World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
60
Citations
18307
World Ranking
1190
National Ranking
319

Claudio O. Stöckle publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio O. Stöckle sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 229 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Claudio O. Stöckle D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio O. Stöckle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

Claudio O. Stöckle spends much of his time researching Agronomy, Climate change, Cropping system, Crop and Crop yield. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Agronomy, focusing on Transpiration and, on occasion, Water use and Animal science. His Climate change research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Hydrology, Climatology, Greenhouse gas and Yield.

His Yield research incorporates elements of Agriculture and Atmospheric sciences. He works mostly in the field of Cropping system, limiting it down to concerns involving Agricultural productivity and, occasionally, Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. In his study, Watershed, Soil water, Crop coefficient and Soil horizon is inextricably linked to Agricultural engineering, which falls within the broad field of Crop yield.

His most cited work include:

  • CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model (959 citations)
  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)
  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change (749 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Climate change, Irrigation, Agriculture and Crop. While the research belongs to areas of Agronomy, he spends his time largely on the problem of Soil water, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Water content and Regression. His Climate change research also works with subjects such as

  • Atmospheric sciences, which have a strong connection to Cropping system,
  • Cropping that connect with fields like Agroforestry.

His Irrigation research integrates issues from Water use, Canopy and Transpiration. His work in Agriculture tackles topics such as Hydrology which are related to areas like Surface runoff. His Crop research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biomass, Cultivar, Yield and Phenology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (32.41%)
  • Climate change (22.22%)
  • Irrigation (20.37%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Climate change (22.22%)
  • Agronomy (32.41%)
  • Agriculture (17.13%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Claudio O. Stöckle mainly investigates Climate change, Agronomy, Agriculture, Crop and Water resource management. His studies in Climate change integrate themes in fields like Cropping, Atmospheric sciences and Sustainability. His Agronomy study incorporates themes from Crop cultivation, Global change and Water cycle.

His Agriculture research incorporates themes from Environmental economics, Crop yield and Irrigation. Claudio O. Stöckle focuses mostly in the field of Crop yield, narrowing it down to topics relating to Surface runoff and, in certain cases, Soil water. His Crop study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biomass, Cultivar, Yield and Sowing.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein (97 citations)
  • Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop-environment-management interactions. (44 citations)
  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Statistics
  • Ecology

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Climate change, Agronomy, Agriculture, Crop and Phenology. His Climate change study combines topics in areas such as Cropping, Watershed, Irrigation and Precipitation. His work carried out in the field of Agronomy brings together such families of science as Co2 concentration and Global change.

Claudio O. Stöckle has included themes like Matching, Propensity score matching and Environmental resource management in his Agriculture study. His work carried out in the field of Crop brings together such families of science as Biomass and Yield. His study in Phenology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Squared deviations, Eddy covariance, Range, Crop water use and Evapotranspiration.

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model

    Claudio O. Stöckle;Marcello Donatelli;Roger Nelson

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model: Water/nitrogen budgets and crop yield☆

    Claudio O. Stockle;Steve A. Martin;Gaylon S. Campbell

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on cropping systems: model predictions at two Italian locations

    Francesco N Tubiello;Marcello Donatelli;C Rosenzweig;Claudio O Stockle

  • Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes.

    Mladen Todorovic;Rossella Albrizio;Ljubomir Zivotic;Marie-Therese Abi Saab

  • Estimating water erosion and sediment yield with GIS, RUSLE, and SEDD

    C. Fernandez;J. Q. Wu;D. K. McCool;D. K. McCool;C. O. Stöckle

  • A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: Part I—Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis

    Claudio O. Stockle;Jimmy R. Williams;Norman J. Rosenberg;C.Allan Jones

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • Variability in crop radiation-use efficiency associated with vapor-pressure deficit

    Claudio O. Stockle;James R. Kiniry

  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming

    Bing Liu;Pierre Martre;Frank Ewert;John R. Porter;John R. Porter;John R. Porter

  • Climate change impacts on water management and irrigated agriculture in the Yakima River Basin, Washington, USA

    Julie A. Vano;Michael J. Scott;Nathalie Voisin;Claudio O. Stöckle

  • Predicting maize phenology: intercomparison of functions for developmental response to temperature

    S. Kumudini;Fernando Hector Andrade;K.J. Boote;G.A. Brown

  • Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop-environment-management interactions.

    Daniel Wallach;Pierre Martre;Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng

  • Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi‐arid environment

    Garry J. O'Leary;Brendan Christy;James Nuttall;Neil Huth

  • Variability of Barley Radiation-Use Efficiency

    Armen R. Kemanian;Claudio O. Stöckle;David R. Huggins

  • A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems

    C. O. Stockle;R.I. Papendick;K.E. Saxton;G.S. Campbell

  • Calibration and validation of APSIM-Wheat and CERES-Wheat for spring wheat under rainfed conditions

    Mukhtar Ahmed;Mustazhar Nasib Akram;Muhammad Asim;Muhammad Aslam

  • Evaluation of CropSyst for cropping systems at two locations of northern and southern Italy

    M. Donatelli;C. Stöckle;E. Ceotto;M. Rinaldi

  • Evaluation of estimated weather data for calculating Penman-Monteith reference crop evapotranspiration

    Claudio O. Stöckle;Jim Kjelgaard;Gianni Bellocchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Andrew J. Challinor
Andrew J. Challinor University of Leeds
Pierre Martre
Pierre Martre INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Roberto C. Izaurralde
Roberto C. Izaurralde University of Maryland, College Park
Joost Wolf
Joost Wolf Wageningen University & Research
Katharina Waha
Katharina Waha Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Kenneth J. Boote
Kenneth J. Boote University of Florida
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Iwan Supit
Iwan Supit Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Claudio O. Stöckle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles