World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
8594
World Ranking
2439
National Ranking
1022

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
8809
World Ranking
7549
National Ranking
2069

Stanley Zionts publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Zionts sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 117 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Stanley Zionts D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Zionts sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Stanley Zionts is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their academic and research career is associated with this institution.

In 2006, Stanley Zionts was recognized as a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS).

Best Publications

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead

    Jyrki Wallenius;James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer

  • An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem

    Stanley Zionts;Jyrki Wallenius

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years

    James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer;Jyrki Wallenius

  • An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions

    Stanley Zionts;Jyrki Wallenius

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century

    M. Murat Köksalan;Jyrki Wallenius;Stanley Zionts

  • Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance

    Chien H. Wang;Ram D. Gopal;Stanley Zionts

  • Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem using Convex Cones

    Pekka Korhonen;Jyrki Wallenius;Stanley Zionts

  • An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making

    Vahid Lotfi;Theodor J. Stewart;Stanley Zionts

  • A Lagrangean Relaxation Approach for Very-Large-Scale Capacitated Lot-Sizing

    Moustapha Diaby;Harish C. Bahl;Mark H. Karwan;Stanley Zionts

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium

    Murat Köksalan;Stanley Zionts

  • A multiple criteria method for choosing among discrete alternatives

    Stanley Zionts

  • Identifying Efficient Vectors: Some Theory and Computational Results

    Stanley Zionts;Jyrki Wallenius

  • Capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling by Lagrangean relaxation

    M. Diaby;H.C. Bahl;M.H. Karwan;S. Zionts

  • Redundancy in Mathematical Programming

    Mark H. Karwan;Vahid Lotfi;Stanley Zionts;Jan Telgen

  • MCDM---If Not a Roman Numeral, Then What?

    Stanley Zionts

  • The Criss-Cross Method for Solving Linear Programming Problems

    Stanley Zionts

  • An improved method for solving multiple criteria problems involving discrete alternatives

    M. M. Koksalan;M. H. Karwan;S. Zionts

  • An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support

    Tawfik Jelassi;Gregory Kersten;Stanley Zionts

  • Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods

    Harri Ehtamo;Raimo P. Hämäläinen;Pirja Heiskanen;Jeffrey Teich

  • An early history of multiple criteria decision making

    Murat Köksalan;Jyrki Wallenius;Stanley Zionts

  • Multiple criteria mathematical programming: an updated overview and several approaches

    Stanley Zionts

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using MicroComputers

    Birsen Karpak;Stanley Zionts

  • Programming with linear fractional functionals

    Stanley Zionts

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramamoorthy Ramesh
Ramamoorthy Ramesh Rice University
Jyrki Wallenius
Jyrki Wallenius Aalto University
Pekka Korhonen
Pekka Korhonen Aalto University
Ram D. Gopal
Ram D. Gopal University of Warwick
Emanuele Borgonovo
Emanuele Borgonovo Bocconi University
Ralph E. Steuer
Ralph E. Steuer University of Georgia
Peter C. Fishburn
Peter C. Fishburn AT&T (United States)
Raimo P. Hämäläinen
Raimo P. Hämäläinen Aalto University
Yacov Y. Haimes
Yacov Y. Haimes University of Virginia
Kalyanmoy Deb
Kalyanmoy Deb Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to various online graduate programs that complement analytical skills with business acumen. For those interested in leadership roles, exploring the fastest mba online programs can be an efficient way to gain management expertise while leveraging mathematical problem-solving abilities.

Finance professionals with strong quantitative backgrounds may find value in the best online masters in finance, which combine mathematical models with financial theory for careers in investment, risk analysis, and financial planning.

Marketing is another vibrant field where data analytics play a crucial role. Earning a masters in marketing online can help Mathematics graduates apply their skills in market research, consumer behavior analysis, and strategic marketing.

For those aiming at executive leadership or entrepreneurial ventures, affordable and reputable options like the cheapest aacsb online dba programs provide rigorous business education designed to advance careers while balancing budget considerations.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Zionts

Recently Published Articles