World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 50 2088 1920 59 58 156 14484

Michel Chalot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michel Chalot between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michel Chalot published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 16 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications
1988 2025

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michel Chalot: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 3
1992 2
1993 0
1994 4
1995 6
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 5
2004 4
2005 1
2006 7
2007 8
2008 5
2009 1
2010 3
2011 9
2012 13
2013 4
2014 10
2015 3
2016 7
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 9
2021 6
2022 6
2023 6
2024 5
2025 11
Total 187
Download as CSV

Michel Chalot publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Chalot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 156–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 156 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151 156
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Michel Chalot D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Chalot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122 50
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Enzyme
  • Gene

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Biochemistry, Mycorrhiza, Paxillus involutus and Ectomycorrhiza. His studies deal with areas such as Laccaria bicolor, Genome, Gene, Populus trichocarpa and Symbiosis as well as Botany. His Symbiosis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Regulation of gene expression and Fungus.

His Paxillus involutus research includes themes of Complementation, Suillus variegatus and Mycelium. Michel Chalot has included themes like Nitrogen cycle and Metabolism in his Ectomycorrhiza study. The various areas that he examines in his Metallothionein study include Glutathione and Mutant.

His most cited work include:

  • The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis (798 citations)
  • Physiology of organic nitrogen acquisition by ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas (304 citations)
  • Phylogenetic and functional analysis of the Cation Diffusion Facilitator (CDF) family: improved signature and prediction of substrate specificity. (243 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Biochemistry, Mycorrhiza, Biomass and Agronomy. His work in the fields of Botany, such as Fungus, overlaps with other areas such as Context. His study in the fields of Glutamine synthetase, Glutamine, Enzyme and Nitrogen assimilation under the domain of Biochemistry overlaps with other disciplines such as Heterologous expression.

His Mycorrhiza study combines topics in areas such as Mycelium and Hypha. The study incorporates disciplines such as Waste management, Contamination, Soil contamination, Phytoremediation and Nutrient in addition to Biomass. The concepts of his Agronomy study are interwoven with issues in Soil water, Inoculation and Bioremediation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (65.32%)
  • Biochemistry (27.17%)
  • Mycorrhiza (11.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Botany (65.32%)
  • Agronomy (19.08%)
  • Revegetation (11.56%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Botany, Agronomy, Revegetation, Tailings and Nutrient. He combines Botany and Context in his research. His Agronomy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biomass, Short rotation coppice, Ulmus pumila and Ostrya carpinifolia.

His research investigates the link between Revegetation and topics such as Betula pendula that cross with problems in Russulaceae, Pyronemataceae, Salix purpurea and Topsoil. His Nutrient research incorporates themes from Environmental chemistry and Bioaccumulation. As a part of the same scientific family, Michel Chalot mostly works in the field of Microorganism, focusing on Fungus and, on occasion, Dark septate endophyte.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Bacterial diversity associated with poplar trees grown on a Hg-contaminated site: Community characterization and isolation of Hg-resistant plant growth-promoting bacteria (24 citations)
  • Bacterial diversity associated with poplar trees grown on a Hg-contaminated site: Community characterization and isolation of Hg-resistant plant growth-promoting bacteria (24 citations)
  • Inhabiting plant roots, nematodes, and truffles-Polyphilus, a new helotialean genus with two globally distributed species. (15 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Botany
  • Ecology

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Rhizosphere, Soil microbiology, Dark septate endophyte and Microorganism. His Botany research includes elements of Organic matter and Soil water. His Rhizosphere study incorporates themes from Inoculation, Shoot, Horticulture and Glomeromycota.

As part of his studies on Soil microbiology, he often connects relevant areas like Lolium perenne. His Dark septate endophyte research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Phialophora, Biological pest control and Fungus. His research on Microorganism frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Heterobasidion annosum.

Best Publications

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)

    G. A. Tuskan;G. A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

  • The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis

    F. Martin;A. Aerts;D. Ahrén;A. Brun

  • Physiology of organic nitrogen acquisition by ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas

    Michel Chalot;Annick Brun

  • A secretory pathway-localized cation diffusion facilitator confers plant manganese tolerance

    Edgar Peiter;Barbara Montanini;Anthony Gobert;Pai Pedas

  • Cadmium uptake and subcellular compartmentation in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus.

    Damien Blaudez;Bernard Botton;Michel Chalot

  • Poplar metal tolerance protein 1 confers zinc tolerance and is an oligomeric vacuolar zinc transporter with an essential leucine zipper motif.

    Damien Blaudez;Annegret Kohler;Francis Martin;Dale Sanders

  • The expanded family of ammonium transporters in the perennial poplar plant

    Jérémy Couturier;Barbara Montanini;Francis Martin;Annick Brun

  • Differential responses of ectomycorrhizal fungi to heavy metals in vitro

    D. Blaudez;C. Jacob;K. Turnau;J.V. Colpaert

  • Ammonia: a candidate for nitrogen transfer at the mycorrhizal interface.

    Michel Chalot;Damien Blaudez;Annick Brun

  • Molecular characterization, function and regulation of ammonium transporters (Amt) and ammonium‐metabolizing enzymes (GS, NADP‐GDH) in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum

    Arnaud Javelle;Mélanie Morel;Blanca-Rosa Rodríguez-Pastrana;Bernard Botton

  • Cadmium-responsive thiols in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus.

    Mikael Courbot;Laurent Diez;Roberta Ruotolo;Michel Chalot

  • Structure and expression profile of the phosphate Pht1 transporter gene family in mycorrhizal Populus trichocarpa

    Verónica Loth-Pereda;Elena Orsini;Pierre-Emmanuel Courty;Frédéric Lota

  • Cloning and expression of multiple metallothioneins from hybrid poplar

    Annegret Kohler;Damien Blaudez;Michel Chalot;Francis Martin

  • The arbuscular mycorrhizal status has an impact on the transcriptome profile and amino acid composition of tomato fruit

    Alessandra Salvioli;Inès Zouari;Michel Chalot;Paola Bonfante

  • Plant growth promotion, metabolite production and metal tolerance of dark septate endophytes isolated from metal-polluted poplar phytomanagement sites.

    Charlotte Berthelot;Corinne Leyval;Julie Foulon;Michel Chalot

  • Genome-wide analysis of plant metal transporters, with an emphasis on poplar.

    Aude Migeon;Damien Blaudez;Olivia Wilkins;Barbara Montanini

  • Metal Accumulation by Woody Species on Contaminated Sites in the North of France

    Aude Migeon;Pierre Richaud;Frédéric Guinet;Michel Chalot

  • Ectomycorrhizal mycelia reduce bacterial activity in a sandy soil

    Pål Axel Olsson;Michel Chalot;Erland Bååth;Roger D. Finlay

  • Metal induction of a Paxillus involutus metallothionein and its heterologous expression in Hebeloma cylindrosporum.

    Marc Bellion;Mikael Courbot;Christophe Jacob;Frédéric Guinet

  • An update on nutrient transport processes in ectomycorrhizas

    Michel Chalot;Arnaud Javelle;Damien Blaudez;Raphaël Lambilliote

  • A gene repertoire for nitrogen transporters in Laccaria bicolor.

    Eva Lucic;Claire Fourrey;Annegret Kohler;Francis Martin

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) - eScholarship

    G.A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Pierre Richaud
Pierre Richaud Aix-Marseille University
Annegret Kohler
Annegret Kohler University of Lorraine
Daniel Wipf
Daniel Wipf Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Bengt Söderström
Bengt Söderström Lund University
Corinne Leyval
Corinne Leyval University of Lorraine
Pierre Dizengremel
Pierre Dizengremel University of Lorraine
Roger D. Finlay
Roger D. Finlay Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Pierre-Emmanuel Courty
Pierre-Emmanuel Courty INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Bernard Dell
Bernard Dell Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michel Chalot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles