World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matteo Caleo

Matteo Caleo

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
9422
World Ranking
5345
National Ranking
265

Matteo Caleo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Caleo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 203 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matteo Caleo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Caleo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matteo Caleo is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and specializes in neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans various subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, and rehabilitation. The scientist's work covers key topics such as neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neural dynamics and brain function, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, neuroscience and neural engineering, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, as well as neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

Recent publications by Matteo Caleo illustrate a focus on both fundamental and applied aspects of neuroscience. These include:

  • Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function, 2020, Neuron
  • The functional characterization of callosal connections, 2021, Progress in Neurobiology
  • Differential roles of pyramidal and fast-spiking, GABAergic neurons in the control of glioma cell proliferation, 2020, Neurobiology of Disease
  • Glial-fibrillary-acidic-protein (GFAP) biomarker detection in serum-matrix: Functionalization strategies and detection by an ultra-high-frequency surface-acoustic-wave (UHF-SAW) lab-on-chip, 2020, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
  • Experimental and Computational Study on Motor Control and Recovery After Stroke: Toward a Constructive Loop Between Experimental and Virtual Embodied Neuroscience, 2020, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuro-Oncology, Neurobiology of Disease, Toxicon, and Progress in Neurobiology.

Matteo Caleo has collaborated extensively with several researchers, indicating a multidisciplinary approach to neuroscience research. Frequent co-authors include Eleonora Vannini, Cristina Spalletti, Silvestro Micera, Alberto Mazzoni, and Laura Restani.

Best Publications

  • Environmental enrichment strengthens corticocortical interactions and reduces amyloid-β oligomers in aged mice

    Marco Mainardi;Angelo Di Garbo;Matteo Caleo;Nicoletta Berardi

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is required for the enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis following environmental enrichment

    Chiara Rossi;Andrea Angelucci;Laura Costantin;Chiara Braschi

  • Long-Distance Retrograde Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin A

    Flavia Antonucci;Chiara Rossi;Laura Gianfranceschi;Ornella Rossetto

  • Microvesicles released from microglia stimulate synaptic activity via enhanced sphingolipid metabolism

    Flavia Antonucci;Elena Turola;Loredana Riganti;Matteo Caleo

  • Neuroplastic Changes Following Brain Ischemia and their Contribution to Stroke Recovery: Novel Approaches in Neurorehabilitation

    Claudia Alia;Cristina Spalletti;Stefano Lai;Alessandro Panarese

  • Botulinum Neurotoxins A and E Undergo Retrograde Axonal Transport in Primary Motor Neurons

    Laura Restani;Francesco Giribaldi;Maria Manich;Maria Manich;Kinga Bercsenyi

  • Neuroinflammatory targets and treatments for epilepsy validated in experimental models

    Eleonora Aronica;Sebastian Bauer;Yuri Bozzi;Yuri Bozzi;Matteo Caleo

  • A Radial Glia-Specific Role of RhoA in Double Cortex Formation

    Silvia Cappello;Christian R.J. Böhringer;Matteo Bergami;Karl-Klaus Conzelmann

  • Evidence for anterograde transport and transcytosis of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A).

    Laura Restani;Flavia Antonucci;Laura Gianfranceschi;Chiara Rossi

  • Epilepsy as a Neurodevelopmental Disorder

    Yuri Bozzi;Simona Casarosa;Simona Casarosa;Matteo Caleo

  • Randomized trial on the effects of a combined physical/cognitive training in aged MCI subjects: the Train the Brain study

    L. Maffei;E. Picano;M. G. Andreassi;A. Angelucci

  • Synergistic Effects of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Chondroitinase ABC on Retinal Fiber Sprouting after Denervation of the Superior Colliculus in Adult Rats

    Daniela Tropea;Matteo Caleo;Lamberto Maffei

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is an anterograde survival factor in the rat visual system

    Matteo Caleo;Elisabetta Menna;Sabrina Chierzi;Maria Cristina Cenni

  • Acute retinal ganglion cell injury caused by intraocular pressure spikes is mediated by endogenous extracellular ATP

    Valentina Resta;Elena Novelli;Giovanni Vozzi;Cristiano Scarpa

  • Early depolarizing GABA controls critical-period plasticity in the rat visual cortex

    Gabriele Deidda;Manuela Allegra;Chiara Cerri;Shovan Naskar

  • The Chemokine CCL2 Mediates the Seizure-enhancing Effects of Systemic Inflammation.

    Chiara Cerri;Sacha Genovesi;Manuela Allegra;Francesco Pistillo

  • Central effects of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins

    Matteo Caleo;Giampietro Schiavo

  • More than at the Neuromuscular Synapse Actions of Botulinum Neurotoxin A in the Central Nervous System

    Riccardo Mazzocchio;Matteo Caleo

  • AP2gamma regulates basal progenitor fate in a region- and layer-specific manner in the developing cortex.

    Luisa Pinto;Daniela Drechsel;Marie-Theres Schmid;Jovica Ninkovic

  • Epileptiform Activity and Cognitive Deficits in SNAP-25+/− Mice are Normalized by Antiepileptic Drugs

    Irene Corradini;Andrea Donzelli;Flavia Antonucci;Hans Welzl

  • Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function

    Silvestro Micera;Silvestro Micera;Matteo Caleo;Carmelo Chisari;Friedhelm C. Hummel

  • Antiepileptic Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin E

    Laura Costantin;Yuri Bozzi;Cristina Richichi;Alessandro Viegi

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvestro Micera
Silvestro Micera Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Lamberto Maffei
Lamberto Maffei National Research Council (CNR)
Yuri Bozzi
Yuri Bozzi University of Trento
Ornella Rossetto
Ornella Rossetto University of Padua
Simone Rossi
Simone Rossi University of Siena
Claudia Verderio
Claudia Verderio University of Milan
Michela Matteoli
Michela Matteoli Humanitas University
Giampietro Schiavo
Giampietro Schiavo University College London
Nicoletta Berardi
Nicoletta Berardi University of Florence
Alberto Priori
Alberto Priori University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the growing demand for neuroscience professionals, a range of online degrees and credentials can support your career goals. For those seeking practical skills in a short period, certificate programs online are an efficient way to boost your expertise and earning potential. These certificates often focus on specialized areas relevant to neuroscience, healthcare, or data analysis.

If flexibility and ease of completion are top priorities, consider exploring the easiest degree to get online. Many of these programs offer remote coursework and accelerated schedules suitable for working professionals or career-changers interested in neuroscience-adjacent fields.

For those interested in brain health and behavioral sciences, degrees like social work or applied behavior analysis can be a natural fit. The availability of cheap online msw programs opens up advanced training in mental health support, while the cheapest bcba online program prepares you for credentialing in behavioral analysis—both valuable for neuroscience careers.

Whether advancing your qualifications or changing specialties, strategically chosen online degrees and certificates can lead to exciting and diverse pathways in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matteo Caleo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles