World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc A. T. Muskavitch

Marc A. T. Muskavitch

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
44
Citations
9627
World Ranking
4252
National Ranking
1833

Marc A. T. Muskavitch publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. T. Muskavitch sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 67 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Marc A. T. Muskavitch D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. T. Muskavitch sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc A. T. Muskavitch is affiliated with Biogen in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on intersecting fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable contributions to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, oncology, and cancer research.

Their work centers around topics including lung cancer treatments and mutations, lung cancer research studies, bioinformatics and genomic networks, cancer genomics and diagnostics, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, and 14-3-3 protein interactions.

Recent publications by Marc A. T. Muskavitch include the following:

  • P2.16F.01 Patient-Led Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer Translational Research to Expedite Therapeutic Development, 2024, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Patient-led advocacy in ALK-positive lung cancer, 2023, Translational Lung Cancer Research
  • Next-generation Drosophila protein interactome map and its functional implications, 2024, Developmental Cell
  • Next-Generation Drosophila Protein Interactome Map and Its Functional Implications, 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • 513 Comprehensive genomic and immune profiling of ALK fusion-positive and negative lung adenocarcinomas, 2023, Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include:

  • Emily S. Venanzi
  • R.B. Hall
  • Kejie Li
  • G. Jayarama Bhat
  • George Locke

Publications by Marc A. T. Muskavitch have appeared in venues such as:

  • Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Translational Lung Cancer Research
  • Developmental Cell
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Molecular interactions between the protein products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, two EGF-homologous genes in Drosophila

    Richard G. Fehon;Pamela J. Kooh;Ilaria Rebay;Cathy L. Regan

  • Ligand endocytosis drives receptor dissociation and activation in the Notch pathway.

    A.L. Parks;K.M. Klueg;J.R. Stout;M.A. Muskavitch

  • Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes

    Daniel E. Neafsey;Robert M. Waterhouse;Mohammad R. Abai;Sergey S. Aganezov

  • Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus Establishes a Platform for Mosquito Comparative Genomics

    Peter Arensburger;Karine Megy;Robert M Waterhouse;Robert M Waterhouse;Jenica Abrudan

  • Delta-notch signaling and Drosophila cell fate choice.

    Marc A.T. Muskavitch

  • Delta, a Drosophila neurogenic gene, is transcriptionally complex and encodes a protein related to blood coagulation factors and epidermal growth factor of vertebrates.

    C. C. Kopczynski;A. K. Alton;K. Fechtel;P. J. Kooh

  • CYP6 P450 enzymes and ACE-1 duplication produce extreme and multiple insecticide resistance in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

    Constant V. Edi;Luc Djogbénou;Adam M. Jenkins;Kimberly Regna

  • Implications of dynamic patterns of Delta and Notch expression for cellular interactions during Drosophila development

    P. J. Kooh;R. G. Fehon;M. A. T. Muskavitch

  • Notch: The Past, the Present, and the Future

    Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas;Marc A T Muskavitch

  • Feedback regulation is central to Delta-Notch signalling required for Drosophila wing vein morphogenesis.

    Stacey S. Huppert;Thomas L. Jacobsen;Marc A. T. Muskavitch

  • Molecular cloning of Notch, a locus affecting neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

    Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas;Marc A. T. Muskavitch;Barry Yedvobnick

  • neuralized Encodes a peripheral membrane protein involved in delta signaling and endocytosis.

    Elias Pavlopoulos;Elias Pavlopoulos;Chrysoula Pitsouli;Chrysoula Pitsouli;Kristin M. Klueg;Marc A.T. Muskavitch

  • Cis-interactions between Delta and Notch modulate neurogenic signalling in Drosophila

    Thomas L. Jacobsen;Keith Brennan;Alfonso Martinez Arias;Marc A T Muskavitch

  • Modulation of TRPA1 thermal sensitivity enables sensory discrimination in Drosophila.

    Kyeongjin Kang;Vincent C. Panzano;Elaine C. Chang;Lina Ni

  • Pathogenomics of Culex quinquefasciatus and Meta-Analysis of Infection Responses to Diverse Pathogens

    Lyric C. Bartholomay;Robert M. Waterhouse;Robert M. Waterhouse;Robert M. Waterhouse;George F. Mayhew;Corey L. Campbell

  • SNP genotyping defines complex gene-flow boundaries among African malaria vector mosquitoes.

    D. E. Neafsey;M. K. N. Lawniczak;D. J. Park;S. N. Redmond

  • An expandable gene that encodes a Drosophila glue protein is not expressed in variants lacking remote upstream sequences

    Marc A.T. Muskavitch;David S. Hogness

  • Relationships between complex Delta expression and the specification of retinal cell fates during Drosophila eye development.

    Annette L. Parks;F.Rudolf Turner;Marc A.T. Muskavitch

  • Ligand-receptor interactions and trans-endocytosis of Delta, Serrate and Notch: members of the Notch signalling pathway in Drosophila.

    Kristin M. Klueg;Marc A. T. Muskavitch

  • Metabolic and target-site mechanisms combine to confer strong DDT resistance in Anopheles gambiae.

    Sara N. Mitchell;Daniel J. Rigden;Andrew J. Dowd;Fang Lu

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Fehon
Richard G. Fehon University of Chicago
Robert M. Waterhouse
Robert M. Waterhouse Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Daniel E. Neafsey
Daniel E. Neafsey Broad Institute
Dyann F. Wirth
Dyann F. Wirth Harvard University
Evgeny M. Zdobnov
Evgeny M. Zdobnov Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
David J. Conway
David J. Conway London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas Harvard University
George K. Christophides
George K. Christophides Imperial College London
Hilary Ranson
Hilary Ranson Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Sarah K. Volkman
Sarah K. Volkman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to numerous health science careers. If you’re considering expanding your qualifications, a range of related online degrees and fast-track healthcare programs can help diversify your career options.

For those interested in nursing, you may be curious: do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? Fortunately, there are nursing schools with flexible entry requirements, making nursing more accessible.

Aspiring healthcare leaders can also pursue cheap mha programs online for an affordable path into healthcare administration roles. Additionally, fast-track lpn programs online offer accelerated entry into practical nursing and patient care.

For advanced research or academic careers, there’s growing interest in phd in nursing online programs, making it possible to reach the highest educational levels without disrupting your current career.

Whether you aim to enter patient care, administration, or research, these online pathways make health science careers more flexible, affordable, and accessible for Genetics graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Marc A. T. Muskavitch

Trending Scientists