World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
16439
World Ranking
3236
National Ranking
189

Robert Bartha publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Bartha sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 359 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert Bartha D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Bartha sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Bartha is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research contributions primarily focus on medicine, with significant emphasis on neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry and mental health, physiology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Robert Bartha has published extensively in multiple scientific journals. Frequently appearing venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain
  • Brain Communications
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Notable recent papers authored by or associated with Robert Bartha are:

  • "Progression of Behavioral Disturbances and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Glutamate and Dysconnection in the Salience Network: Neurochemical, Effective Connectivity, and Computational Evidence in Schizophrenia," 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • "Network structure and transcriptomic vulnerability shape atrophy in frontotemporal dementia," 2022, Brain
  • "Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in mice triggers a slowly developing cascade of long-term and persistent behavioral deficits and pathological changes," 2021, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • "Differential early subcortical involvement in genetic FTD within the GENFI cohort," 2021, NeuroImage Clinical

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Sandra E. Black
  • Mario Masellis
  • Maria Carmela Tartaglia
  • Elizabeth Finger
  • Sean Symons

Best Publications

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Clinical Proton MR Spectroscopy in Central Nervous System Disorders

    Gülin Öz;Jeffry R. Alger;Peter B. Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • Ventricular enlargement as a possible measure of Alzheimer's disease progression validated using the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative database

    Sean M. Nestor;Raul Rupsingh;Michael Borrie;Matthew Smith

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Glutamate and glutamine measured with 4.0 T proton MRS in never-treated patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

    Jean Théberge;Robert Bartha;Dick J. Drost;Ravi S. Menon

  • Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations

    Martin Wilson;Ovidiu Andronesi;Peter B Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Association of Dual-Task Gait With Incident Dementia in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Gait and Brain Study.

    Manuel M. Montero-Odasso;Yanina Sarquis-Adamson;Mark Speechley;Michael J. Borrie

  • Resting state default-mode network connectivity in early depression using a seed region-of-interest analysis: Decreased connectivity with caudate nucleus

    Robyn Bluhm;Peter Williamson;Ruth Lanius;Jean Théberge

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • Measurement of glutamate and glutamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of never-treated schizophrenic patients and healthy controls by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    R. Bartha;P. C. Williamson;D. J. Drost;A. Malla

  • Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer's disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE

    Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

  • Reduced hippocampal glutamate in Alzheimer disease

    R. Rupsingh;M. Borrie;M. Borrie;M. Smith;J.L. Wells;J.L. Wells

  • Blood pressure levels and brain volume reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Olivier Beauchet;Sébastien Celle;Frédéric Roche;Robert Bartha

  • A short echo 1H spectroscopy and volumetric MRI study of the corpus striatum in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and comparison subjects

    Robert Bartha;Murray B. Stein;Peter C. Williamson;Dick J. Drost

  • Quantitative Tissue Ph Measurement during Cerebral Ischemia Using Amine and Amide Concentration-Independent Detection (AACID) with MRI

    Nevin McVicar;Alex X Li;Daniela F Gonçalves;Daniela F Gonçalves;Miranda Bellyou

  • Factors affecting the quantification of short echo in-vivo 1H MR spectra: prior knowledge, peak elimination, and filtering.

    R. Bartha;D. J. Drost;P. C. Williamson

  • Comparison of the quantification precision of human short echo time 1H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 tesla

    R. Bartha;D.J. Drost;R.S. Menon;P.C. Williamson

  • Functional MRI of pain application in youth who engaged in repetitive non-suicidal self-injury vs. psychiatric controls

    Elizabeth Osuch;Kristen Ford;Andrew Wrath;Robert Bartha

  • In vivo 1H2O T2+ measurement in the human occipital lobe at 4T and 7T by Carr-Purcell MRI: detection of microscopic susceptibility contrast.

    Robert Bartha;Shalom Michaeli;Hellmut Merkle;Gregor Adriany

Frequent Co-Authors

Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Olivier Beauchet
Olivier Beauchet McGill University
Stephen C. Strother
Stephen C. Strother University of Toronto
Richard H. Swartz
Richard H. Swartz Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Mario Masellis
Mario Masellis Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Gregory A. Dekaban
Gregory A. Dekaban University of Western Ontario
Michael J. Strong
Michael J. Strong University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph S. Gati
Joseph S. Gati University of Western Ontario
Richard W. J. Neufeld
Richard W. J. Neufeld University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open versatile career options for those interested in neuroscience and related fields. Many students consider pursuing easiest degree to get programs to quickly enter the workforce while gaining foundational knowledge in psychology or biology. These degrees can be a cost-effective choice for individuals seeking a streamlined educational path.

For those looking to boost their credentials, specialized certifications that pay well can complement a neuroscience background. Certificates in fields such as data analysis or clinical research may open doors to higher-paying roles, especially in healthcare or research-driven industries.

If your interests intersect with mental health and behavior, there are cheap online msw programs offering training in social work with clinical or research concentrations. Alternatively, those thinking of serving neurodiverse communities might explore bcba certification programs online. This credential is valued for careers in applied behavior analysis and can be pursued alongside or after your neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Bartha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles