World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard W. J. Neufeld

Richard W. J. Neufeld

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2974 2734 184 170 209 15491

Richard W. J. Neufeld publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard W. J. Neufeld between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard W. J. Neufeld published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2007. 10 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2007. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard W. J. Neufeld: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 1
1972 2
1973 1
1974 3
1975 2
1976 3
1977 7
1978 2
1979 2
1980 3
1981 4
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 7
1988 3
1989 5
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 3
1996 0
1997 2
1998 5
1999 6
2000 1
2001 1
2002 7
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 1
2007 10
2008 5
2009 6
2010 7
2011 6
2012 8
2013 2
2014 2
2015 8
2016 4
2017 10
2018 9
2019 6
2020 4
2021 8
2022 5
2023 5
2024 1
2025 9
Total 221
Download as CSV

Richard W. J. Neufeld publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 209
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard W. J. Neufeld D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard W. J. Neufeld is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Within these domains, their subfields of study include cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to brain function and mental health. Notably, their research addresses functional brain connectivity studies, traumatic brain injury research, mental health research topics, posttraumatic stress disorder research, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, memory and neural mechanisms, as well as stress responses and cortisol.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Classifying heterogeneous presentations of PTSD via the default mode, central executive, and salience networks with machine learning, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: A preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups, 2021, Brain and Behavior
  • Predicting youth aggression with empathy and callous unemotional traits: A Meta-analytic review, 2022, Clinical Psychology Review
  • The vicious cycle of psychopathology and stressful life events: A meta-analytic review testing the stress generation model., 2023, Psychological Bulletin

The scholar frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Maria Densmore, Ruth A. Lanius, Jean Théberge, Seth G. Disner, and Richard J. Davidson.

Their publications appear repeatedly in prominent scientific journals and venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage Clinical, Brain and Behavior, NeuroImage, and Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging.

Best Publications

  • Neural Correlates of Traumatic Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Functional MRI Investigation

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Spontaneous Low-Frequency Fluctuations in the BOLD Signal in Schizophrenic Patients: Anomalies in the Default Network

    Robyn L. Bluhm;Jodi Miller;Ruth A. Lanius;Elizabeth A. Osuch

  • Brain activation during script-driven imagery induced dissociative responses in PTSD: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A Lanius;Peter C Williamson;Kristine Boksman;Maria Densmore

  • Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma.

    Robyn L Bluhm;Peter C Williamson;Elizabeth A Osuch;Paul A Frewen

  • “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health

    Rebecca Stead;Matthew J. Shanahan;Richard W.J. Neufeld

  • Glutamate and glutamine measured with 4.0 T proton MRS in never-treated patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

    Jean Théberge;Robert Bartha;Dick J. Drost;Ravi S. Menon

  • The Nature of Traumatic Memories: A 4-T fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Functional connectivity of dissociative responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A. Lanius;Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Robyn L. Bluhm;Maria Densmore

  • Meta-analysis of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Resting state default-mode network connectivity in early depression using a seed region-of-interest analysis: Decreased connectivity with caudate nucleus

    Robyn Bluhm;Peter Williamson;Ruth Lanius;Jean Théberge

  • Default mode network connectivity as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity in acutely traumatized subjects

    R. A. Lanius;R. L. Bluhm;N. J. Coupland;K. M. Hegadoren

  • Measurement of glutamate and glutamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of never-treated schizophrenic patients and healthy controls by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    R. Bartha;P. C. Williamson;D. J. Drost;A. Malla

  • Selective attention to threat versus reward: Meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task

    Paul A Frewen;David J A Dozois;Marc F Joanisse;Richard W J Neufeld

  • Glutamate and glutamine in the anterior cingulate and thalamus of medicated patients with chronic schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects measured with 4.0-T proton MRS.

    Jean Théberge;Yousef Al-Semaan;Peter C. Williamson;Ravi S. Menon

  • The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: Amygdala downregulation via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.

    Andrew A. Nicholson;Daniela Rabellino;Maria Densmore;Paul A. Frewen

  • Longitudinal grey-matter and glutamatergic losses in first-episode schizophrenia

    Jean Théberge;Kate E. Williamson;Naoko Aoyama;Dick J. Drost

  • Clinical and neural correlates of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;Ruth A. Lanius;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld

  • Clear danger: situational determinants of the appraisal of threat.

    Randolph J. Paterson;Richard W. J. Neufeld

  • Default mode network connectivity: effects of age, sex, and analytic approach.

    Robyn L. Bluhm;Elizabeth A. Osuch;Ruth A. Lanius;Kristine Boksman

  • A short echo 1H spectroscopy and volumetric MRI study of the corpus striatum in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and comparison subjects

    Robert Bartha;Murray B. Stein;Peter C. Williamson;Dick J. Drost

  • Advances in the investigation of psychological stress

    Richard W. J. Neufeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Théberge
Jean Théberge University of Western Ontario
Ruth A. Lanius
Ruth A. Lanius University of Western Ontario
Maria Densmore
Maria Densmore University of Western Ontario
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Paul A. Frewen
Paul A. Frewen University of Western Ontario
Nagalingam Rajakumar
Nagalingam Rajakumar University of Western Ontario
Ashok Malla
Ashok Malla McGill University
Robert Bartha
Robert Bartha University of Western Ontario
David J. A. Dozois
David J. A. Dozois University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a variety of pathways, especially in the growing field of mental health counseling. Many students choose online degrees for greater flexibility, allowing them to balance studies with work and other commitments. When considering career options, it’s important to understand the unique certification and educational requirements based on your intended location.

For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista need to meet California’s licensing standards, which may include specific coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, if you want to learn how to become a mental health counselor in Cincinnati, Ohio requires its own set of exams and accredited degrees.

Navigating the Cleveland mental health counselor certification requirements or the mental health counselor requirements in Colorado Springs may differ from other regions, including background checks, state-specific tests, and supervised practice hours. Researching these details can help you pursue the right online degree and start a rewarding career supporting others’ wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. J. Neufeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles