World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Raffaele Filieri

Raffaele Filieri

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 52 863 803 14 13 123 14979

Raffaele Filieri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raffaele Filieri between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raffaele Filieri published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2023. 31 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 12 publications
2007 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raffaele Filieri: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 4
2011 2
2012 6
2013 2
2014 7
2015 8
2016 12
2017 5
2018 8
2019 7
2020 12
2021 16
2022 16
2023 23
2024 19
2025 12
Total 164
Download as CSV

Raffaele Filieri publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Filieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 120–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 123 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112 123
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Raffaele Filieri D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raffaele Filieri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54 52
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Raffaele Filieri is affiliated with Audencia Business School in France. Their research work primarily spans the fields of social sciences and business, management and accounting, with a significant focus on subfields such as sociology and political science, marketing, information systems and management, communication, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The topics covered in their research emphasize digital marketing and social media, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, technology adoption and user behaviour, customer service quality and loyalty, sharing economy and platforms, impact of technology on adolescents, and AI in service interactions.

Filieri has published extensively, with notable frequent publication venues including:

  • Journal of Business Research
  • Psychology and Marketing
  • International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
  • Tourism Management
  • Journal of Travel Research

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions," 2020, International Journal of Information Management
  • "Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of consumer research and practice," 2022, Psychology and Marketing
  • "Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers' benefits and experience," 2020, Journal of Business Research
  • "Customers' motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media," 2020, Journal of Business Research
  • "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors," 2021, Journal of Business Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Filieri include Elisabetta Raguseo, Junyun Liao, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Fulya Açikgöz, and Zhibin Lin, with several co-authorships documented for each.

Best Publications

  • E-WOM and Accommodation An Analysis of the Factors That Influence Travelers’ Adoption of Information from Online Reviews

    Raffaele Filieri;Fraser McLeay

  • Why do travelers trust TripAdvisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth

    Raffaele Filieri;Salma Alguezaui;Fraser McLeay

  • What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM

    Raffaele Filieri

  • What makes an online consumer review trustworthy

    Raffaele Filieri

  • Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services.

    Raffaele Filieri;Fraser McLeay;Bruce Tsui;Zhibin Lin

  • Resident-tourist value co-creation: The role of residents' perceived tourism impacts and life satisfaction

    Zhibin Lin;Ye Chen;Raffaele Filieri

  • Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers' benefits and experience

    Lamberto Zollo;Raffaele Filieri;Riccardo Rialti;Sukki Yoon

  • Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors

    Unknown

  • Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media

    Saleh Bazi;Saleh Bazi;Raffaele Filieri;Matthew Gorton

  • Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: sparse versus dense network

    Salma Alguezaui;Raffaele Filieri

  • What makes information in online consumer reviews diagnostic over time? The role of review relevancy, factuality, currency, source credibility and ranking score

    Raffaele Filieri;Charles F. Hofacker;Salma Alguezaui

  • Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers’ continuance intention

    Raffaele Filieri;Fulya Acikgoz;Valentina Ndou;Yogesh Dwivedi

  • Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review

    Min Yan;Raffaele Filieri;Matthew Gorton

  • The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions

    Raffaele Filieri;Zhibin Lin;Giovanni Pino;Salma Alguezaui

  • An assessment of service quality and resulting customer satisfaction in Pakistan International Airlines: Findings from foreigners and overseas Pakistani customers

    Faizan Ali;Bidit Lal Dey;Raffaele Filieri

  • Social media content aesthetic quality and customer engagement: The mediating role of entertainment and impacts on brand love and loyalty

    Unknown

  • Consumer co‐creation and new product development: a case study in the food industry

    Raffaele Filieri

  • When are extreme ratings more helpful? Empirical evidence on the moderating effects of review characteristics and product type

    Raffaele Filieri;Elisabetta Raguseo;Claudio Vitari

  • Structural social capital evolution and knowledge transfer: Evidence from an Irish pharmaceutical network

    Raffaele Filieri;Regina C. McNally;Michele O'Dwyer;Lisa O'Malley

  • The role of aesthetic, cultural, utilitarian and branding factors in young Chinese consumers' repurchase intention of smartphone brands

    Raffaele Filieri;Zhibin Lin

  • What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics

    Raffaele Filieri;Elisabetta Raguseo;Claudio Vitari

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Gorton
Matthew Gorton Newcastle University
Yichuan Wang
Yichuan Wang University of Sheffield
Ye Chen
Ye Chen Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Faizan Ali
Faizan Ali University of Galway
Marcello M. Mariani
Marcello M. Mariani University of Bologna
Jennifer Rowley
Jennifer Rowley Manchester Metropolitan University
Heikki Karjaluoto
Heikki Karjaluoto University of Jyväskylä
Charles F. Hofacker
Charles F. Hofacker Florida State University
Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman
Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for skilled business professionals grows, online study options have become more accessible and affordable than ever. Many students are now pursuing affordable masters programs in business and management to boost their career prospects while managing their personal and professional commitments.

Specialized programs like data science online degrees are also highly sought after, blending business acumen with analytical expertise. These skills are increasingly essential in today’s data-driven organizations.

For those interested in advanced leadership roles, a doctorate organizational leadership opens doors to executive and academic opportunities. This path is ideal for professionals aiming to shape organizational strategy at the highest levels.

When exploring your education, it’s crucial to consider accredited institutions. Many of the online college programs available today meet rigorous quality standards and provide recognized qualifications, making online learning a viable pathway for a successful business or management career.

Best Scientists Citing Raffaele Filieri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles