World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael H. Bloch

Michael H. Bloch

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16702 15712 8380 7753 258 22931

Michael H. Bloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael H. Bloch between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael H. Bloch published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2013. 21 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2013. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 5 publications
1993 2026

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael H. Bloch: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 8
2007 4
2008 10
2009 7
2010 6
2011 12
2012 11
2013 25
2014 14
2015 20
2016 13
2017 25
2018 24
2019 24
2020 23
2021 19
2022 14
2023 15
2024 15
2025 16
2026 5
Total 315
Download as CSV

Michael H. Bloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael H. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 258 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 258
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael H. Bloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael H. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael H. Bloch is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary areas at the intersection of psychology, medicine, and neuroscience, focusing extensively on clinical applications.

The main fields of study identified in their body of research include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

The subfields in which they have published most frequently are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Pharmacology

The research topics that have been repeatedly covered in their work include:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Tryptophan and Brain Disorders
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael H. Bloch are:

  • "Efficacy of Intravenous Ketamine in Adolescent Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Midazolam-Controlled Trial" (2021), published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Systematic review and meta-analysis: effects of maternal separation on anxiety-like behavior in rodents" (2020), published in Translational Psychiatry
  • "Annual Research Review: Defining and treating pediatric treatment-resistant depression" (2020), published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • "Pharmacological and behavioral treatment for trichotillomania: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis" (2020), published in Depression and Anxiety
  • "Meta-analysis: Pharmacologic Treatment of Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorders" (2020), published in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The venues encouraging their publication activity with the highest number of contributions include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Translational Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators identified alongside Michael H. Bloch are:

  • Luís C. Farhat
  • Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger
  • Victor J. Avila-Quintero
  • Emily Olfson
  • José M. Flores

Best Publications

  • The effect of antidepressant medication treatment on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines: a meta-analysis

    Jonas Hannestad;Nicole DellaGioia;Michael Bloch

  • Meta-analysis of the symptom structure of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Michael H. Bloch;Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger;Maria C. Rosario;Christopher Pittenger

  • A systematic review : antipsychotic augmentation with treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder

    M H Bloch;A Landeros-Weisenberger;B Kelmendi;V Coric

  • The Effect of a Single Dose of Intravenous Ketamine on Suicidal Ideation: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

    Samuel T. Wilkinson;Elizabeth D. Ballard;Michael H. Bloch;Sanjay J. Mathew

  • Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis

    Paul D. Arnold;Kathleen D. Askland;Cristina Barlassina;Laura Bellodi

  • Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation for the Treatment of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptomatology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Michael H. Bloch;Ahmad Qawasmi

  • Adulthood outcome of tic and obsessive-compulsive symptom severity in children with Tourette syndrome.

    Michael H. Bloch;Bradley S. Peterson;Lawrence Scahill;Jessica Otka

  • Clinical course of Tourette syndrome.

    Michael H. Bloch;James F. Leckman

  • Meta-Analysis: Melatonin for the Treatment of Primary Sleep Disorders

    Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda;Ahmad Qawasmi;Ahmad Qawasmi;Michael H. Bloch

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

    Matthew E. Hirschtritt;Michael H. Bloch;Carol A. Mathews

  • GLUTAMATE ABNORMALITIES IN OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER: NEUROBIOLOGY, PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, AND TREATMENT

    Christopher Pittenger;Michael H. Bloch;Kyle Williams

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Caudate volumes in childhood predict symptom severity in adults with Tourette syndrome.

    Michael H. Bloch;James F. Leckman;Hongtu Zhu;Bradley S. Peterson

  • Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Michael H. Bloch;Jonas Hannestad

  • Systematic review: pharmacological and behavioral treatment for trichotillomania

    Michael H. Bloch;Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger;Philip Dombrowski;Ben Kelmendi

  • Meta-Analysis of the Dose-Response Relationship of SSRI in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Michael H. Bloch;Joseph McGuire;Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger;James F. Leckman

  • Partitioning the heritability of tourette syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder reveals differences in genetic architecture

    Lea K. Davis;Dongmei Yu;Clare L. Keenan;Eric R. Gamazon

  • Meta-analysis: treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with comorbid tic disorders.

    Michael H. Bloch;Kaitlyn E. Panza;Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger;James F. Leckman

  • Global Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Identifies Frontal Cortex, Striatal, and Cerebellar Dysconnectivity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Alan Anticevic;Sien Hu;Sheng Zhang;Aleksandar Savic

  • Tourette syndrome : The self under siege

    James F. Leckman;Michael H. Bloch;Lawrence Scahill;Robert A. King

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Leckman
James F. Leckman Yale University
Christopher Pittenger
Christopher Pittenger Yale University
Euripedes Constantino Miguel
Euripedes Constantino Miguel Universidade de São Paulo
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University
Robert A. King
Robert A. King Yale University
Gerard Sanacora
Gerard Sanacora Yale University
Benjamin D. Greenberg
Benjamin D. Greenberg Brown University
Susanne Walitza
Susanne Walitza University of Zurich
Danielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Benjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up a variety of career pathways, many of which can be pursued through flexible online learning options. Online healthcare degrees are gaining popularity due to their accessibility, affordability, and compatibility with work-life balance.

Nurses looking to advance their practice may consider the cheapest online fnp programs, which prepare students for family nurse practitioner roles while being mindful of cost. For those entering the field or seeking foundational knowledge, a range of online nursing courses provide a convenient starting point.

Ambitious nursing professionals interested in leadership or academic positions can pursue an online phd nursing, which blends advanced research with clinical expertise. Additionally, registered nurses aiming to upgrade their qualifications can benefit from exploring what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online for an affordable path to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

With these online options, aspiring healthcare professionals have more pathways than ever to advance their careers from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Michael H. Bloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles