World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Reininghaus

Ulrich Reininghaus

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4983 4621 228 225 166 10992

Ulrich Reininghaus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrich Reininghaus between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrich Reininghaus published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2024. 74 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 35 publications
1993 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrich Reininghaus: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 4
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 4
2014 11
2015 4
2016 19
2017 10
2018 16
2019 22
2020 22
2021 35
2022 31
2023 28
2024 39
2025 35
Total 295
Download as CSV

Ulrich Reininghaus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Reininghaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 166 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 166
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrich Reininghaus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Reininghaus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ulrich Reininghaus is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research predominantly focuses on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health and Medical Studies

Reininghaus has published papers in numerous respected journals. Some recent publications include:

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap, 2023, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Evidence Synthesis of Digital Interventions to Mitigate the Negative Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Mental Health: Rapid Meta-review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Social isolation, mental health, and use of digital interventions in youth during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally representative survey, 2021, European Psychiatry
  • Mental wellbeing in the German old age population largely unaltered during COVID-19 lockdown: results of a representative survey, 2020, BMC Geriatrics

The frequent venues where Reininghaus publishes work include:

  • Psychological Medicine
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Ulrich Reininghaus collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors active in similar domains. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Anita Schick
  • Inez Myin-Germeys
  • Christian Rauschenberg
  • Craig Morgan
  • Thérèse van Amelsvoort

Their research spans a significant volume, with a notable emphasis on mental health and psychiatric conditions, combining clinical insights with experimental and applied psychological approaches. This breadth reflects a multidisciplinary approach to advancing knowledge and interventions in mental health care.

Best Publications

  • Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments.

    Inez Myin-Germeys;Zuzana Kasanova;Thomas Vaessen;Hugo Vachon

  • Psychosis as a transdiagnostic and extended phenotype in the general population

    Jim van Os;Ulrich Reininghaus

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Stress Sensitivity, Aberrant Salience, and Threat Anticipation in Early Psychosis: An Experience Sampling Study

    Ulrich Reininghaus;Ulrich Reininghaus;Matthew J. Kempton;Lucia Valmaggia;Tom K. J. Craig

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Antipsychotic treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: prevalence, subtypes and predictors.

    Arsime Demjaha;J.M. Lappin;D. Stahl;M.X. Patel

  • Reappraising the Long-term Course and Outcome of Psychotic Disorders: The ÆSOP-10 Study

    Craig Morgan;Julia Lappin;Margaret Heslin;Kim Donoghue

  • Urbanicity, social adversity and psychosis

    Andreas Heinz;Lorenz Deserno;Lorenz Deserno;Ulrich Reininghaus

  • The experience sampling method as an mHealth tool to support self-monitoring, self-insight, and personalized health care in clinical practice

    Jim van Os;Simone Verhagen;Anne Marsman;Frenk Peeters

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • Ecological momentary interventions in psychiatry

    Inez Myin-Germeys;Annelie Klippel;Henrietta Steinhart;Ulrich Reininghaus

  • Mortality in Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses: A 10-Year Follow-up of the ӔSOP First-Episode Cohort

    Ulrich Reininghaus;Rina Dutta;Paola Dazzan;Gillian A. Doody

  • Evidence Synthesis of Digital Interventions to Mitigate the Negative Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Mental Health: Rapid Meta-review.

    Christian Rauschenberg;Anita Schick;Dusan Hirjak;Andreas Seidler

  • Testing the Psychopathology of Psychosis: Evidence for a General Psychosis Dimension

    Ulrich Reininghaus;Stefan Priebe;Richard P. Bentall

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.

    Ashley L. Greene;Nicholas R. Eaton;Kaiqiao Li;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Unemployment, social isolation, achievement–expectation mismatch and psychosis: findings from the ÆSOP Study

    Ulrich A. Reininghaus;Ulrich A. Reininghaus;Craig Morgan;Jayne Simpson;Paola Dazzan

  • Ten-Year Outcomes of First-Episode Psychoses in the MRC ÆSOP-10 Study

    Camice J. Revier;Ulrich Reininghaus;Rina Dutta;Paul Fearon

  • Adversity, cannabis use and psychotic experiences: evidence of cumulative and synergistic effects

    Craig Morgan;Ulrich Reininghaus;Abraham Reichenberg;Souci Frissa

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig Morgan
Craig Morgan King's College London
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Paola Dazzan
Paola Dazzan King's College London
Peter Jones
Peter Jones University of Cambridge
Marta Di Forti
Marta Di Forti King's College London
Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Cathryn M. Lewis
Cathryn M. Lewis King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology often leads students to discover a range of related fields, including social work and counseling. These areas offer tangible career opportunities for those passionate about helping others, whether in community agencies, healthcare, or educational settings. Studying online broadens access to top programs while allowing flexibility for busy schedules.

If you're interested in social work, there are many options available across the country. In New Hampshire, the best online social work degree programs in New Hampshire help students build practical skills for entry-level roles and licensure. For those based in Ohio, you can explore the best online social work degrees in Ohio with a focus on both theory and fieldwork. Texas residents may be interested in a wide variety of choices designed to meet state-specific requirements, as seen in the best online social work degrees in Texas.

More broadly, students from all states can consider the top online social work degrees in America, offering nationally recognized programs with flexible coursework. Earning an online degree in related fields such as social work not only complements your psychology studies but also opens doors to impactful and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Reininghaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles