World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
13856
World Ranking
4360
National Ranking
472

James M. Stone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Stone sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James M. Stone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Stone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Stone is affiliated with Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom. Their research output spans significant contributions primarily in the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with notable subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychiatry, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and pharmacology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, with a focus on neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, tryptophan and brain disorders, functional brain connectivity studies, schizophrenia research and treatment, treatment of major depression, advanced MRI techniques and applications, and gut microbiota and health.

James M. Stone has authored and co-authored several recent papers, including:

  • Perturbations in Gut Microbiota Composition in Psychiatric Disorders, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Ketamine: A tale of two enantiomers, 2020, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Association of Age, Antipsychotic Medication, and Symptom Severity in Schizophrenia With Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Brain Glutamate Level, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Acceptability, Tolerability, and Estimates of Putative Treatment Effects of Probiotics as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Depression, 2023, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Glutamate in schizophrenia: Neurodevelopmental perspectives and drug development, 2020, Schizophrenia Research

The frequent co-authors collaborating with James M. Stone include Philip McGuire, Gemma Modinos, Oliver Howes, Allan H. Young, and Alice Egerton.

Publications by Stone have appeared repeatedly in several respected venues, such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Translational Psychiatry, and Neuroscience Applied.

Best Publications

  • Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin

    Robin L. Carhart-Harris;David Erritzoe;Tim Williams;James M. Stone

  • Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: an update for the 21st century

    Oliver Howes;Robert McCutcheon;James Michael Stone

  • Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology.

    Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Paul D Morrison;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Rocio Martin-Santos

  • Perturbations in Gut Microbiota Composition in Psychiatric Disorders. A Review and Meta-analysis

    Viktoriya L. Nikolova;Megan R. B. Hall;Lindsay J. Hall;Lindsay J. Hall;Lindsay J. Hall;Anthony J. Cleare;Anthony J. Cleare

  • Glutamate and dopamine dysregulation in schizophrenia--a synthesis and selective review.

    James M. Stone;Paul D. Morrison;Lyn S. Pilowsky

  • Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment

    Amir Englund;Paul D Morrison;Judith Nottage;Dominic Hague

  • Complex I inhibitors induce dose-dependent apoptosis in PC12 cells: relevance to Parkinson's disease.

    A. Hartley;J. M. Stone;C. Heron;J. M. Cooper

  • Antipsychotic treatment resistance in schizophrenia associated with elevated glutamate levels but normal dopamine function.

    Arsime Demjaha;Alice Egerton;Robin M. Murray;Shitij Kapur

  • First in vivo evidence of an NMDA receptor deficit in medication-free schizophrenic patients.

    Lyn Pilowsky;Lyn Pilowsky;Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan;James Stone;K Erlandsson

  • Ketamine effects on brain GABA and glutamate levels with 1H-MRS: relationship to ketamine-induced psychopathology.

    J M Stone;C Dietrich;R Edden;M A Mehta

  • The blood-brain barrier in psychosis.

    Thomas A Pollak;Svetlana Drndarski;James M Stone;Anthony S David

  • Neuroanatomical abnormalities that predate the onset of psychosis: a multicenter study.

    Andrea Mechelli;Anita Riecher-Rössler;Eva M. Meisenzahl;Stefania Tognin

  • Glutamate Dysfunction in People with Prodromal Symptoms of Psychosis: Relationship to Gray Matter Volume

    James M Stone;Fern Day;Helen Tsagaraki;Isabel Valli

  • Functional Connectivity Measures After Psilocybin Inform a Novel Hypothesis of Early Psychosis

    Robin L Carhart-Harris;Robert Leech;David Erritzoe;Tim M Williams

  • Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Patients Show Elevated Anterior Cingulate Cortex Glutamate Compared to Treatment-Responsive

    Elias Mouchlianitis;Elias Mouchlianitis;Michael A. P. Bloomfield;Michael A. P. Bloomfield;Vincent Law;Katherine Beck

  • Anterior Cingulate Glutamate Levels Related to Clinical Status Following Treatment in First-Episode Schizophrenia

    Alice Egerton;Stefan Brugger;Stefan Brugger;Marie Raffin;Gareth J Barker

  • Ketamine: A tale of two enantiomers.

    Luke A Jelen;Allan H Young;Allan H Young;James M Stone;James M Stone

  • Functional neuroimaging in schizophrenia: diagnosis and drug discovery.

    Philip McGuire;Oliver D Howes;James Stone;Paolo Fusar-Poli

  • Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Illness Stage in Schizophrenia—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Stefan Brugger;John M. Davis;John M. Davis;Stefan Leucht;James M. Stone;James M. Stone

  • Determinants of treatment response in first-episode psychosis: an 18 F-DOPA PET study

    Sameer Jauhar;Mattia Veronese;Matthew M Nour;Matthew M Nour;Maria Rogdaki;Maria Rogdaki

  • Drug models of schizophrenia

    Hannah Steeds;Robin L. Carhart-Harris;James M. Stone

  • Altered relationship between hippocampal glutamate levels and striatal dopamine function in subjects at ultra high risk of psychosis.

    James M. Stone;Oliver D. Howes;Oliver D. Howes;Alice Egerton;Alice Egerton;Joseph Kambeitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Paul Allen
Paul Allen Royal Holloway University of London
Alice Egerton
Alice Egerton King's College London
Gareth J. Barker
Gareth J. Barker King's College London
Jesus Perez
Jesus Perez University of Cambridge
Anthony A. Grace
Anthony A. Grace University of Pittsburgh
Allan H. Young
Allan H. Young King's College London
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli King's College London
Sagnik Bhattacharyya
Sagnik Bhattacharyya King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a world of flexibility and affordability for students aiming to balance education with other commitments. Numerous accredited universities across the USA now offer digital options that can lead directly into diverse psychology career paths or advanced study.

For those seeking cost-effective programs, there are excellent resources to help compare tuition and value. For example, the Minnesota cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree guide highlights affordable choices in the Midwest. Similarly, students in the Northeast can consult the New York cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree listing to find budget-friendly options tailored to their region.

The South also features an array of accessible programs, as shown in this overview of affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in the South. Those living in central urban areas can consider focused guides such as affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in St. Louis.

Online psychology degrees can lay the groundwork for rewarding roles in counseling, human resources, social work, or further specialization in graduate study. Begin your journey by comparing programs that meet your needs and budget.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles