World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Phillips W. Robbins

Phillips W. Robbins

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
91
Citations
22359
World Ranking
2371
National Ranking
1263

Phillips W. Robbins publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillips W. Robbins sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 215 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Phillips W. Robbins D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillips W. Robbins sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillips W. Robbins is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on research conducted within this institution.

While specific details regarding their recent papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not available, the association with Boston University suggests involvement in scholarly activities typical of this academic environment.

No records of publications in books, subfields of study, or main topics of work have been provided.

There is also no information on awards or honors that Phillips W. Robbins may have received, nor indications of deceased status.

Overall, Phillips W. Robbins is identified through their primary affiliation, with other aspects of their academic profile not detailed in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Chitinase is required for cell separation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    M.J. Kuranda;P.W. Robbins

  • Proposal for a common oligosaccharide intermediate in the synthesis of membrane glycoproteins.

    Phillips W. Robbins;S.Catherine Hubbard;S.J. Turco;Dyann F. Wirth

  • Carbohydrate ligands of the LEC cell adhesion molecules

    Brian K. Brandley;Stuart J. Swiedler;Phillips W. Robbins

  • Large scale identification of genes involved in cell surface biosynthesis and architecture in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Marc Lussier;Ann-Marie White;Jane Sheraton;Tiziano di Paolo

  • Transporters of Nucleotide Sugars, ATP, and Nucleotide Sulfate in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Golgi Apparatus

    Carlos B. Hirschberg;Phillips W. Robbins;Claudia Abeijon

  • alpha-D-Mannosidases of rat liver Golgi membranes. Mannosidase II is the GlcNAcMAN5-cleaving enzyme in glycoprotein biosynthesis and mannosidases Ia and IB are the enzymes converting Man9 precursors to Man5 intermediates.

    D R Tulsiani;S C Hubbard;P W Robbins;O Touster

  • Architecture of the yeast cell wall. The linkage between chitin and beta(1-->3)-glucan.

    Roman Kollár;Eva Petráková;Gilbert Ashwell;Phillips W. Robbins

  • The S. cerevisiae structural gene for chitin synthase is not required for chitin synthesis in vivo.

    Christine E. Bulawa;Martin Slater;Enrico Cabib;Janice Au-Young

  • Classification of fungal chitin synthases.

    A R Bowen;J L Chen-Wu;M Momany;R Young

  • Yeast mutants deficient in protein glycosylation

    Tim C. Huffaker;Phillips W. Robbins

  • Regulation of asparagine-linked oligosaccharide processing. Oligosaccharide processing in Aedes albopictus mosquito cells.

    P Hsieh;P W Robbins

  • Cloning and expression of a Streptomyces plicatus chitinase (chitinase-63) in Escherichia coli.

    P W Robbins;C Albright;B Benfield

  • Glycoprotein biosynthesis. Rat liver microsomal glucosidases which process oligosaccharides.

    L.S. Grinna;P.W. Robbins

  • Cloning and sequencing of the yeast gene for dolichol phosphate mannose synthase, an essential protein.

    P Orlean;C Albright;P W Robbins

  • Characterization of a polyisoprenoid compound functional in O-antigen biosynthesis.

    A Wright;M Dankert;P Fennessey;P W Robbins

  • Cloning and Sequencing of a Candida albicans Catalase Gene and Effects of Disruption of This Gene

    Deborah R. Wysong;Laurent Christin;Alan M. Sugar;Phillips W. Robbins

  • The diversity of dolichol-linked precursors to Asn-linked glycans likely results from secondary loss of sets of glycosyltransferases

    John Samuelson;Sulagna Banerjee;Paula Magnelli;Jike Cui

  • Isolation and identification of active sulfate.

    Phillips W. Robbins;Fritz Lipmann

  • Lipid rafts-protein association and the regulation of protein activity.

    Héctor A Lucero;Phillips W Robbins

  • Direction of chain growth in polysaccharide synthesis.

    P. W. Robbins;D. Bray;M. Dankert;A. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

John Samuelson
John Samuelson Boston University
Catherine E. Costello
Catherine E. Costello Boston University
Marsha Rich Rosner
Marsha Rich Rosner University of Chicago
Carlos B. Hirschberg
Carlos B. Hirschberg Boston University
Dyann F. Wirth
Dyann F. Wirth Harvard University
Charles A. Specht
Charles A. Specht University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Reid Gilmore
Reid Gilmore University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Enrico Cabib
Enrico Cabib National Institutes of Health
Barry R. O'Keefe
Barry R. O'Keefe National Institutes of Health
Christian R. H. Raetz
Christian R. H. Raetz Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often opens doors to a wide range of healthcare and science-based careers—many of which also value business and administrative expertise. If you are considering leadership roles in healthcare, understanding healthcare mba cost can help you plan for an affordable pathway to upper-level management positions in hospitals or biotech firms.

Another popular career option is medical coding and billing, which offers flexibility and job stability. Students interested in these tracks should compare cpc certification with other credentials to understand the required investment and earning potential. The medical coding salary can vary based on certification, experience level, and location.

As part of your career planning, it’s also wise to review the medical coding job outlook to evaluate long-term opportunities and weigh the advantages and challenges of the field. These related pathways offer rewarding prospects for students passionate about science, healthcare, and data-driven work environments.

Best Scientists Citing Phillips W. Robbins

Recently Published Articles