World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
France
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
78
Citations
45245
World Ranking
1660
National Ranking
70

Jocelyn Laporte publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyn Laporte sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 282 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Jocelyn Laporte D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jocelyn Laporte sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in France Leader Award

Overview

Jocelyn Laporte is affiliated with the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in France. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. They have contributed extensively to Medicine as well, producing a substantial body of work that encompasses both foundational and applied aspects of molecular biology and genetics.

The main subfields in which Jocelyn Laporte has conducted research include Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. This broad range of expertise underpins their study of various biological and medical topics.

Their research addresses significant topics such as:

  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Nuclear Structure and Function

Jocelyn Laporte has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, notably including Johann Böhm, Roberto Silva-Rojas, Xavière Lornage, David J. Reiss, and Belinda S. Cowling. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse and rich publication portfolio.

The scientist has published primarily in several venues known for their focus on neuromuscular and molecular biology research. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • JCI Insight
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jocelyn Laporte include:

  • STIM1/ORAI1 Loss-of-Function and Gain-of-Function Mutations Inversely Impact on SOCE and Calcium Homeostasis and Cause Multi-Systemic Mirror Diseases (2020, Frontiers in Physiology)
  • MISTIC: A prediction tool to reveal disease-relevant deleterious missense variants (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Common Pathogenic Mechanisms in Centronuclear and Myotubular Myopathies and Latest Treatment Advances (2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Pathogenic Variants in the Myosin Chaperone UNC-45B Cause Progressive Myopathy with Eccentric Cores (2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • Heterozygous frameshift variants in HNRNPA2B1 cause early-onset oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (2022, Nature Communications)

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • A gene mutated in X–linked myotubular myopathy defines a new putative tyrosine phosphatase family conserved in yeast

    Jocelyn Laporte;Ling Jia Hu;Christine Kretz;Jean-Louis Mandel

  • Mutations in dynamin 2 cause dominant centronuclear myopathy.

    Marc Bitoun;Svetlana Maugenre;Pierre-Yves Jeannet;Emmanuelle Lacène

  • Mutations in amphiphysin 2 ( BIN1 ) disrupt interaction with dynamin 2 and cause autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy

    Anne-Sophie Nicot;Anne Toussaint;Valérie Tosch;Christine Kretz

  • Mutations in MTMR13, a new pseudophosphatase homologue of MTMR2 and Sbf1, in two families with an autosomal recessive demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease associated with early-onset glaucoma.

    H. Azzedine;A. Bolino;T. Taïeb;N. Birouk

  • Misregulated alternative splicing of BIN1 is associated with T tubule alterations and muscle weakness in myotonic dystrophy

    Charlotte Fugier;Arnaud F Klein;Caroline Hammer;Stéphane Vassilopoulos

  • Centronuclear (myotubular) myopathy

    Heinz Jungbluth;Heinz Jungbluth;Carina Wallgren-Pettersson;Jocelyn Laporte

  • Control of autophagy initiation by phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase jumpy

    Isabelle Vergne;Esteban Roberts;Rasha A Elmaoued;Valérie Tosch

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Myotubularin, a phosphatase deficient in myotubular myopathy, acts on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate pathway

    François Blondeau;Jocelyn Laporte;Stephane Bodin;Giulio Superti-Furga

  • MTM1 mutations in X-linked myotubular myopathy

    Jocelyn Laporte;Valérie Biancalana;Stephan M. Tanner;Wolfram Kress

  • The lipid phosphatase myotubularin is essential for skeletal muscle maintenance but not for myogenesis in mice

    Anna Buj-Bello;Vincent Laugel;Nadia Messaddeq;Hala Zahreddine

  • Recessive truncating titin gene, TTN, mutations presenting as centronuclear myopathy

    Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy;Pankaj B. Agrawal;Carlos Hidalgo;Klaus Schmitz-Abe

  • A phosphoinositide conversion mechanism for exit from endosomes

    Katharina Ketel;Michael Krauss;Anne Sophie Nicot;Dmytro Puchkov

  • Myotubularins, a large disease-associated family of cooperating catalytically active and inactive phosphoinositides phosphatases

    Jocelyn Laporte;Florence Bedez;Alessandra Bolino;Jean Louis Mandel

  • T-tubule disorganization and defective excitation-contraction coupling in muscle fibers lacking myotubularin lipid phosphatase

    Lama Al-Qusairi;Norbert Weiss;Anne Toussaint;Céline Berbey

  • Constitutive Activation of the Calcium Sensor STIM1 Causes Tubular-Aggregate Myopathy

    Johann Böhm;Frédéric Chevessier;André Maues De Paula;André Maues De Paula;Catherine Koch

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Louis Mandel
Jean-Louis Mandel Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Bruno Eymard
Bruno Eymard Université Paris Cité
Jean-François Deleuze
Jean-François Deleuze University of Paris-Saclay
Anne Boland
Anne Boland University of Paris-Saclay
Alan H. Beggs
Alan H. Beggs Harvard Medical School
Carina Wallgren-Pettersson
Carina Wallgren-Pettersson University of Helsinki
Ichizo Nishino
Ichizo Nishino Tokyo Medical University
Michel Fardeau
Michel Fardeau Grenoble Alpes University
Anders Oldfors
Anders Oldfors University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics as a field of study opens doors to a diverse range of complementary online degrees and career options. Students interested in health data and healthcare management may consider programs from the best medical billing and coding schools online, which provide foundational skills in medical records and insurance billing—areas with clear overlap in genetic and medical settings.

For learners seeking a quicker path to employment, enrolling in a fast track bachelor's degree online can accelerate graduation and career advancement. Many platforms now also offer cheapest self-paced online college courses, allowing you to control your study pace and balance other commitments—an ideal option if you’re juggling work or family.

Finally, students conscious of upfront costs can take advantage of online colleges no application fee, making it easier to apply to multiple programs without financial barriers. Whether you’re aiming for hands-on laboratory work or supporting roles in healthcare and research, these flexible online pathways help shape your future in genetics and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jocelyn Laporte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles