World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis

Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4456 4118 183 172 125 7197

Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2010. 6 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2010. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1996 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 7
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 11
2010 22
2011 10
2012 9
2013 6
2014 6
2015 7
2016 3
2017 5
2018 6
2019 6
2020 8
2021 7
2022 10
2023 5
2024 3
2025 3
Total 148
Download as CSV

Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 125 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 125
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research work largely focuses on public health with an emphasis on diet, physical activity, and behavioral health interventions. Their publication record spans multiple disciplines within health professions and medicine, particularly addressing public health, environmental and occupational health, and organizational behavior.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the following research topics:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

They have published in prominent venues, notably:

  • BMC Public Health (4 publications)
  • Public Health Nutrition (3 publications)
  • European Journal of Public Health (3 publications)
  • Frontiers in Public Health (3 publications)
  • Psychology and Health (2 publications)

Steenhuis has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Maartje M. van Stralen (15 joint works)
  • Carry M. Renders (14 joint works)
  • Willemieke Kroeze (9 joint works)
  • Michelle Eykelenboom (9 joint works)
  • Margreet R. Olthof (9 joint works)

Their selected recent papers illustrate their focus on policy, dietary behaviors, and public acceptability of health interventions:

  • Advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting on dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Europe: The Policy Evaluation Network promoting a multidisciplinary approach (2020, Food Policy)
  • Food and health promotion literacy among employees with a low and medium level of education in the Netherlands (2021, BMC Public Health)
  • Predictors of lapse and relapse in physical activity and dietary behaviour: a systematic search and review on prospective studies (2021, Psychology and Health)
  • Public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and its associated factors in the Netherlands (2020, Public Health Nutrition)
  • Less meat in the shopping basket. The effect on meat purchases of higher prices, an information nudge and the combination: a randomised controlled trial (2022, BMC Public Health)

Steenhuis's academic contributions highlight a multidisciplinary approach that bridges public health policy, behavioral science, and health promotion. Their work addresses both theoretical and practical aspects of influencing health-related behavior and public health outcomes within European contexts.

Best Publications

  • The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention.

    Johannes Brug;Ingrid Steenhuis;Patricia van Assema;Hein de Vries

  • Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate

    Michiel R de Boer;Wilma E Waterlander;Lothar D J Kuijper;Ingrid H M Steenhuis

  • Portion size: review and framework for interventions

    Ingrid Hm Steenhuis;Willemijn M Vermeer

  • Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis

    Ellis L Vyth;Ingrid Hm Steenhuis;Annet Jc Roodenburg;Johannes Brug

  • Determinants of weight loss maintenance : a systematic review

    R. D. M. Varkevisser;M. M. van Stralen;W. Kroeze;J. C. F. Ket

  • A short dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents

    Patricia Van Assema;Johannes Brug;Gaby Ronda;Ingrid Steenhuis

  • Consumer food choices: The role of price and pricing strategies.

    Ingrid H.M. Steenhuis;Wilma E. Waterlander;Anika de Mul

  • Ultra-processed foods have the worst nutrient profile, yet they are the most available packaged products in a sample of New Zealand supermarkets

    Claire M Luiten;Ingrid Hm Steenhuis;Helen Eyles;Cliona Ni Mhurchu

  • The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake

    P.T. van Assema;J. Brug;G.M. Ronda;I.H.M. Steenhuis

  • Price discounts significantly enhance fruit and vegetable purchases when combined with nutrition education: a randomized controlled supermarket trial

    Wilma E. Waterlander;Michiel R. de Boer;Albertine J. Schuit;Jacob C. Seidell

  • Actual use of a front-of pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers' motives in food choice.

    Ellis L Vyth;Ingrid H M Steenhuis;Jessica A Vlot;Anouk Wulp

  • Definitions of Long-Term Weight Regain and Their Associations with Clinical Outcomes

    Vera Voorwinde;Ingrid H M Steenhuis;Ignace M C Janssen;Valerie M Monpellier

  • A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands

    Ellis L Vyth;Ingrid H M Steenhuis;Sanne F Mallant;Zinzi L Mol

  • Influence of placement of a nutrition logo on cafeteria menu items on lunchtime food Choices at Dutch work sites.

    Ellis L. Vyth;Ingrid H.M. Steenhuis;Martijn W. Heymans;Annet J.C. Roodenburg

  • Using a 3D Virtual Supermarket to Measure Food Purchase Behavior: A Validation Study

    Wilma Elzeline Waterlander;Yannan Jiang;Ingrid Hendrika Margaretha Steenhuis;Cliona Ni Mhurchu

  • Portion size: latest developments and interventions

    I. Steenhuis;M. Poelman

  • Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: A mixed-method systematic review and meta-Analysis

    Michelle Eykelenboom;Maartje M. van Stralen;Margreet R. Olthof;Linda J. Schoonmade

  • Energy density, energy costs and income - how are they related?

    Wilma E Waterlander;Wendy E de Haas;Inge van Amstel;Albertine J Schuit

  • Patient aggression in clinical psychiatry: perceptions of mental health nurses

    E. J. Jonker;P. J. J. Goossens;I. H. M. Steenhuis;N. E. Oud

  • Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size

    Willemijn M. Vermeer;Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis;Jacob C. Seidell

  • Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions

    J. Brug;I.H.M. Steenhuis;P.T. van Assema;K. Glanz

  • Small, medium, large or supersize: trends in food portion sizes in The Netherlands.

    Ingrid H M Steenhuis;Franca H Leeuwis;Willemijn M Vermeer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacob C. Seidell
Jacob C. Seidell Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University
Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet Wageningen University & Research
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Cliona Ni Mhurchu University of Auckland
Birgit Mayer
Birgit Mayer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gerjo Kok
Gerjo Kok Maastricht University
Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has opened new pathways for students pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA. Popular options include earning a masters degree online, which provides the flexibility to advance your career while balancing personal commitments. These programs are recognized for their convenience and credibility.

Those eager to start their professional journey sooner may consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online. These fast-track programs compress coursework, allowing motivated learners to graduate faster and enter the workforce or graduate studies earlier.

Specialty fields like social work and behavior analysis are also well-supported by online study. For example, online msw programs make it possible to gain the credentials needed for clinical roles and advocacy positions. Additionally, pursuing one of the many bcba masters programs online can lead to fulfilling careers in behavioral therapy and educational settings.

Whether you seek rapid advancement, affordable specialization, or flexible learning, these online programs offer a diverse range of options to support your academic and professional goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Ingrid H. M. Steenhuis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles