World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mario Vaneechoutte

Mario Vaneechoutte

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 88 771 684 19 17 349 24493

Mario Vaneechoutte publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mario Vaneechoutte between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mario Vaneechoutte published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2009. 12 of the 378 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2009. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

378 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mario Vaneechoutte: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 7
1996 7
1997 8
1998 9
1999 7
2000 12
2001 13
2002 10
2003 9
2004 12
2005 13
2006 10
2007 15
2008 8
2009 35
2010 22
2011 14
2012 19
2013 17
2014 10
2015 13
2016 13
2017 19
2018 10
2019 16
2020 9
2021 10
2022 4
2023 2
2024 9
2025 3
Total 378
Download as CSV

Mario Vaneechoutte publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Vaneechoutte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 345–354 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 349 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64 349
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Mario Vaneechoutte D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Vaneechoutte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32 88
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Mario Vaneechoutte is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has a significant body of research spanning medicine, immunology and microbiology, as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work encompasses multiple specialized subfields including epidemiology, microbiology, molecular biology, ecology, and physiology.

The scientist's research covers a range of main topics as demonstrated by their publications, including:

  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Frequent coauthors associated with their work are:

  • Piet Cools
  • Leen Van Simaey
  • Tessa Gryp
  • Abel Abera Negash
  • Marie Joossens

Their research has been published regularly in notable venues, with multiple articles appearing in:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Viruses
  • Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
  • Nature anthropology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Some recent papers include:

  • "Gut microbiota generation of protein-bound uremic toxins and related metabolites is not altered at different stages of chronic kidney disease" (2020) in Kidney International
  • "A Case of Phage Therapy against Pandrug-Resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans in a 12-Year-Old Lung-Transplanted Cystic Fibrosis Patient" (2021) in Viruses
  • "Isolation and Quantification of Uremic Toxin Precursor-Generating Gut Bacteria in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients" (2020) in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Evaluation of the Stability of Bacteriophages in Different Solutions Suitable for the Production of Magistral Preparations in Belgium" (2021) in Viruses
  • "Engineered Phage Endolysin Eliminates Gardnerella Biofilm without Damaging Beneficial Bacteria in Bacterial Vaginosis Ex Vivo" (2021) in Pathogens

Their scientific contributions focus heavily on microbial interactions, diagnostics, and therapeutic innovations, particularly in relation to infections and chronic disease management.

Best Publications

  • Quality-Controlled Small-Scale Production of a Well-Defined Bacteriophage Cocktail for Use in Human Clinical Trials

    Maya Merabishvili;Jean-Paul Pirnay;Gilbert Verbeken;Nina Chanishvili

  • Staphylococcus pseudintermedius sp. nov., a coagulase-positive species from animals.

    Luc A. Devriese;Marc Vancanneyt;Margo Baele;Mario Vaneechoutte

  • Cloning of 16S rRNA genes amplified from normal and disturbed vaginal microflora suggests a strong association between Atopobium vaginae , Gardnerella vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis

    Rita Verhelst;Hans Verstraelen;Geert Claeys;Gerda Verschraegen

  • Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora

    Hans Verstraelen;Rita Verhelst;Geert Claeys;Ellen De Backer

  • p-Cresyl sulfate

    Tessa Gryp;Raymond Vanholder;Mario Vaneechoutte;Griet Glorieux

  • Distribution of Acinetobacter species on human skin: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods.

    H Seifert;L Dijkshoorn;P Gernersmidt;N Pelzer

  • Lactobacillus iners : friend or foe?

    Mariya I. Petrova;Gregor Reid;Mario Vaneechoutte;Sarah Lebeer;Sarah Lebeer

  • Identification of Acinetobacter genomic species by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis.

    M. Vaneechoutte;L. Dijkshoorn;I. Tjernberg;Abdeslam Elaichouni

  • Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System.

    Jonas D. Van Belleghem;Jonas D. Van Belleghem;Krystyna Dąbrowska;Mario Vaneechoutte;Jeremy J. Barr

  • Species-Level Identification of Isolates of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii Complex by Sequence Analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Spacer Region

    Hsien Chang Chang;Yu Fang Wei;Lenie Dijkshoorn;Mario Vaneechoutte

  • Rapid identification of bacteria of the Comamonadaceae with amplified ribosomal DNA-restriction analysis (ARDRA)

    Mario Vaneechoutte;Rudi Rossau;Paul De Vos;Monique Gillis

  • Active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis can be specifically diagnosed and monitored based on the biostructure of the fecal flora

    Alexander Swidsinski;Vera Loening-Baucke;Mario Vaneechoutte;Yvonne Doerffel

  • The Phage Therapy Paradigm: Prêt-à-Porter or Sur-mesure?

    Jean-Paul Pirnay;Daniel De Vos;Gilbert Verbeken;Maia Merabishvili

  • Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex with the proposal of Acinetobacter pittii sp. nov. (formerly Acinetobacter genomic species 3) and Acinetobacter nosocomialis sp. nov. (formerly Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU).

    Alexandr Nemec;Lenka Krizova;Martina Maixnerova;Tanny J.K. van der Reijden

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa population structure revisited

    Jean-Paul Pirnay;Florence Bilocq;Bruno Pot;Pierre Cornelis

  • Wautersia gen. nov., a novel genus accommodating the phylogenetic lineage including Ralstonia eutropha and related species, and proposal of Ralstonia [Pseudomonas] syzygii (Roberts et al. 1990) comb. nov.

    Mario Vaneechoutte;Peter Kämpfer;Thierry De Baere;Enevold Falsen

  • Some coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species affect udder health more than others.

    K. Supré;F. Haesebrouck;R.N. Zadoks;M. Vaneechoutte

  • Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners

    Ellen De Backer;Rita Verhelst;Hans Verstraelen;Mohammed A Alqumber

  • Quality and Safety Requirements for Sustainable Phage Therapy Products

    Jean-Paul Pirnay;Bob G. Blasdel;Laurent Bretaudeau;Angus Buckling

  • Multicenter study using standardized protocols and reagents for evaluation of reproducibility of PCR-based fingerprinting of Acinetobacter spp.

    Hj Grundmann;Kj Towner;L Dijkshoorn;P Gernersmidt

  • Cloning of 16S rRNA genes amplified from normal and disturbed vaginal microflora points to a strong assocation between Atopobium vaginae, Gardnerella vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis

    Rita Verhelst;Hans Verstraelen;Geert Claeys;Gerda Verschraegen

Frequent Co-Authors

Geert Claeys
Geert Claeys Ghent University Hospital
Gerda Verschraegen
Gerda Verschraegen Ghent University Hospital
Hans Verstraelen
Hans Verstraelen Ghent University
Lenie Dijkshoorn
Lenie Dijkshoorn Leiden University Medical Center
Freddy Haesebrouck
Freddy Haesebrouck Ghent University
Jean-Paul Pirnay
Jean-Paul Pirnay Queen Astrid Military Hospital
Luc Devriese
Luc Devriese Ghent University
Daniel De Vos
Daniel De Vos Queen Astrid Military Hospital
Tania Crucitti
Tania Crucitti Institut Pasteur de Madagascar
Filomeen Haerynck
Filomeen Haerynck Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology opens doors to various allied health and medical fields. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, online health information management programs cahiim accredited offer a valuable avenue. These programs provide essential skills in managing patient data and healthcare systems, enhancing career prospects.

If you're seeking quicker certification, the healthcare industry also offers flexible options like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs. These are ideal for individuals aiming to enter the health sector rapidly while gaining important technical expertise.

For microbiology graduates looking to expand clinical expertise and earning potential, discovering medical degrees online that pay well can align educational goals with financial rewards. Online medical education offers flexible pathways to high-demand roles in healthcare.

Additionally, pursuing public health credentials can complement a microbiology background. Identifying which online mph programs are easiest to get into helps students find accessible options to advance their knowledge in epidemiology, health policy, and community health.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Vaneechoutte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles