World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
13022
World Ranking
9014
National Ranking
336

Katharina Waha publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katharina Waha sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Katharina Waha D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katharina Waha sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katharina Waha is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences with a notable emphasis on climate change impacts on agriculture and related areas.

The main fields of study for Katharina Waha include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these broad fields, their work spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Soil Science
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

The research topics Katharina Waha has contributed to encompass a range of agricultural challenges and solutions:

  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Agricultural risk and resilience
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access

Several venues regularly feature their work, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Agronomy for Sustainable Development
  • Global Food Security
  • Regional Environmental Change
  • Global Environmental Change
  • Environmental Research Letters

Key recent papers authored by Katharina Waha include:

  • "Multiple cropping systems of the world and the potential for increasing cropping intensity" (2020, Global Environmental Change)
  • "The benefits and trade-offs of agricultural diversity for food security in low- and middle-income countries: A review of existing knowledge and evidence" (2022, Global Food Security)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Katharina Waha are:

  • Francesco Tacconi
  • Mark T. van Wijk
  • Mario Herrero
  • Cécile Godde
  • Jonathan J. Ojeda

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Trends in Global Agricultural Land Use: Implications for Environmental Health and Food Security

    Navin Ramankutty;Zia Mehrabi;Katharina Waha;Larissa Jarvis

  • How Do Various Maize Crop Models Vary in Their Responses to Climate Change Factors

    Simona Bassu;Nadine Brisson;Jean Louis Durand;Kenneth Boote

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis

    Mario Herrero;Philip K Thornton;Philip K Thornton;Brendan Power;Jessica R Bogard;Jessica R Bogard

  • Adaptation to climate change through the choice of cropping system and sowing date in sub-Saharan Africa

    K. Waha;C. Müller;A. Bondeau;A. Bondeau;J.P. Dietrich

  • Climate change impacts in the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA) region and their implications for vulnerable population groups

    Katharina Waha;Katharina Waha;Linda Krummenauer;Sophie Adams;Valentin Aich

  • Climate-driven simulation of global crop sowing dates

    K. Waha;L. G. J. van Bussel;L. G. J. van Bussel;C. Müller;A. Bondeau

  • Global Water Availability and Requirements for Future Food Production

    D. Gerten;J. Heinke;H. Hoff;H. Biemans

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description

    Sibyll Schaphoff;Werner von Bloh;Anja Rammig;Kirsten Thonicke

  • Agricultural diversification as an important strategy for achieving food security in Africa

    Katharina Waha;Mark T. van Wijk;Steffen Fritz;Linda See

  • Multiple cropping systems of the world and the potential for increasing cropping intensity

    Katharina Waha;Jan Philipp Dietrich;Felix T. Portmann;Stefan Siebert

  • Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa

    Mats Lindeskog;A. Arneth;A. Bondeau;A. Bondeau;K. Waha

  • Crop rotation modelling—A European model intercomparison

    Chris Kollas;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Claas Nendel;Kiril Manevski

  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming

    Bing Liu;Pierre Martre;Frank Ewert;John R. Porter;John R. Porter;John R. Porter

  • Temperature and Precipitation Effects on Wheat Yield Across a European Transect: a Crop Model Ensemble Analysis Using Impact Response Surfaces

    N. Pirttioja;T. R. Carter;S. Fronzek;M. Bindi

  • Turn down the heat: confronting the new climate normal

    S. Adams;V. Aich;T. Albrecht;F. Baarsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Müller
Christoph Müller Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Alex C. Ruane
Alex C. Ruane Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Kurt Christian Kersebaum Czech Academy of Sciences
Claas Nendel
Claas Nendel University of Potsdam
Zhigan Zhao
Zhigan Zhao Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Fulu Tao
Fulu Tao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Sebastian Gayler
Sebastian Gayler University of Hohenheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences opens doors to diverse academic and career opportunities, many of which are accessible online. For students seeking advanced specialization, fully funded dsw programs can serve as a model for funding options and program structures that might inspire similar opportunities in environmental fields.

Many learners prioritize cost-effectiveness, making a budget friendly online general studies degree appealing. These programs provide a flexible foundation, allowing students to tailor their education toward environmental topics.

For those new to higher education or looking for a straightforward start, an easiest degree to get might be an advantageous stepping stone. Combining ease with relevance can help build confidence and essential skills.

Specialized fields like geology are integral to environmental science. Prospective students can explore online geology programs to gain technical knowledge crucial for understanding earth processes and environmental impact assessment.

Best Scientists Citing Katharina Waha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles