World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
90
Citations
31655
World Ranking
88
National Ranking
42

Brian Wansink publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Wansink sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 488 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Brian Wansink D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Wansink sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award

Overview

Brian Wansink is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and psychology, with a significant focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and music.

Their work extensively covers topics related to obesity, physical activity, and diet, as well as consumer attitudes and food labeling. Additional subjects of research include eating disorders and behaviors, sensory analysis and statistical methods, nutritional studies and diet, humor studies and applications, and empathy and medical education.

Brian Wansink has authored several recent papers, including:

  • MyPlate, Half-Plate, and No Plate: How Visual Plate-Related Dietary Benchmarks Influence What Food People Serve (2022, Cureus)
  • MyPlate, Half-Plate, and No Plate: How Visual Plate-related Dietary Benchmarks Influence Meal Composition (2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Body Shaming vs. Body Positivity: Exploring What Words Hurt and What Words Heal (2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • MyPlate, Half-Plate, and No Plate: How Visual Plate-related Dietary Benchmarks Influence What People Serve (2021, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • Parental actions that correlate with preschoolers requesting larger portions of food when away from home (2022, International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), SSRN Electronic Journal, Cureus, International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, and Med Discoveries.

Collaborations often occur with coauthors including Audrey Wansink, Valerie Wansink, and Loren Cherry.

Best Publications

  • A BENEFIT CONGRUENCY FRAMEWORK OF SALES PROMOTION EFFECTIVENESS

    Pierre Chandon;Brian Wansink;Gilles Laurent

  • Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design -- For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires

    Norman M. Bradburn;Seymour Sudman;Brian Wansink

  • Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers.

    Brian Wansink

  • Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think

    Brian Wansink

  • The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions

    Pierre Chandon;Brian Wansink

  • Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture

    Eric J. Johnson;Suzanne B. Shu;Benedict G. C. Dellaert;Craig Fox

  • Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity?:

    Brian Wansink;Pierre Chandon

  • Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook.

    Brian Wansink;Jeffery Sobal

  • The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities

    Barbara E. Kahn;Brian Wansink

  • Bottomless Bowls: Why Visual Cues of Portion Size May Influence Intake

    Brian Wansink;James E. Painter;Jill North

  • Exploring comfort food preferences across age and gender.

    Brian Wansink;Matthew M. Cheney;Nina Chan

  • The Variety of an Assortment

    Stephen J. Hoch;Eric T. Bradlow;Brian Wansink

  • An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions

    Brian Wansink;Robert J. Kent;Stephen J. Hoch

  • Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume

    Brian Wansink

  • Does food marketing need to make us fat? a review and solutions

    Pierre Chandon;Brian Wansink

  • Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste.

    Brian Wansink;Junyong Kim

  • The Influence of Incidental Affect on Consumers’ Food Intake:

    Nitika Garg;Brian Wansink;J. Jeffrey Inman

  • Is Meat Male? A Quantitative Multimethod Framework to Establish Metaphoric Relationships

    Paul Rozin;Julia M. Hormes;Myles S. Faith;Brian Wansink

  • A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease

    Joost M.E. Pennings;Joost M.E. Pennings;Brian Wansink;Brian Wansink;Matthew T.G. Meulenberg

  • Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes.

    Brian Wansink;Koert van Ittersum;James E. Painter

  • You taste what you see: Do organic labels bias taste perceptions?

    Wan-chen Jenny Lee;Mitsuru Shimizu;Kevin M. Kniffin;Brian Wansink

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Just
David R. Just Cornell University
Joost M.E. Pennings
Joost M.E. Pennings Maastricht University
William D. Schulze
William D. Schulze Cornell University
Jeffery Sobal
Jeffery Sobal Cornell University
Barbara E. Kahn
Barbara E. Kahn University of Pennsylvania
Paul Rozin
Paul Rozin University of Pennsylvania
Carol M. Devine
Carol M. Devine Cornell University
Elaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington Cornell University
Harry M. Kaiser
Harry M. Kaiser Cornell University
Peter M. Todd
Peter M. Todd Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized online degree options and evolving career paths. If you’re interested in leadership roles, consider organizational leadership doctoral programs. These advanced degrees can help you qualify for executive management positions in both corporate and nonprofit sectors.

It’s crucial to select accredited online degree programs to ensure your qualification is recognized and respected by employers. Accreditation affects both the quality of education and future job prospects, so always verify before enrolling.

For those interested in industry-specific management roles, online options like a online construction management degree can prepare you for fast-paced roles in the construction sector. Similarly, a healthcare administration degree online accredited is ideal if you’re seeking a leadership position in the growing healthcare industry.

Exploring these online programs can make your path to a management career more flexible and tailored to your professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Wansink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles