World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
33050
World Ranking
7341
National Ranking
3196

Hovav Shacham publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hovav Shacham sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 94 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hovav Shacham D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hovav Shacham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hovav Shacham is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Signal Processing, Software, and Information Systems.

The research topics covered by Shacham include:

  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security

Recent papers authored by Shacham and collaborators include:

  • "Hertzbleed: Turning Power Side-Channel Attacks Into Remote Timing Attacks on x86" (2023), published in IEEE Micro
  • "Automated policy synthesis for system call sandboxing" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Swivel: Hardening WebAssembly against Spectre" (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Towards a Verified Range Analysis for JavaScript JITs: Artifact" (2020), published in Artifact Digital Object Group
  • "Constant-Time Wasmtime, for Real This Time: End-to-End Verified Zero-Overhead Constant-Time Programming for the Web and Beyond" (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors working with Shacham include:

  • Deian Stefan
  • Shravan Narayan
  • Craig Disselkoen
  • Sorin Lerner
  • Garrett Gu

Shacham's publications appear most often in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Micro, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, and Artifact Digital Object Group.

Best Publications

  • Short Signatures from the Weil Pairing

    Dan Boneh;Ben Lynn;Hovav Shacham

  • Hey, you, get off of my cloud: exploring information leakage in third-party compute clouds

    Thomas Ristenpart;Eran Tromer;Hovav Shacham;Stefan Savage

  • Short Group Signatures.

    Dan Boneh;Xavier Boyen;Hovav Shacham

  • Aggregate and verifiably encrypted signatures from bilinear maps

    Dan Boneh;Craig Gentry;Ben Lynn;Hovav Shacham

  • Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile

    Karl Koscher;Alexei Czeskis;Franziska Roesner;Shwetak Patel

  • Compact Proofs of Retrievability

    Hovav Shacham;Brent Waters

  • Comprehensive experimental analyses of automotive attack surfaces

    Stephen Checkoway;Damon McCoy;Brian Kantor;Danny Anderson

  • The geometry of innocent flesh on the bone: return-into-libc without function calls (on the x86)

    Hovav Shacham

  • On the effectiveness of address-space randomization

    Hovav Shacham;Matthew Page;Ben Pfaff;Eu-Jin Goh

  • Group signatures with verifier-local revocation

    Dan Boneh;Hovav Shacham

  • SiRiUS: Securing Remote Untrusted Storage.

    Eu-Jin Goh;Hovav Shacham;Nagendra Modadugu;Dan Boneh

  • Return-oriented programming without returns

    Stephen Checkoway;Lucas Davi;Alexandra Dmitrienko;Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi

  • Return-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications

    Ryan Roemer;Erik Buchanan;Hovav Shacham;Stefan Savage

  • When good instructions go bad: generalizing return-oriented programming to RISC

    Erik Buchanan;Ryan Roemer;Hovav Shacham;Stefan Savage

  • Sequential aggregate signatures from trapdoor permutations

    Anna Lysyanskaya;Silvio Micali;Leonid Reyzin;Hovav Shacham

  • Sequential Aggregate Signatures and Multisignatures without Random Oracles.

    Steve Lu;Rafail Ostrovsky;Amit Sahai;Hovav Shacham

  • Randomizable Proofs and Delegatable Anonymous Credentials

    Mira Belenkiy;Jan Camenisch;Melissa Chase;Markulf Kohlweiss

  • Iago attacks: why the system call API is a bad untrusted RPC interface

    Stephen Checkoway;Hovav Shacham

  • An empirical study of privacy-violating information flows in JavaScript web applications

    Dongseok Jang;Ranjit Jhala;Sorin Lerner;Hovav Shacham

  • On Subnormal Floating Point and Abnormal Timing

    Marc Andrysco;David Kohlbrenner;Keaton Mowery;Ranjit Jhala

  • Eliminating fine grained timers in Xen

    Bhanu C. Vattikonda;Sambit Das;Hovav Shacham

Frequent Co-Authors

Brent Waters
Brent Waters The University of Texas at Austin
Dan Boneh
Dan Boneh Stanford University
Stefan Savage
Stefan Savage University of California, San Diego
Anna Lysyanskaya
Anna Lysyanskaya Brown University
Thomas Ristenpart
Thomas Ristenpart Cornell University
Xavier Boyen
Xavier Boyen Queensland University of Technology
Amit Sahai
Amit Sahai University of California, Los Angeles
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles
Matthew Green
Matthew Green Johns Hopkins University
Leonid Reyzin
Leonid Reyzin Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in expanding your education or exploring career pathways related to computer science, there are many flexible online options to consider. For those looking for a fast track, there are 6 month associate degree online programs that can help you get started quickly in technical fields.

Business skills are often highly valued in tech careers, and the best online business degree programs offer flexible schedules and affordability for working professionals. Budget-conscious students might seek the cheapest bachelor degree programs, which can vastly reduce student loan debt while still delivering a reputable education.

For those interested in engineering or related technical areas, a cheap online engineering degree could open doors to high-demand STEM careers. Carefully compare program costs, accreditation, and career outcomes to choose the pathway that best fits your needs and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Hovav Shacham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles