World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4510 4170 185 173 153 6016

Emely de Vet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emely de Vet between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emely de Vet published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 22 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emely de Vet: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 1
2011 4
2012 5
2013 15
2014 12
2015 17
2016 4
2017 11
2018 4
2019 9
2020 13
2021 21
2022 14
2023 18
2024 14
2025 8
Total 188
Download as CSV

Emely de Vet publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emely de Vet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 153
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Emely de Vet D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emely de Vet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Emely de Vet is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including psychology and health professions, with a focus on behavioral health, diet, and public health.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Within these fields, subfields prominently addressed are general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, clinical psychology, and food science.

Their research topics reflect this diversity and include:

  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability

Their publication record features frequent contributions to several journals, such as:

  • Appetite
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • Scientific Reports
  • Food Quality and Preference

Among recent research papers, notable works include:

  • "Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands" (2020), published in Appetite
  • "Neighbourhood fast food exposure and consumption: the mediating role of neighbourhood social norms" (2020), published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review" (2020), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "The Effects of Nudges: One-Shot Only? Exploring the Temporal Spillover Effects of a Default Nudge" (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Increasing the Proportion of Plant-Based Foods Available to Shift Social Consumption Norms and Food Choice among Non-Vegetarians" (2020), published in Sustainability

Emely de Vet has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Annemien Haveman-Nies
  • Maartje P. Poelman
  • Janine Benjamins
  • Jantien van Berkel
  • Ellen van Kleef

Best Publications

  • Environmental correlates of physical activity and dietary behaviours among young people: a systematic review of reviews.

    E. de Vet;D. T. D. de Ridder;J. B. F. de Wit;J. B. F. de Wit

  • Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents

    F. Marijn Stok;Denise T. D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet;John B. F. de Wit

  • Predicting Fruit Consumption: Cognitions, Intention, and Habits

    Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug;Emely de Vet;Jascha de Nooijer;Bas Verplanken

  • Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands.

    Maartje P. Poelman;Marleen Gillebaart;Caroline Schlinkert;S. Coosje Dijkstra

  • Does habit strength moderate the intention–behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption

    Gert-Jan De Bruijn;Stef P. J. Kremers;EmEly De Vet;Jascha De Nooijer

  • Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study

    Emely De Vet;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug;Jascha De Nooijer;Arie Dijkstra

  • Health on Impulse : When Low Self-Control Promotes Healthy Food Choices

    Stefanie J. Salmon;Bob M. Fennis;Denise T. D. de Ridder;Marieke A. Adriaanse

  • The potential of peer social norms to shape food intake in adolescents and young adults : a systematic review of effects and moderators

    F Marijn Stok;Emely de Vet;Denise T D de Ridder;John B F de Wit

  • Eating by Example: Effects of Environmental Cues on Dietary Decisions

    Sosja Prinsen;Denise T.D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet

  • Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption.

    Josje Maas;Denise T.D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet;John B.F. de Wit

  • More or better: Do the number and specificity of implementation intentions matter in increasing physical activity?

    Emely de Vet;Emely de Vet;Anke Oenema;Johannes Brug

  • Minority talks: The influence of descriptive social norms on fruit intake

    F Marijn Stok;Denise T D de Ridder;Emely de Vet;John B F de Wit

  • Developing Embodied Conversational Agents for Coaching People in a Healthy Lifestyle: Scoping Review.

    Lean L Kramer;Silke Ter Stal;Bob C Mulder;Emely de Vet

  • Should implementation intentions interventions be implemented in obesity prevention: the impact of if-then plans on daily physical activity in Dutch adults.

    Emely De Vet;Emely De Vet;Anke Oenema;Paschal Sheeran;Johannes Brug

  • How norms work: self-identification, attitude, and self-efficacy mediate the relation between descriptive social norms and vegetable intake.

    F. Marijn Stok;Kirsten T. Verkooijen;Denise T.D. de Ridder;John B.F. de Wit

  • Social proof in the supermarket: Promoting healthy choices under low self-control conditions

    Stefanie J. Salmon;Emely De Vet;Marieke A. Adriaanse;Bob M. Fennis

  • Do implementation intentions help to turn good intentions into higher fruit intakes

    Jascha de Nooijer;Emely de Vet;Johannes Brug;Nanne K. de Vries

  • Identifying the ‘if’ for ‘if-then’ plans: Combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour

    Aukje A. C. Verhoeven;Marieke A. Adriaanse;Emely de Vet;Bob M. Fennis

  • How autonomy is understood in discussions on the ethics of nudging

    Anastasia Vugts;Mariëtte Van Den Hoven;Emely De Vet;Marcel Verweij

  • The Transtheoretical model for fruit, vegetable and fish consumption: associations between intakes, stages of change and stage transition determinants

    Emely De Vet;Emely De Vet;Jascha de Nooijer;Nanne K de Vries;Johannes Brug

  • Less is more: The effect of multiple implementation intentions targeting unhealthy snacking habits

    Aukje A. C. Verhoeven;Marieke A. Adriaanse;Denise T. D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Jacob C. Seidell
Jacob C. Seidell Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marieke A. Adriaanse
Marieke A. Adriaanse Utrecht University
Nanne K. de Vries
Nanne K. de Vries Maastricht University
Bob M. Fennis
Bob M. Fennis University of Groningen
Aleksandra Luszczynska
Aleksandra Luszczynska University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Marcel Zeelenberg
Marcel Zeelenberg Tilburg University
Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis
Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to diverse career opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students are attracted to accelerated online degree programs, which allow you to earn your bachelor’s degree at a faster pace—ideal for those eager to join the workforce or advance stategically in their current roles.

For those seeking advanced expertise, a masters degree online offers specializations ranging from sociology to political science. These programs not only provide academic depth, but also critical analytical and research skills.

If your interests span psychology, completing a master in psychology online can lead to roles in counseling, organizational development, or even clinical research. Alternatively, education professionals can pursue leadership positions in schools or organizations by enrolling in one of the online edd programs designed for academic and administrative advancement.

Whether you choose a fast-track bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral pathway, online learning in Social Sciences and Humanities offers the flexibility to shape your education—and career—to your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Emely de Vet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles