World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard W. J. Neufeld

Richard W. J. Neufeld

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
15491
World Ranking
2974
National Ranking
184

Richard W. J. Neufeld publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard W. J. Neufeld D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard W. J. Neufeld is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Within these domains, their subfields of study include cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to brain function and mental health. Notably, their research addresses functional brain connectivity studies, traumatic brain injury research, mental health research topics, posttraumatic stress disorder research, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, memory and neural mechanisms, as well as stress responses and cortisol.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Classifying heterogeneous presentations of PTSD via the default mode, central executive, and salience networks with machine learning, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: A preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groups, 2021, Brain and Behavior
  • Predicting youth aggression with empathy and callous unemotional traits: A Meta-analytic review, 2022, Clinical Psychology Review
  • The vicious cycle of psychopathology and stressful life events: A meta-analytic review testing the stress generation model., 2023, Psychological Bulletin

The scholar frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Maria Densmore, Ruth A. Lanius, Jean Théberge, Seth G. Disner, and Richard J. Davidson.

Their publications appear repeatedly in prominent scientific journals and venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage Clinical, Brain and Behavior, NeuroImage, and Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging.

Best Publications

  • Neural Correlates of Traumatic Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Functional MRI Investigation

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Spontaneous Low-Frequency Fluctuations in the BOLD Signal in Schizophrenic Patients: Anomalies in the Default Network

    Robyn L. Bluhm;Jodi Miller;Ruth A. Lanius;Elizabeth A. Osuch

  • Brain activation during script-driven imagery induced dissociative responses in PTSD: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A Lanius;Peter C Williamson;Kristine Boksman;Maria Densmore

  • Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma.

    Robyn L Bluhm;Peter C Williamson;Elizabeth A Osuch;Paul A Frewen

  • “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health

    Rebecca Stead;Matthew J. Shanahan;Richard W.J. Neufeld

  • Glutamate and glutamine measured with 4.0 T proton MRS in never-treated patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

    Jean Théberge;Robert Bartha;Dick J. Drost;Ravi S. Menon

  • The Nature of Traumatic Memories: A 4-T fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis

    Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Maria Densmore;Kristine Boksman

  • Functional connectivity of dissociative responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

    Ruth A. Lanius;Ruth A. Lanius;Peter C. Williamson;Robyn L. Bluhm;Maria Densmore

  • Meta-analysis of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld;Ruth A. Lanius

  • Resting state default-mode network connectivity in early depression using a seed region-of-interest analysis: Decreased connectivity with caudate nucleus

    Robyn Bluhm;Peter Williamson;Ruth Lanius;Jean Théberge

  • Default mode network connectivity as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity in acutely traumatized subjects

    R. A. Lanius;R. L. Bluhm;N. J. Coupland;K. M. Hegadoren

  • Measurement of glutamate and glutamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of never-treated schizophrenic patients and healthy controls by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    R. Bartha;P. C. Williamson;D. J. Drost;A. Malla

  • Selective attention to threat versus reward: Meta-analysis and neural-network modeling of the dot-probe task

    Paul A Frewen;David J A Dozois;Marc F Joanisse;Richard W J Neufeld

  • Glutamate and glutamine in the anterior cingulate and thalamus of medicated patients with chronic schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects measured with 4.0-T proton MRS.

    Jean Théberge;Yousef Al-Semaan;Peter C. Williamson;Ravi S. Menon

  • The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: Amygdala downregulation via real-time fMRI neurofeedback.

    Andrew A. Nicholson;Daniela Rabellino;Maria Densmore;Paul A. Frewen

  • Longitudinal grey-matter and glutamatergic losses in first-episode schizophrenia

    Jean Théberge;Kate E. Williamson;Naoko Aoyama;Dick J. Drost

  • Clinical and neural correlates of alexithymia in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Paul A. Frewen;Ruth A. Lanius;David J. A. Dozois;Richard W. J. Neufeld

  • Clear danger: situational determinants of the appraisal of threat.

    Randolph J. Paterson;Richard W. J. Neufeld

  • Default mode network connectivity: effects of age, sex, and analytic approach.

    Robyn L. Bluhm;Elizabeth A. Osuch;Ruth A. Lanius;Kristine Boksman

  • A short echo 1H spectroscopy and volumetric MRI study of the corpus striatum in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and comparison subjects

    Robert Bartha;Murray B. Stein;Peter C. Williamson;Dick J. Drost

  • Advances in the investigation of psychological stress

    Richard W. J. Neufeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Théberge
Jean Théberge University of Western Ontario
Ruth A. Lanius
Ruth A. Lanius University of Western Ontario
Maria Densmore
Maria Densmore University of Western Ontario
Ravi S. Menon
Ravi S. Menon University of Western Ontario
Margaret C. McKinnon
Margaret C. McKinnon McMaster University
Paul A. Frewen
Paul A. Frewen University of Western Ontario
Nagalingam Rajakumar
Nagalingam Rajakumar University of Western Ontario
Ashok Malla
Ashok Malla McGill University
Robert Bartha
Robert Bartha University of Western Ontario
David J. A. Dozois
David J. A. Dozois University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a variety of pathways, especially in the growing field of mental health counseling. Many students choose online degrees for greater flexibility, allowing them to balance studies with work and other commitments. When considering career options, it’s important to understand the unique certification and educational requirements based on your intended location.

For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista need to meet California’s licensing standards, which may include specific coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, if you want to learn how to become a mental health counselor in Cincinnati, Ohio requires its own set of exams and accredited degrees.

Navigating the Cleveland mental health counselor certification requirements or the mental health counselor requirements in Colorado Springs may differ from other regions, including background checks, state-specific tests, and supervised practice hours. Researching these details can help you pursue the right online degree and start a rewarding career supporting others’ wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. J. Neufeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles