World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
24781
World Ranking
15630
National Ranking
7871

Ricardo C. Cury publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo C. Cury sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 339 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ricardo C. Cury D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo C. Cury sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ricardo C. Cury is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States and specializes in the field of Medicine, with a primary focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Their research also covers subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work centers on areas related to Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging. Additional topics include Radiation Dose and Imaging, Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity, and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health.

Ricardo C. Cury has contributed to several recent publications. Notable papers include:

  • CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System, 2022, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography / North American Society of Cardiovascular Imaging - Expert Consensus Document on Coronary CT Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque, 2020, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System, 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI), 2022, Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborations in cardiovascular imaging and diagnostics and include Matthew J. Budoff, Todd C. Villines, Leslee J. Shaw, Jonathan Fialkow, and Jonathon Leipsic.

Ricardo C. Cury publishes extensively in venues focusing on cardiovascular imaging and related fields. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Best Publications

  • In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients

    Ahmed Tawakol;Raymond Q. Migrino;Gregory G. Bashian;Shahinaz Bedri

  • SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.

    Jonathon Leipsic;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Ricardo Cury

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Plaque Morphology and Composition in Culprit and Stable Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Lesions in Stable Angina by Multidetector Computed Tomography

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Moselewski;Koen Nieman;Ik Kyung Jang

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Absence of Coronary Artery Calcification

    Ammar Sarwar;Leslee J. Shaw;Michael D. Shapiro;Ron Blankstein

  • Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis.

    Manish Motwani;Damini Dey;Daniel S. Berman;Guido Germano

  • Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Early Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Bamberg;Claudia U. Chae;John H. Nichols

  • Predictive Value of 16-Slice Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Patient- Versus Segment-Based Analysis

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Moselewski;Ricardo C. Cury;Maros Ferencik

  • CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology

    Ricardo C. Cury;Suhny Abbara;Stephan Achenbach;Arthur Agatston

  • Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.

    Ron Blankstein;Ron Blankstein;Leon D. Shturman;Ian S. Rogers;Jose A. Rocha-Filho

  • Coronary Atherosclerotic Precursors of Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Hyuk Jae Chang;Fay Y. Lin;Sang Eun Lee;Daniele Andreini

  • A systematic review: Burden and severity of subclinical cardiovascular disease among those with nonalcoholic fatty liver; Should we care?

    Ebenezer T. Oni;Arthur S. Agatston;Arthur S. Agatston;Michael J. Blaha;Jonathan Fialkow

  • Feasibility of FDG Imaging of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison Between Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Angina

    Ian S. Rogers;Khurram Nasir;Amparo L. Figueroa;Ricardo C. Cury

  • Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry)

    Martin Hadamitzky;Stephan Achenbach;Mouaz Al-Mallah;Daniel Berman

  • Cardiac tumors: optimal cardiac MR sequences and spectrum of imaging appearances.

    David H. O'Donnell;Suhny Abbara;Vithaya Chaithiraphan;Kibar Yared

  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance With T2-Weighted Imaging Improves Detection of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department

    Ricardo C. Cury;Khalid Shash;John T. Nagurney;Guido Rosito

  • Incremental Value of Adenosine-induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Dual-Source CT at Cardiac CT Angiography

    Jose A. Rocha-Filho;Ron Blankstein;Leonid D. Shturman;Hiram G. Bezerra

  • Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

    Ronen Gurvitch;John G. Webb;Ren Yuan;Mark Johnson

  • Reperfused myocardial infarction: Contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging

    Koen Nieman;Michael D. Shapiro;Maros Ferencik;Cesar H. Nomura

  • Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound

    Fabian Moselewski;Dieter Ropers;Karsten Pohle;Udo Hoffmann

  • CAC-DRS: Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT)

    Harvey S. Hecht;Michael J. Blaha;Ella A. Kazerooni;Ricardo C. Cury

Frequent Co-Authors

James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Mouaz H. Al-Mallah
Mouaz H. Al-Mallah Houston Methodist
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Filippo Cademartiri
Filippo Cademartiri Fondazione Monasterio
Gianluca Pontone
Gianluca Pontone University of Milan
Daniele Andreini
Daniele Andreini University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities in healthcare, even for those not following the traditional route to an MD. For example, direct entry np programs for non nurses online allow students with non-nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles through accelerated Master’s programs. These pathways can offer a faster, more flexible entry into the profession.

Additionally, some direct entry nursing programs are designed for accessibility, providing more students with the chance to begin nursing studies without extensive prerequisites. Accessibility is also enhanced by many nursing schools that don't require teas, meaning you can apply without standardized entrance exams like the TEAS or HESI.

For those interested in behind-the-scenes roles in healthcare, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid provide specialized training with flexible financial options. These programs prepare you for crucial administrative jobs that support the healthcare system, all available online and often with assistance for paying tuition.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo C. Cury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles