What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Sedimentary rock
- Paleontology
- Basalt
His main research concerns Metamorphism, Geochemistry, Gneiss, Subduction and Geochronology.
He has researched Metamorphism in several fields, including Metamorphic rock, Cretaceous and Zircon.
Geochemistry is frequently linked to Eclogite in his study.
His study explores the link between Gneiss and topics such as Titanite that cross with problems in Lithosphere, Igneous rock and Cenozoic.
His Subduction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Continental margin, Earth science and Terrane.
His Geochronology study which covers Mineralogy that intersects with Radiogenic nuclide.
His most cited work include:
- Laser-ablation split-stream ICP petrochronology (265 citations)
- High-Temperature Deformation During Continental-Margin Subduction & Exhumation: The Ultrahigh-Pressure Western Gneiss Region of Norway (171 citations)
- Campaign-style titanite U–Pb dating by laser-ablation ICP: Implications for crustal flow, phase transformations and titanite closure (133 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark mainly investigates Geochemistry, Zircon, Metamorphism, Metamorphic rock and Geochronology.
His Geochemistry research incorporates elements of Eclogite and Terrane.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Crust, Provenance, Forearc, Mineralogy and Archean in addition to Zircon.
His Metamorphism research includes themes of Trace element, Granulite, Metamorphic facies and Continental crust.
His Geochronology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Orogeny, Radiogenic nuclide and Cretaceous.
His studies examine the connections between Gneiss and genetics, as well as such issues in Subduction, with regards to Continental margin.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (68.51%)
- Zircon (32.60%)
- Metamorphism (30.94%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Geochemistry (68.51%)
- Zircon (32.60%)
- Metamorphism (30.94%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark mainly investigates Geochemistry, Zircon, Metamorphism, Geochronology and Monazite.
He usually deals with Geochemistry and limits it to topics linked to Granulite and Continental crust.
His work deals with themes such as Orogeny, Forearc, Eclogite and Archean, which intersect with Zircon.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nappe and Massif.
His Geochronology research integrates issues from Diagenesis and Cretaceous.
His Monazite research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Gneiss and Titanite.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Decoupled U-Pb date and chemical zonation of monazite in migmatites: The case for disturbance of isotopic systematics by coupled dissolution-reprecipitation (10 citations)
- The use of ASH-15 flowstone as a matrix-matched reference material for laser-ablation U?????????Pb geochronology of calcite (4 citations)
- Decoupling of zircon U–Pb and trace-element systematics driven by U diffusion in eclogite-facies zircon (Monviso meta-ophiolite, W. Alps) (4 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Sedimentary rock
- Basalt
- Paleontology
Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark spends much of his time researching Geochemistry, Metamorphic rock, Calcite, Metamorphism and Zircon.
The concepts of his Geochemistry study are interwoven with issues in Granulite and Terrane.
In his study, Wadi, Subduction, Igneous rock and Metamorphic facies is inextricably linked to Ophiolite, which falls within the broad field of Metamorphic rock.
His Calcite research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Absolute dating, Petrology and Plate tectonics.
His Metamorphism research integrates issues from Massif, Dome and Nappe.
His work in Zircon tackles topics such as Migmatite which are related to areas like Eclogite, Protolith, Gondwana, Anatexis and Radiogenic nuclide.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
