World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
27029
World Ranking
16525
National Ranking
8302

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
27009
World Ranking
3836
National Ranking
1898

Matthew M. LaVail publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. LaVail sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 240 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Matthew M. LaVail D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. LaVail sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew M. LaVail is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research broadly focuses on the fields of Medicine, with specific subfields including Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics related to retinal studies such as:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin

Matthew M. LaVail has contributed to research published in venues including:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology

Their recent papers include:

  • An RCS-Like Retinal Dystrophy Phenotype in Mer Knockout Mice, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Correction to: Retinal Degenerative Diseases, 2020, Advances in experimental medicine and biology

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts are:

  • John S. Duncan
  • Douglas Yasumura
  • Michael T. Matthes
  • Haidong Yang
  • Nikolaus Trautmann

Best Publications

  • IRE1 Signaling Affects Cell Fate During the Unfolded Protein Response

    Jonathan H. Lin;Han Li;Douglas Yasumura;Hannah R. Cohen

  • Mutation of the receptor tyrosine kinase gene Mertk in the retinal dystrophic RCS rat

    Patricia M. D’Cruz;Douglas Yasumura;Jessica Weir;Michael T. Matthes

  • Retrograde Axonal Transport in the Central Nervous System

    Jennifer H. Lavail;Matthew M. Lavail

  • Photoreceptor degeneration in inherited retinal dystrophy delayed by basic fibroblast growth factor

    Ella G. Faktorovich;Roy H. Steinberg;Douglas Yasumura;Michael T. Matthes

  • Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light.

    Matthew M. Lavail;Kazuhiko Unoki;Douglas Yasumura;Michael T. Matthes

  • Rod outer segment disk shedding in rat retina: relationship to cyclic lighting

    Matthew M. LaVail

  • Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy

    Louvenia D. Carter-Dawson;Matthew M. Lavail;Matthew M. Lavail

  • Protection of mouse photoreceptors by survival factors in retinal degenerations.

    Matthew M. LaVail;Douglas Yasumura;Michael T. Matthes;Cathy Lau-Villacorta

  • Inherited retinal dystrophy: primary defect in pigment epithelium determined with experimental rat chimeras

    Richard J. Mullen;Matthew M. LaVail

  • The retrograde intraaxonal transport of horseradish peroxidase in the chick visual system: a light and electron microscopic study.

    Jennifer H. LaVail;Matthew M. LaVail

  • Differential effect of the rd mutation on rods and cones in the mouse retina.

    L D Carter-Dawson;M M LaVail;R L Sidman

  • Retinal remodeling triggered by photoreceptor degenerations.

    Bryan W. Jones;Carl B. Watt;Jeanne M. Frederick;Wolfgang Baehr

  • Ribozyme rescue of photoreceptor cells in a transgenic rat model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

    Alfred S. Lewin;Kimberly A. Drenser;William W. Hauswirth;Shimpei Nishikawa

  • Efficient photoreceptor-targeted gene expression in vivo by recombinant adeno-associated virus

    J G Flannery;S Zolotukhin;M I Vaquero;M M LaVail

  • Rods and cones in the mouse retina. II. Autoradiographic analysis of cell generation using tritiated thymidine

    Louvenia D. Carter-Dawson;Matthew M. Lavail

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor and local injury protect photoreceptors from light damage in the rat.

    EG Faktorovich;RH Steinberg;D Yasumura;MT Matthes

  • Timing and Topography of Cell Genesis in the Rat Retina

    David H. Rapaport;Lily L. Wong;Eric D. Wood;Douglas Yasumura

  • Injury-Induced Upregulation of bFGF and CNTF mRNAS in the Rat Retina

    R. Wen;Y. Song;T. Cheng;M. T. Matthes

  • Influence of eye pigmentation and light deprivation on inherited retinal dystrophy in the rat

    Matthew M. LaVail;Matthew M. LaVail;Barbara-Anne Battelle;Barbara-Anne Battelle

  • Efficient photoreceptor-targeted gene expression in vivo by recombinant adeno-associated virus (gene therapyyretinayretinitis pigmentosa)

    John G. Flannery;Sergei Zolotukhin;M. Lavail;Nicholas Muzyczka

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas Vollrath
Douglas Vollrath Stanford University
William W. Hauswirth
William W. Hauswirth University of Florida
Alfred S. Lewin
Alfred S. Lewin University of Florida
Robert E. Anderson
Robert E. Anderson University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
John G. Flannery
John G. Flannery University of California, Berkeley
Joe G. Hollyfield
Joe G. Hollyfield Baylor College of Medicine
Dean Bok
Dean Bok University of California, Los Angeles
David R. Copenhagen
David R. Copenhagen University of California, San Francisco
Glen T. Prusky
Glen T. Prusky Cornell University
Louis F. Reichardt
Louis F. Reichardt University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often opens doors to various healthcare and science-based careers. Today, many students take advantage of flexible learning by pursuing online degrees that complement their academic background and career aspirations.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, a phd in healthcare administration online can lead to high-level management roles in hospitals, research labs, and public health agencies. If your passion lies in pharmaceuticals, obtaining a degree from a best online pharmacy school could provide access to rewarding careers in drug research and pharmacy management.

Students fascinated by the science of human movement may consider an online exercise physiology degree, which prepares graduates for jobs in sports science, rehabilitation, and wellness coaching. Alternatively, you may find an accelerated kinesiology degree online an ideal path to quickly enter fields such as physical therapy, fitness training, or occupational health.

Pairing your Biology or Biochemistry background with the right online degree can expand your expertise and broaden your career opportunities within the dynamic landscape of health and science.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew M. LaVail

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles