World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7719 227 187 5612

Lyn Beazley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lyn Beazley between 1970 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lyn Beazley published across 41 years, from 1970 to 2010, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2003. 5 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2003. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication
1970 2010

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lyn Beazley: publications per year, 1970 to 2010
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 3
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 4
1988 4
1989 6
1990 1
1991 0
1992 4
1993 12
1994 5
1995 6
1996 15
1997 11
1998 15
1999 5
2000 7
2001 10
2002 7
2003 21
2004 9
2005 8
2006 11
2007 9
2008 5
2009 4
2010 1
Total 203
Download as CSV

Lyn Beazley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Beazley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 187 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 187
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Lyn Beazley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Beazley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science

Overview

Lyn Beazley is a researcher affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia. Their academic work spans multiple areas within medicine, with a notable focus on oncology, cancer research, and molecular biology. They have contributed to research in neurological sciences, particularly in cellular and molecular neuroscience, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to both cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

More specifically, their research touches on several subfields:

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology

They have investigated a range of topics across their published works, which include:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Wound Healing and Treatments

Several research papers exemplify the scope of Beazley's work, including:

  • Detection and prognostic role of heterogeneous populations of melanoma circulating tumour cells (2020, British Journal of Cancer)
  • Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcome from First-, but not Second-line Treatment and Identifies Melanoma Patients Who May Benefit from Combination Immunotherapy (2020, Clinical Cancer Research)
  • Detection of clinical progression through plasma ctDNA in metastatic melanoma patients: a comparison to radiological progression (2021, British Journal of Cancer)
  • Stopping targeted therapy for complete responders in advanced BRAF mutant melanoma (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • The effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on neuroimaging, biological, cognitive and motor outcomes in individuals with premanifest Huntington's disease (2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences)

Beazley frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Cancers
  • British Journal of Cancer
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Collaborations are an important aspect of Beazley's body of work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Elin S. Gray
  • Leslie Calapre
  • Tarek Meniawy
  • Michael Millward
  • Danielle Bartlett

Among professional recognitions, Beazley was named a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Effect of corticosteroids on brain growth in fetal sheep.

    W.L. Huang;Lyn Beazley;J.A. Quinlivan;S.F. Evans

  • Repeated prenatal corticosteroids delay myelination in the ovine central nervous system

    Sarah A. Dunlop;Michael A. Archer;Julie A. Quinlivan;Julie A. Quinlivan;Lyn D. Beazley

  • Redefining the Role of Metallothionein within the Injured Brain: EXTRACELLULAR METALLOTHIONEINS PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE ASTROCYTE-NEURON RESPONSE TO INJURY*

    Roger S. Chung;Milena Penkowa;Justin Dittmann;Carolyn E. King

  • The influence of ontogeny and light environment on the expression of visual pigment opsins in the retina of the black bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri.

    Julia Shand;Wayne L. Davies;Nicole Thomas;Lois Balmer

  • Erythropoietin is both neuroprotective and neuroregenerative following optic nerve transection

    Carolyn E. King;Jennifer Rodger;Carole Bartlett;Tammy Esmaili

  • An investigation into the role of ganglion cells in the regulation of division and death of other retinal cells.

    Unknown

  • Visual pigments of the platypus: a novel route to mammalian colour vision.

    Wayne L. Davies;Livia S. Carvalho;Jill A. Cowing;Lyn D. Beazley

  • Metallothionein-IIA promotes neurite growth via the megalin receptor

    Melinda Fitzgerald;Pia Nairn;Carole A. Bartlett;Roger S. Chung

  • The evolution of an area centralis and visual streak in the marsupial Setonix brachyurus.

    L. D. Beazley;S. A. Dunlop

  • Retinal characteristics of the ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus.

    Helen R. Barbour;Michael A. Archer;Nathan S. Hart;Nicole Thomas

  • Contrast sensitivity in children and adults.

    Unknown

  • Generation of retinal cells in the wallaby, Setonix brachyurus (quokka)

    Unknown

  • Retinal ganglion cell death during optic nerve regeneration in the frog hyla moorei

    Unknown

  • Retinal Structure and Visual Acuity in a Polyprotodont Marsupial, the Fat-Tailed Dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata)

    Catherine Arrese;Sarah Dunlop;A.M. Harman;C.R. Braekevelt

  • Generation of transgenic mice with mild and severe retinal neovascularisation.

    Chooi-May Lai;Sarah Dunlop;L.A. May;M. Gorbatov

  • Changing retinal ganglion cell distribution in the frog Heleioporus eyrei.

    S. A. Dunlop;L. D. Beazley

  • Cone topography and spectral sensitivity in two potentially trichromatic marsupials, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) and quenda (Isoodon obesulus)

    Catherine A Arrese;Alison Y Oddy;Philip B Runham;Nathan S Hart

  • Early vascular and neuronal changes in a VEGF transgenic mouse model of retinal neovascularization.

    Pauline E. van Eeden;Lisa B. G. Tee;Sherralee Lukehurst;Chooi-May Lai

  • Optic nerve regenerates but does not restore topographic projections in the lizard Ctenophorus ornatus

    L.D. Beazley;P.W. Sheard;Marc Tennant;D. Starac

  • Anatomical comparison of the macaque and marsupial visual cortex: Common features that may reflect retention of essential cortical elements

    C.J. Tyler;S.A. Dunlop;R.D. Lund;A.M. Harman

  • A morphometric study of the retinal ganglion cell layer and optic nerve from metamorphosis in Xenopus laevis

    S.A. Dunlop;L.D. Beazley

  • Numbers of axons in the optic nerve and of retinal ganglion cells during development in the marsupial Setonix brachyurus

    C.R. Braekevelt;L.D. Beazley;S.A. Dunlop;J.E. Darby

  • Expression of ephrin-A2 in the superior colliculus and EphA5 in the retina following optic nerve section in adult rat.

    Jennifer Rodger;K.A. Lindsey;Simone Leaver;C.E. King

  • Lateralized predatory responses in the ornate dragon lizard (Ctenophorus ornatus).

    Andrew Robins;Patty Chen;Lyn D. Beazley;Sarah A. Dunlop

  • Visual System in a Diurnal Marsupial, the Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus): Retinal Organization, Visual Acuity and Visual Fields

    C. Arrese;Michael Archer;P. Runham;Sarah Dunlop

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah A. Dunlop
Sarah A. Dunlop University of Western Australia
Jennifer Rodger
Jennifer Rodger University of Western Australia
Patricia A. Fleming
Patricia A. Fleming Murdoch University
Raymond D. Lund
Raymond D. Lund University of Utah
David Hunt
David Hunt University of Edinburgh
John P. Newnham
John P. Newnham University of Western Australia
Alan R. Harvey
Alan R. Harvey University of Western Australia
Michael Archer
Michael Archer University of New South Wales
Adrian K. West
Adrian K. West University of Tasmania
Roger S. Chung
Roger S. Chung Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are several related fields and degrees to consider when planning your career path. Many students combine neuroscience studies with broader psychological or social science programs, increasing their options across healthcare, therapy, and research careers.

For those looking to support families and relationships, pursuing a family therapy degree online can be an accessible and affordable step. These programs focus on clinical skills to help you become a licensed therapist.

Those who prefer a broader psychology background might explore a masters in psychology online cheap, which is ideal for students seeking advanced, flexible study options without a high financial burden. Similarly, an online degree psychology program is a great choice for undergraduates starting out, often offering various specializations.

If your interest extends to social work, you might research how long does it take to get a msw online. MSW programs equip you for diverse roles in social services and mental health, and many offer accelerated options for quicker completion.

Best Scientists Citing Lyn Beazley

Recently Published Articles