World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
71
Citations
19974
World Ranking
1572
National Ranking
670

Brian Lamb publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Lamb sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 283 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Brian Lamb D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Lamb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Lamb is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a particular emphasis on health, toxicology, mutagenesis, global and planetary change, atmospheric science, environmental engineering, and modeling and simulation.

The scientist's recent publication record includes papers covering various aspects of air quality, atmospheric chemistry, and related health impacts. Their research topics prominently involve air quality and health impacts, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality monitoring and forecasting, the impact of COVID-19 on air quality, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and climate change and health impacts.

Brian Lamb has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • Drastic Improvements in Air Quality in Ecuador during the COVID-19 Outbreak (2020), published in Aerosol and Air Quality Research
  • War Impact on Air Quality in Ukraine (2022), published in Sustainability
  • Whole-House Emission Rates and Loss Coefficients of Formaldehyde and Other Volatile Organic Compounds as a Function of the Air Change Rate (2020), published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Development of a Machine Learning Approach for Local-Scale Ozone Forecasting: Application to Kennewick, WA (2022), published in Frontiers in Big Data
  • Operational bias correction for PM2.5 using the AIRPACT air quality forecast system in the Pacific Northwest (2021), published in Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association

The venues where Brian Lamb frequently publishes include:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
  • Frontiers in Big Data
  • Aerosol and Air Quality Research
  • Sustainability

Key frequent co-authors in Brian Lamb's research are:

  • Yunha Lee
  • Rasa Žalakevičiūtė
  • Danilo Mejía
  • P. O'Keeffe
  • Kai Fan

Their work encompasses a range of topics focused on the dynamics of air pollutants and related environmental and health effects. Studies include looking at the changes in air quality related to major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and armed conflicts, as well as the development and application of forecasting models and operational corrections for air pollution monitoring systems.

Best Publications

  • Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain

    Ramón A. Alvarez;Daniel Zavala-Araiza;David R. Lyon;David T. Allen

  • Emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation and the implications for atmospheric chemistry

    Fred Fehsenfeld;Jack Calvert;Ray Fall;Paul Goldan

  • Sulfur Emissions to the Atmosphere from Natural Sources

    T. S. Bates;B. K. Lamb;A. Guenther;J. Dignon

  • Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States

    David T Allen;Vincent M Torres;James A Thomas;David W Sullivan

  • Biogenic Hydrocarbons in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer: A Review

    J. D. Fuentes;M. Lerdau;R. Atkinson;D. Baldocchi

  • Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique.

    Kristen. Johnson;Mark. Huyler;Hal. Westberg;Brian. Lamb

  • A national inventory of biogenic hydrocarbon emissions

    Brian Lamb;Alex Guenther;Hal Westberg

  • An overview of the MILAGRO 2006 Campaign: Mexico City emissions and their transport and transformation

    L. T. Molina;S. Madronich;J. S. Gaffney;E. Apel

  • Evaluation of nitrogen dioxide chemiluminescence monitors in a polluted urban environment

    E. J. Dunlea;E. J. Dunlea;S. C. Herndon;D. D. Nelson;R. M. Volkamer;R. M. Volkamer

  • Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions

    Daniel Zavala-Araiza;David R. Lyon;Ramón A. Alvarez;Kenneth J. Davis

  • A biogenic hydrocarbon emission inventory for the U.S.A. using a simple forest canopy model

    B Lamb;H Westberg;T Pierce

  • Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column

    Paul I. Palmer;Paul I. Palmer;Dorian S. Abbot;Tzung-May Fu;Daniel J. Jacob

  • Air quality in North America's most populous city - overview of the MCMA-2003 campaign

    L. T. Molina;C. E. Kolb;B. de Foy;B. de Foy;B. K. Lamb

  • Biogenic hydrocarbon emissions from deciduous and coniferous trees in the United States

    Brian Lamb;Hal Westberg;Gene Allwine;Tim Quarles

  • Atmospheric oxidation in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) during April 2003

    T. R. Shirley;W. H. Brune;X. Ren;J. Mao

  • A Preliminary Synthesis of Modeled Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Regional Ozone Concentrations

    C. P. Weaver;X. Z. Liang;J. Zhu;P. J. Adams

  • The influence of atmospheric pressure on landfill methane emissions.

    P.M Czepiel;J.H Shorter;B Mosher;E Allwine

  • Direct Measurements Show Decreasing Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Local Distribution Systems in the United States

    Brian K. Lamb;Steven L. Edburg;Thomas W. Ferrara;Touché Howard

  • Isoprene fluxes measured by enclosure, relaxed eddy accumulation, surface layer gradient, mixed layer gradient, and mixed layer mass balance techniques

    Alex Guenther;William Baugh;Ken Davis;Gary Hampton

  • Landfill methane emissions measured by enclosure and atmospheric tracer methods

    P. M. Czepiel;B. Mosher;R. C. Harriss;J. H. Shorter

Frequent Co-Authors

Hal Westberg
Hal Westberg Washington State University
Alex Guenther
Alex Guenther University of California, Irvine
Claudio O. Stöckle
Claudio O. Stöckle Washington State University
Bertram T. Jobson
Bertram T. Jobson Washington State University
Paul B. Shepson
Paul B. Shepson Stony Brook University
Eric P. Salathé
Eric P. Salathé University of Washington
Mary Anne Carroll
Mary Anne Carroll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christine Wiedinmyer
Christine Wiedinmyer University of Colorado Boulder
Scott C. Herndon
Scott C. Herndon Aerodyne Research
Charles E. Kolb
Charles E. Kolb Aerodyne Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related degree options can broaden career prospects. Many institutions offer flexible programs, including specialized tracks and bridge programs, to enhance your expertise and qualifications. For example, an online eds to edd bridge program can be a valuable path for those aiming to advance into educational leadership roles within environmental fields.

Social work intersects with environmental issues, especially in community health and sustainability initiatives. Pursuing a dsw online programs offers a way to gain advanced skills and contribute to socially responsible environmental projects.

If you're looking for broad but practical credentials, some of the best affordable online general studies degree programs provide foundational knowledge that can complement specialized environmental education. These degrees often pave the way to diverse career options.

For those seeking quicker entry into the workforce, considering some of the easy bachelor degrees might help build essential skills while focusing on environmental topics, balancing academic rigor with flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Lamb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles