise M. Howard;Joanna Murray

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Laura H. Goldstein;Emily J. Robinson;John D.C. Mellers;Jon Stone

  • Study of the use of antidepressants for depression in dementia: the HTA-SADD trial - a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sertraline and mirtazapine

    S Banerjee;J Hellier;R Romeo;M Dewey

  • EUROCARE: a cross-national study of co-resident spouse carers for people with Alzheimer's disease: II—a qualitative analysis of the experience of caregiving

    Joanna Murray;Justine Schneider;Sube Banerjee;Anthony Mann

  • Risk Factors for Hospital Admission with RSV Bronchiolitis in England: A Population-Based Birth Cohort Study

    Joanna Murray;Alex Bottle;Mike Sharland;Neena Modi

  • Improving the quality of care for mild to moderate dementia: an evaluation of the Croydon Memory Service Model.

    Sube Banerjee;Rosalind Willis;David Matthews;Faith Contell

  • Experience of caring for someone with anorexia nervosa: qualitative study.

    Jenna Whitney;Joanna Murray;Kay Gavan;Gill Todd

  • Improving quality of life for people with dementia in care homes: making psychosocial interventions work.

    Vanessa Lawrence;Jane Fossey;Clive Ballard;Esme Moniz-Cook

  • Predictors of institutionalisation in people with dementia

    Subrata Banerjee;J Murray;B Foley;L Atkins

  • Impact of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV7) programme on childhood hospital admissions for bacterial pneumonia and empyema in England: national time-trends study, 1997–2008

    Elizabeth Koshy;Joanna Murray;Alex Bottle;Mike Sharland

  • Attitudes and support needs of Black Caribbean, south Asian and White British carers of people with dementia in the UK

    Vanessa Lawrence;Joanna Murray;Kritika Samsi;Sube Banerjee

  • Concepts and Causation of Depression: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Beliefs of Older Adults

    Vanessa Lawrence;Joanna Murray;Sube Banerjee;Sara Turner

  • Primary care professionals’ perceptions of depression in older people: a qualitative study

    Joanna Murray;Sube Banerjee;Richard Byng;Andre Tylee

  • Qualitative Research Methods

    Joanna Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

Sube Banerjee
Sube Banerjee Plymouth University
Anthony Mann
Anthony Mann King's College London
Morven Leese
Morven Leese King's College London
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Azeem Majeed
Azeem Majeed Imperial College London
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Rohan Borschmann
Rohan Borschmann University of Melbourne
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Laura H. Goldstein
Laura H. Goldstein King's College London
Paul Williams
Paul Williams University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a psychology degree, you have a range of online programs to choose from, many of which can prepare you for a rewarding career in counseling. The path to becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC) varies by state and requires specific education, supervised experience, and examination.

For example, the South Dakota licensed professional counselor requirements emphasize graduate course credits and direct client hours. The lpc licensure requirements in Tennessee focus on supervised postgraduate work, while the lpc licensure requirements in Texas require passing state-approved exams and clinical experience. In addition, the lpc license requirements in Utah highlight ethics training along with practicum hours.

Whether your goal is counseling, school psychology, research, or another specialty, understanding your state’s requirements is crucial. Researching online degree programs aligned with these standards can help ensure a smooth transition from study to a professional career.

Best Scientists Citing Joanna Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles