World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 56 2230 2005 1103 977 118 8305

John Samuelson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Samuelson between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Samuelson published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2010. 7 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2010. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1978 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Samuelson: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 1
1982 3
1983 0
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 5
1991 1
1992 6
1993 6
1994 7
1995 6
1996 5
1997 7
1998 3
1999 3
2000 7
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 0
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 5
2009 4
2010 9
2011 3
2012 4
2013 2
2014 0
2015 4
2016 2
2017 4
2018 1
2019 6
2020 0
2021 2
2022 3
2023 0
2024 4
2025 3
Total 153
Download as CSV

John Samuelson publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Samuelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 118 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 118
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

John Samuelson D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Samuelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113 56
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

John Samuelson is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the broad fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology as well as Immunology and Microbiology. Their scientific contributions span multiple subfields, notably Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Parasitology, Organic Chemistry, and Immunology.

Their work encompasses several key research topics, including Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research, Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies, Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis, Legionella and Acanthamoeba research, Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms, Connexins and lens biology, and Galectins and Cancer Biology. This diversity reflects a focus on cellular and molecular processes pertinent to both infectious agents and biochemical pathways.

Samuelson's recent publications illustrate this scope. Examples include:

  • The nucleocytosolic O-fucosyltransferase SPINDLY affects protein expression and virulence in Toxoplasma gondii, 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Cellulose binding and the timing of expression influence protein targeting to the double-layered cyst wall of Acanthamoeba, 2024, mSphere
  • Spindly is a nucleocytosolic O-fucosyltransferase in Dictyostelium and related proteins are widespread in protists and bacteria, 2022, Glycobiology
  • Regulation of Pkc1 Hyper-Phosphorylation by Genotoxic Stress, 2021, Journal of Fungi
  • Novel antibodies detect nucleocytoplasmic O-fucose in protist pathogens, cellular slime molds, and plants, 2025, mSphere

Frequent publication venues for Samuelson include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), mSphere, Glycobiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, and Journal of Fungi. These venues indicate participation in disseminating research across both open-access preprints and peer-reviewed journals specializing in biochemistry, microbiology, and fungal biology.

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, including:

  • Christopher M. West
  • Manish Goyal
  • Bharath K. Sundararaj
  • Elisabet Gas-Pascual
  • Giulia Bandini

These collaborations suggest sustained research partnerships likely contributing to progress in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica

    Brendan Loftus;Iain Anderson;Rob Davies;U. Cecilia M. Alsmark

  • Genomic minimalism in the early diverging intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia.

    Hilary G. Morrison;Andrew G. McArthur;Frances D. Gillin;Stephen B. Aley

  • The diversity of dolichol-linked precursors to Asn-linked glycans likely results from secondary loss of sets of glycosyltransferases

    John Samuelson;Sulagna Banerjee;Paula Magnelli;Jike Cui

  • Hsp60 Is Targeted to a Cryptic Mitochondrion-Derived Organelle ("Crypton") in the Microaerophilic Protozoan Parasite Entamoeba Histolytica

    Zhiming Mai;Sudip Ghosh;Marta Frisardi;Ben Rosenthal

  • Structure and content of the Entamoeba histolytica genome.

    Clark Cg;Alsmark Uc;Tazreiter M;Saito-Nakano Y

  • A spliceosomal intron in Giardia lamblia.

    Julie E. J. Nixon;Amy Wang;Hilary G. Morrison;Andrew G. McArthur

  • Application of the polymerase chain reaction to the epidemiology of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica.

    R Acuna-Soto;J Samuelson;P De Girolami;L Zarate

  • The evolution of N-glycan-dependent endoplasmic reticulum quality control factors for glycoprotein folding and degradation

    Sulagna Banerjee;Prashanth Vishwanath;Jike Cui;Daniel J. Kelleher

  • A mouse model of Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis infection produced by coinjection with sand fly saliva.

    John Samuelson;Ethan Lerner;Robert Tesh;Richard Titus

  • Immune evasion by Schistosoma mansoni: loss of susceptibility to antibody or complement-dependent eosinophil attack by schistosomula cultured in medium free of macromolecules.

    A. Dessein;J. C. Samuelson;A. E. Butterworth;Maureen Hogan

  • Chitinase secretion by encysting Entamoeba invadens and transfected Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites: localization of secretory vesicles, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus.

    Sudip K. Ghosh;Jessica Field;Marta Frisardi;Benjamin Rosenthal

  • Evidence for Lateral Transfer of Genes Encoding Ferredoxins, Nitroreductases, NADH Oxidase, and Alcohol Dehydrogenase 3 from Anaerobic Prokaryotes to Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba histolytica

    Julie E. J. Nixon;Amy Wang;Jessica Field;Hilary G. Morrison

  • Evidence for the bacterial origin of genes encoding fermentation enzymes of the amitochondriate protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica.

    B Rosenthal;Z Mai;D Caplivski;S Ghosh

  • Molecular epidemiology of Entamoeba spp.: evidence of a bottleneck (Demographic sweep) and transcontinental spread of diploid parasites.

    Sudip Ghosh;Marta Frisardi;Lynn Ramirez-Avila;Steven Descoteaux

  • Newly transformed schistosomula spontaneously lose surface antigens and C3 acceptor sites during culture.

    J C Samuelson;A Sher;J P Caulfield

  • The most abundant glycoprotein of amebic cyst walls (Jacob) is a lectin with five Cys-rich, chitin-binding domains.

    M Frisardi;S K Ghosh;J Field;K Van Dellen

  • Early lateral transfer of genes encoding malic enzyme, acetyl-CoA synthetase and alcohol dehydrogenases from anaerobic prokaryotes to Entamoeba histolytica.

    Jessica Field;Benjamin Rosenthal;John Samuelson

  • Suggestive evidence for Darwinian selection against asparagine-linked glycans of Plasmodium falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii

    G. Guy Bushkin;Daniel M. Ratner;Jike Cui;Sulagna Banerjee

  • The cercarial glycocalyx of Schistosoma mansoni.

    J C Samuelson;J P Caulfield

  • Emetine-resistant mutants of Entamoeba histolytica overexpress mRNAs for multidrug resistance

    John Samuelson;Patricia Ayala;Esther Orozco;Dyann Wirth

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillips W. Robbins
Phillips W. Robbins Boston University
Catherine E. Costello
Catherine E. Costello Boston University
Brendan J. Loftus
Brendan J. Loftus University College Dublin
Rick A. Rogers
Rick A. Rogers Harvard University
Dyann F. Wirth
Dyann F. Wirth Harvard University
Reid Gilmore
Reid Gilmore University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Andrew G. McArthur
Andrew G. McArthur McMaster University
Mitchell L. Sogin
Mitchell L. Sogin Marine Biological Laboratory
Neil Hall
Neil Hall Norwich Research Park
Temple F. Smith
Temple F. Smith Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Molecular Biology, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and diverse career options in the life sciences and healthcare fields. Many students consider healthcare pathways, such as earning a BSN or transitioning from nursing to advanced practice roles. For those looking for flexible, high-quality nursing programs, best value nursing education online WGU programs are a popular choice.

Advancing your career in nursing is also possible through specialized bridge programs. For example, RN to MSN bridge programs offer a direct path from registered nurse to nurse practitioner or educator roles, with flexible online options tailored to working professionals.

When exploring online study, students should consider reputable, non profit online schools for accredited science and health degrees. These institutions often provide high-quality programs and better student support.

Additionally, veterans and active service members benefit from programs offered by the best military friendly colleges, which deliver tailored support and resources for military learners pursuing careers in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John Samuelson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles