World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
57
Citations
39829
World Ranking
3348
National Ranking
1450

William R. Pearson publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Pearson sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

William R. Pearson D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Pearson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the International Society for Computational Biology
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William R. Pearson is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a notable focus on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Genetics, and Biomedical Engineering as subfields.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by William R. Pearson include:

  • "Ten Years of Collaborative Progress in the Quest for Orthologs," 2021, published in Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • "Comparison of Detection Methods and Genome Quality when Quantifying Nuclear Mitochondrial Insertions in Vertebrate Genomes," 2022, published in Frontiers in Genetics
  • "Making Change Sustainable: Network for Integrating Bioinformatics into Life Sciences Education (NIBLSE) Meeting Review," 2022, published in CourseSource
  • "Improved Selection of Canonical Proteins for Reference Proteomes," 2024, published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • "Improved Selection of Canonical Proteins for Reference Proteomes," 2024, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequently encountered co-authors in their research include María Martin, Benjamin Linard, Ingo Ebersberger, Shawn E. McGlynn, and Natasha Glover.

The scientist has published in several venues repeatedly, such as:

  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Frontiers in Genetics
  • CourseSource
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

William R. Pearson has been recognized with the following awards:

  • Fellow of the International Society for Computational Biology, 2018
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2007

Best Publications

  • Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

    William R. Pearson;David J. Lipman

  • Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches

    David J. Lipman;William R. Pearson

  • Rapid and Sensitive Sequence Comparison with FASTP and FASTA.

    William R. Pearson

  • Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

    Alex Bateman;William R. Pearson;Lincoln D. Stein;Gary D. Stormo

  • Hereditary differences in the expression of the human glutathione transferase active on trans-stilbene oxide are due to a gene deletion.

    Janeric Seidegard;William R. Vorachek;Ronald W. Pero;William R. Pearson

  • An Introduction to Sequence Similarity (“Homology”) Searching

    William R. Pearson

  • NOMENCLATURE FOR HUMAN GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASES

    B Mannervik;Y C Awasthi;P G Board;J D Hayes

  • Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package.

    William R. Pearson

  • Searching Protein Sequence Libraries: Comparison of the Sensitivity and Selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA Algorithms

    William R. Pearson

  • Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences

    William R. Pearson;Todd Wood;Zheng Zhang;Webb Miller

  • The genome of Cryptosporidium hominis

    Ping Xu;Giovanni Widmer;Yingping Wang;Luiz S. Ozaki

  • Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases

    William R. Pearson

  • Effective protein sequence comparison.

    William R. Pearson

  • Empirical statistical estimates for sequence similarity searches.

    William R Pearson

  • Nomenclature for mammalian soluble glutathione transferases.

    Bengt Mannervik;Philip G. Board;John D. Hayes;Irving Listowsky

  • Using the FASTA program to search protein and DNA sequence databases.

    William R. Pearson

  • Identification of class-mu glutathione transferase genes GSTM1-GSTM5 on human chromosome 1p13.

    W.R. Pearson;W.R. Vorachek;Shi-jie Xu;R. Berger

  • Characterization of the human class Mu glutathione S-transferase gene cluster and the GSTM1 deletion.

    Shi-jie Xu;Ying-ping Wang;Bruce Roe;William R. Pearson

  • Getting More from Less Algorithms for Rapid Protein Identification with Multiple Short Peptide Sequences

    Aaron J. Mackey;Timothy A.J. Haystead;William R. Pearson

  • Aligning two sequences within a specified diagonal band.

    Kun-Mao Chao;William R. Pearson;Webb Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

James Bonner
James Bonner California Institute of Technology
Bengt Mannervik
Bengt Mannervik Stockholm University
Webb Miller
Webb Miller Pennsylvania State University
Philip G. Board
Philip G. Board Australian National University
Eric W. Triplett
Eric W. Triplett University of Florida
Timothy A. J. Haystead
Timothy A. J. Haystead Duke University
Charles R. Hauser
Charles R. Hauser St. Edward's University
Elizabeth A. Dinsdale
Elizabeth A. Dinsdale Flinders University
Sarah C. R. Elgin
Sarah C. R. Elgin Washington University in St. Louis
Roy J. Britten
Roy J. Britten California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Genetics? There are several related degree options and career paths in the healthcare field that offer flexibility and a range of opportunities. Many students explore roles in health administration, nursing, or medical coding, either as a direct career goal or as complementing skills to genetics.

For those looking to enter healthcare administration quickly, consider enrolling in an accelerated healthcare administration degree online. This pathway can fast-track your journey into health management roles. If affordability is a concern, a health administration degree from an affordable online program can help you access quality education at a lower cost.

Those drawn to direct patient care may benefit from high acceptance rate nursing programs, which provide a supportive entry-point into the nursing profession. Alternatively, earning a medical billing certification enables you to work in the growing medical coding and billing field, with flexible and remote job options.

Each of these degree and certification pathways can complement a background in Genetics or serve as valuable alternatives in the diverse landscape of healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Pearson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles