World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
24358
World Ranking
13309
National Ranking
6771

Raymond D. Lund publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond D. Lund sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 315 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Raymond D. Lund D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond D. Lund sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond D. Lund is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their work contributes to academic research within the context of this institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are listed for this scientist. There are also no records of main fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, book publications, or awards won available in the provided data.

This profile summarizes the available factual information concerning Raymond D. Lund based solely on institution affiliation without additional details on research topics or publication history.

Best Publications

  • The origin of efferent pathways from the primary visual cortex, area 17, of the macaque monkey as shown by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase

    Jennifer S. Lund;Raymond D. Lund;Anita E. Hendrickson;Ann H. Bunt

  • Uncrossed Visual Pathways of Hooded and Albino Rats.

    R. D. Lund

  • Development of the geniculocortical pathway in rat

    R. D. Lund;M. J. Mustari

  • Development of the Rat's Uncrossed Retinotectal Pathway and Its Relation to Plasticity Studies

    PW Land;RD Lund

  • Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cells Rescue Visual Function in Dystrophic RCS Rats

    Raymond D. Lund;Shaomei Wang;Irina Klimanskaya;Toby Holmes

  • Synaptic patterns of the superficial layers of the superior colliculus of the rat

    Raymond D. Lund

  • Modified optic projections after unilateral eye removal in young rats.

    R.D. Lund;T.J. Cunningham;J.S. Lund

  • Thalamic afferents from the spinal cord and trigeminal nuclei. An experimental anatomical study in the rat.

    R. D. Lund;K. E. Webster

  • Transplanted neural tissue develops connections with host rat brain.

    Raymond D. Lund;Stephen D. Hauschka

  • Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex.

    Sergej V. Girman;Yves Sauvé;Raymond D. Lund

  • Cells Isolated from Umbilical Cord Tissue Rescue Photoreceptors and Visual Functions in a Rodent Model of Retinal Disease

    Raymond D. Lund;Shaomei Wang;Shaomei Wang;Bin Lu;Bin Lu;Sergej Girman;Sergej Girman

  • Synaptic Adjustment after Deafferentation of the Superior Colliculus of the Rat

    R. D. Lund;J. S. Lund

  • Development and plasticity of the brain

    Raymond D. Lund

  • Prenatal development of the optic projection in albino and hooded rats.

    Stuart M. Bunt;R.D. Lund;P.W. Land

  • The upper layers of the superior colliculus of the rat: A Golgi study

    T. P. Langer;R. D. Lund

  • Prenatal development of central optic pathways in albino rats.

    R. D. Lund;Ann H. Bunt

  • Sprouting of serotoninergic afferents into striatum after dopamine-depleting lesions in infant rats: a retrograde transport and immunocytochemical study.

    Abigail M. Snyder;Michael J. Zigmond;Raymond D. Lund

  • Development of neurons in the visual cortex (area 17) of the monkey (Macaca nemestrina): A Golgi study from fetal day 127 to postnatal maturity

    J. S. Lund;R. G. Boothe;R. D. Lund

  • Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats

    Raymond D. Lund;Peter Adamson;Yves Sauvé;David J. Keegan

  • Monkey retinal ganglion cells: morphometric analysis and tracing of axonal projections, with a consideration of the peroxidase technique.

    Ann H. Bunt;Anita E. Hendrickson;Jennifer S. Lund;Raymond D. Lund

Frequent Co-Authors

John Greenwood
John Greenwood University College London
Nicolás Cuenca
Nicolás Cuenca University of Alicante
Manuel Vidal-Sanz
Manuel Vidal-Sanz University of Murcia
Steven C. McLoon
Steven C. McLoon University of Minnesota
Sarah A. Dunlop
Sarah A. Dunlop University of Western Australia
Michael J. Young
Michael J. Young Harvard University
Thomas J. Gill
Thomas J. Gill New England Baptist Hospital
Lyn Beazley
Lyn Beazley University of Western Australia
Glen T. Prusky
Glen T. Prusky Cornell University
Ian F. Pollack
Ian F. Pollack University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Medicine in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and healthcare careers. If you’re interested in administrative roles, there are medical billing and coding online schools that allow you to work behind the scenes in vital hospital and clinic operations. These programs often offer flexible schedules and financial aid to help you get started.

For those aiming at a clinical path, nursing is a popular option with online and hybrid programs available. Wondering about entrance exams? You can explore if do all nursing schools require the teas before applying.

Ambitious students looking to move up quickly might consider a healthcare administration accelerated degree to fast-track their leadership opportunities. Nurses holding an ADN (Associate Degree in Nursing) can also further their education with adn to fnp bridge programs that provide a pathway to advanced practice roles such as Family Nurse Practitioner.

Each pathway presents unique opportunities for advancement in the US healthcare sector—whether you prefer direct patient care or behind-the-scenes leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond D. Lund

Recently Published Articles