World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter F. Stadler

Peter F. Stadler

Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025
Award Badge
Genetics
Germany
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 102 330 319 17 17 654 64032
Genetics 119 384 370 25 24 788 85085

Peter F. Stadler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter F. Stadler between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter F. Stadler published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 20.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 72 publications in 2021. 98 of the 1,120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 72. Peak 72 publications in 2021. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 37 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 41 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 44 publications 2014: 56 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 45 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 49 publications 2021: 72 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 54 publications
1972 2025

1,120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter F. Stadler: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 5
1992 5
1993 12
1994 12
1995 7
1996 20
1997 16
1998 12
1999 20
2000 15
2001 13
2002 18
2003 23
2004 37
2005 31
2006 38
2007 37
2008 37
2009 41
2010 37
2011 37
2012 28
2013 44
2014 56
2015 45
2016 36
2017 41
2018 45
2019 39
2020 49
2021 72
2022 45
2023 45
2024 44
2025 54
Total 1,120
Download as CSV

Peter F. Stadler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Stadler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 652–661 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 654 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20 654
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter F. Stadler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Stadler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27 102
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Peter F. Stadler is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany and has produced extensive research primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work encompasses a broad range of subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Ecology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist has contributed to several research topics, notably:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Peter F. Stadler's recent papers include:

  • "A guide to naming human non-coding RNA genes," 2020, The EMBO Journal
  • "Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision," 2023, Nature Methods
  • "Human pathways in animal models: possibilities and limitations," 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "DNA methylation signature in blood mirrors successful weight-loss during lifestyle interventions: the CENTRAL trial," 2020, Genome Medicine
  • "HumanMetagenomeDB: a public repository of curated and standardized metadata for human metagenomes," 2020, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marc Hellmuth
  • Jörg Fallmann
  • David Schaller
  • Ulisses Nunes da Rocha
  • Stephan Wolf

The most common publication venues for Peter F. Stadler are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Algorithms for Molecular Biology
  • Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • The Art of Discrete and Applied Mathematics

The scientist has also contributed to academic books, including a publication titled "Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology" (2021) through Springer Science+Business Media.

Best Publications

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • ViennaRNA Package 2.0

    Ronny Lorenz;Stephan H. F. Bernhart;Christian Höner zu Siederdissen;Hakim Tafer

  • MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation

    Matthias Bernt;Alexander Donath;Frank Jühling;Frank Jühling;Fabian Externbrink

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • RNA Maps Reveal New RNA Classes and a Possible Function for Pervasive Transcription

    Philipp Kapranov;Jill Cheng;Sujit Dike;David A. Nix

  • Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures

    I. L. Hofacker;W. Fontana;P. F. Stadler;P. F. Stadler;L. S. Bonhoeffer

  • Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution

    Martien A. M. Groenen;Alan L. Archibald;Hirohide Uenishi;Christopher K. Tuggle

  • The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers

    Susanne N. Gröbner;Barbara C. Worst;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Ivo Buchhalter

  • The primary transcriptome of the major human pathogen Helicobacter pylori

    Cynthia M. Sharma;Steve Hoffmann;Fabien Darfeuille;Fabien Darfeuille;Jérémy Reignier;Jérémy Reignier

  • Proteinortho : Detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis

    Marcus Lechner;Sven Findeiß;Lydia Steiner;Manja Marz

  • From Sequences to Shapes and Back: A Case Study in RNA Secondary Structures

    Peter Schuster;Walter Fontana;Peter F. Stadler;Ivo L. Hofacker

  • tRNAdb 2009: compilation of tRNA sequences and tRNA genes

    Frank Jühling;Mario Mörl;Roland K. Hartmann;Mathias Sprinzl

  • Fast and reliable prediction of noncoding RNAs

    Stefan Washietl;Ivo L. Hofacker;Peter F. Stadler

  • Interleukin-6–dependent survival of multiple myeloma cells involves the Stat3-mediated induction of microRNA-21 through a highly conserved enhancer

    Dennis Löffler;Katja Brocke-Heidrich;Gabriele Pfeifer;Claudia Stocsits

  • Secondary structure prediction for aligned RNA sequences.

    Ivo L. Hofacker;Martin Fekete;Peter F. Stadler;Peter F. Stadler

  • Molecular Evolution of a MicroRNA Cluster

    Andrea Tanzer;Andrea Tanzer;Peter F Stadler;Peter F Stadler

  • The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution

    Chris T. Amemiya;Chris T. Amemiya;Jessica Alfoldi;Alison P. Lee;Shaohua Fan

  • The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris )

    Juliane C. Dohm;André E. Minoche;Daniela Holtgräwe;Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez

  • Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation

    Martijn A. Huynen;Peter F. Stadler;Walter Fontana

  • RNA Secondary Structures

    Ivo L. Hofacker;Peter F. Stadler

  • Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes

    Alexander Donath;Frank Jühling;Frank Jühling;Marwa Al-Arab;Marwa Al-Arab;Stephan H Bernhart

  • tRNAdb 2009: compilation of tRNA sequences and tRNA genes

    Frank Jühling;Mario Mörl;Roland K Hartmann;Peter Stadler

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivo L. Hofacker
Ivo L. Hofacker University of Vienna
Rolf Backofen
Rolf Backofen University of Freiburg
Jan Gorodkin
Jan Gorodkin University of Copenhagen
Günter P. Wagner
Günter P. Wagner Yale University
Chris T. Amemiya
Chris T. Amemiya University of California, Merced
Martin Middendorf
Martin Middendorf Leipzig University
Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm
Roland Eils
Roland Eils Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Bernd Schierwater
Bernd Schierwater University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Gerik Scheuermann
Gerik Scheuermann Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your studies beyond Computer Science, there are many flexible options to consider. Online degrees are a popular choice for students who need to balance education with work or personal commitments.

For a fast track into the workforce, explore the best associate degrees available online. These programs can typically be completed in as little as six months, offering practical skills and a quick start to your career.

Many students choose interdisciplinary pathways, such as combining technology skills with an online degree in business. This opens doors to management, entrepreneurship, and technology leadership.

Cost and accessibility are top concerns for most learners. You’ll find a wide range of cheapest online college bachelor degree options, allowing you to gain a quality education without the high tuition of traditional universities.

Those specifically interested in technical or engineering fields should also review the cheapest engineering degree programs offered online. These provide affordable, accredited pathways to in-demand STEM careers.

Best Scientists Citing Peter F. Stadler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles