World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
11282
World Ranking
5676
National Ranking
334

David F. Cechetto publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Cechetto sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David F. Cechetto D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Cechetto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Cechetto is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, contributing to a variety of fields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, and Neurology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics in healthcare and biomedical research, such as:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Global Health and Surgery
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare

Key publications by David F. Cechetto include:

  • "White matter inflammation and cognitive function in a co-morbid metabolic syndrome and prodromal Alzheimer's disease rat model," published in 2020 in the Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • "Developing and implementing a novel mentorship model (4+ 1) for maternal, newborn and child health in Rwanda," published in 2020 in BMC Health Services Research
  • "I cannot say no when a pregnant woman needs my support to get to the health centre": involvement of community health workers in Rwanda's maternal health," published in 2020 in BMC Health Services Research
  • "Developing and implementing a model of equitable distribution of mentorship in districts with spatial inequities and maldistribution of human resources for maternal and newborn care in Rwanda," published in 2021 in BMC Health Services Research
  • "Microglial Inflammation and Cognitive Dysfunction in Comorbid Rat Models of Striatal Ischemic Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease: Effects of Antioxidant Catalase-SKL on Behavioral and Cellular Pathology," published in 2022 in Neuroscience

Frequent publication venues where the scientist's work appears include:

  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • Neuroscience
  • BMJ Open
  • International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship

Among regular collaborators, David F. Cechetto often coauthors with:

  • Anaclet Ngabonzima
  • Celestin Hategeka
  • Isaac Luginaah
  • Cynthia Kenyon
  • Panagiota Tryphonopoulos

Best Publications

  • Evidence for a viscerotopic sensory representation in the cortex and thalamus in the rat

    David F. Cechetto;Clifford B. Saper

  • Organization of visceral and limbic connections in the insular cortex of the rat.

    Gary V. Allen;Clifford B. Saper;Karen M. Hurley;David F. Cechetto

  • Autonomic responses and efferent pathways from the insular cortex in the rat.

    Y Yasui;C D Breder;C B Saper;C B Saper;D F Cechetto;D F Cechetto

  • Neurochemical organization of the hypothalamic projection to the spinal cord in the rat.

    David F. Cechetto;Clifford B. Saper

  • Spinal and trigeminal dorsal horn projections to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.

    David F. Cechetto;David G. Standaert;Clifford B. Saper

  • Cerebrogenic Cardiac Arrhythmias: Cerebral Electrocardiographic Influences and Their Role in Sudden Death

    Stephen M. Oppenheimer;David F. Cechetto;Vladimir C. Hachinski

  • Insular cortex stimulation produces lethal cardiac arrhythmias: a mechanism of sudden death?

    Stephen M. Oppenheimer;John X. Wilson;Collette Guiraudon;David F. Cechetto;David F. Cechetto

  • Cardiac chronotropic organization of the rat insular cortex

    Stephen M. Oppenheimer;David F. Cechetto;David F. Cechetto

  • Functional and anatomical organization of cardiovascular pressor and depressor sites in the lateral hypothalamic area: I. descending projections

    Gary V. Allen;David F. Cechetto;David F. Cechetto

  • Cerebral Hemispheric Lateralization in Cardiac Autonomic Control

    Byung-Woo Yoon;Carlos A. Morillo;David F. Cechetto;Vladimir Hachinski

  • Connexin43 null mutation increases infarct size after stroke

    Ramin Siushansian;John F. Bechberger;David F. Cechetto;Vladimir C. Hachinski

  • Human forebrain activation by visceral stimuli.

    Andrew B. King;Ravi S. Menon;Ravi S. Menon;Vladimir Hachinski;Vladimir Hachinski;David F. Cechetto

  • Subcortical sites mediating sympathetic responses from insular cortex in rats.

    D. F. Cechetto;Shu Jun Chen

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactive projections from the thalamus to the striatum and amygdala in the rat.

    Yukihiko Yasui;Clifford B. Saper;David F. Cechetto;David F. Cechetto

  • The Insular Cortex and the Regulation of Cardiac Function.

    Stephen Oppenheimer;David Cechetto

  • Asymmetry of sympathetic consequences of experimental stroke.

    Vladimir C. Hachinski;Stephen M. Oppenheimer;John X. Wilson;Colette Guiraudon

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the visceral sensory cortex, thalamus, and related pathways in the rat.

    Yukihiko Yasui;Clifford B. Saper;David F. Cechetto

  • Autonomic and myocardial changes in middle cerebral artery occlusion: stroke models in the rat.

    David F. Cechetto;John X. Wilson;Karen E. Smith;Darryl Wolski

  • Propofol Anesthesia Compared to Awake Reduces Infarct Size in Rats

    Adrian W. Gelb;Nestor A. Bayona;John X. Wilson;David F. Cechetto

  • Inhibition of the firing of vasopressin neurons by atriopeptin

    David G. Standaert;David F. Cechetto;Philip Needleman;Clifford B. Saper

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladimir Hachinski
Vladimir Hachinski University of Western Ontario
Isaac Luginaah
Isaac Luginaah University of Western Ontario
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Christian C. Naus
Christian C. Naus University of British Columbia
David G. Munoz
David G. Munoz University of Toronto
Robert J. McDonald
Robert J. McDonald University of Lethbridge
Clifford B. Saper
Clifford B. Saper Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Robert Bartha
Robert Bartha University of Western Ontario
Julie A. Schneider
Julie A. Schneider Rush University Medical Center
Lenore J. Launer
Lenore J. Launer National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Neuroscience or related fields in the USA, there are many flexible online degree options available to help jumpstart your education and career. Some students benefit from enrolling in the shortest online psyd programs, which can lead to advanced careers in psychology with a focus on research, therapy, or education.

Another popular pathway is through mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy), which allow you to apply neuroscience principles directly in therapeutic settings. Those looking for a fast track might consider accelerated online degrees, which shorten the time needed to graduate and start your professional journey.

When selecting your degree, it’s also smart to consider future salary potential. Reviewing the options for what bachelors degree should i get can help you align your studies with high-demand, lucrative career paths commonly linked to neuroscience, psychology, and related health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Cechetto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles