World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 50 3425 3136 1363 1213 250 8771

John M. Cottle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John M. Cottle between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John M. Cottle published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2019. 38 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 18 publications
2005 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John M. Cottle: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 10
2009 6
2010 5
2011 8
2012 9
2013 10
2014 13
2015 17
2016 21
2017 23
2018 19
2019 29
2020 21
2021 23
2022 14
2023 22
2024 20
2025 18
Total 297
Download as CSV

John M. Cottle publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Cottle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 250 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208 250
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

John M. Cottle D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Cottle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183 50
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

John M. Cottle is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their primary field of study is Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on Geophysics. Additional subfields include Artificial Intelligence, Atmospheric Science, Geology, and Paleontology.

The scientist's research encompasses a diverse range of topics related to Earth's geological processes. Major topics include Geological and Geochemical Analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide, and Geological Studies and Exploration.

John M. Cottle's recent scholarly output features several papers published from 2020 to 2022 across reputable scientific journals. Key recent publications include:

  • Erupted zircon record of continental crust formation during mantle driven arc flare-ups, 2020, Geology
  • Transpressive Deformation in the Southern European Variscan Belt: New Insights From the Aiguilles Rouges Massif (Western Alps), 2020, Tectonics
  • Timescales of subduction initiation and evolution of subduction thermal regimes, 2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Apatites for destruction: Reference apatites from Morocco and Brazil for U-Pb petrochronology and Nd and Sr isotope geochemistry, 2021, Chemical Geology
  • How Himalayan collision stems from subduction, 2021, Geology

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborations within their research network and include Kyle P. Larson, Andrew Kylander-Clark, Francisco E. Apen, Sudip Shrestha, and Shahrouz Babazadeh.

John M. Cottle has published extensively in a number of scientific venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America (19 publications)
  • Geology (6 publications)
  • Chemical Geology (5 publications)
  • Journal of the Geological Society (5 publications)
  • Tectonics (4 publications)

In recognition of their work, John M. Cottle was awarded the Hellman Fellow distinction in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Laser-ablation split-stream ICP petrochronology

    Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark;Bradley R. Hacker;John M. Cottle

  • Tectonic evolution of the Mogok metamorphic belt, Burma (Myanmar) constrained by U-Th-Pb dating of metamorphic and magmatic rocks

    M. P. Searle;S. R. Noble;J. M. Cottle;D. J. Waters

  • Defining the Himalayan Main Central Thrust in Nepal

    Michael P. Searle;Richard D. Law;Laurent Godin;Kyle P. Larson

  • Campaign-style titanite U–Pb dating by laser-ablation ICP: Implications for crustal flow, phase transformations and titanite closure

    K.J. Spencer;B.R. Hacker;A.R.C. Kylander-Clark;T.B. Andersen

  • Crustal melt granites and migmatites along the Himalaya: melt source, segregation, transport and granite emplacement mechanisms

    M. P. Searle;J. M. Cottle;M. J. Streule;D. J. Waters

  • Timing of midcrustal metamorphism, melting and deformation in the Mount Everest Region of Southern Tibet revealed by U(Th)-Pb geochronology

    John M. Cottle;Michael P. Searle;Matthew S. A. Horstwood;David J. Waters

  • Geochronology of granulitized eclogite from the Ama Drime Massif: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the South Tibetan Himalaya

    John M. Cottle;John M. Cottle;Micah J. Jessup;Micah J. Jessup;Dennis L. Newell;Matthew S. A. Horstwood

  • Magma emplacement, differentiation and cooling in the middle crust: Integrated zircon geochronological–geochemical constraints from the Bergell Intrusion, Central Alps

    Kyle M. Samperton;Blair Schoene;John M. Cottle;C. Brenhin Keller

  • Cenozoic deep crust in the Pamir

    Jennifer Schmidt;Bradley R. Hacker;Lothar Ratschbacher;Konstanze Stübner

  • Structural insights into the early stages of exhumation along an orogen-scale detachment: The South Tibetan Detachment System, Dzakaa Chu section, Eastern Himalaya

    John M. Cottle;Micah J. Jessup;Dennis L. Newell;Michael P. Searle

  • How does the mid-crust accommodate deformation in large, hot collisional orogens? A review of recent research in the Himalayan orogen

    John M. Cottle;Kyle P. Larson;Dawn A. Kellett

  • Orogen-parallel extension and exhumation enhanced by denudation in the trans-Himalayan Arun River gorge, Ama Drime Massif, Tibet-Nepal

    Micah J. Jessup;Dennis L. Newell;John M. Cottle;Aaron L. Berger

  • Metamorphic history of a syn-convergent orogen-parallel detachment: The South Tibetan detachment system, Bhutan Himalaya

    D. A. Kellett;D. Grujic;C. Warren;J. Cottle

  • The South Tibetan detachment system facilitates ultra rapid cooling of granulite-facies rocks in Sikkim Himalaya

    Dawn A. Kellett;Djordje Grujic;Isabelle Coutand;John Cottle

  • P-T-t-Dpaths of Everest Series schist, Nepal

    M. J. Jessup;J. M. Cottle;M. P. Searle;R. D. Law

  • A new approach to single shot laser ablation analysis and its application to in situ Pb/U geochronology

    John Cottle;John Cottle;Matthew Horstwood;Randall R Parrish

  • Probing the depths of the India‐Asia collision: U‐Th‐Pb monazite chronology of granulites from NW Bhutan

    C. J. Warren;D. Grujic;D. A. Kellett;D. A. Kellett;J. Cottle;J. Cottle

  • Telescoping of isotherms beneath the South Tibetan Detachment System, Mount Everest Massif

    R.D. Law;M.J. Jessup;M.P. Searle;M.K. Francsis

  • U–Th/Pb geochronology of detrital zircon and monazite by single shot laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SS-LA-ICPMS)

    John M. Cottle;Andrew R. Kylander-Clark;Johannes C. Vrijmoed

  • Reconciling Himalayan midcrustal discontinuities: The Main Central thrust system

    Kyle P. Larson;Tyler K. Ambrose;Tyler K. Ambrose;A. Alexander G. Webb;John M. Cottle

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark
Andrew R.C. Kylander-Clark University of California, Santa Barbara
Laurent Godin
Laurent Godin Queen's University
Michael P. Searle
Michael P. Searle University of Oxford
Richard D. Law
Richard D. Law Virginia Tech
Blair Schoene
Blair Schoene Princeton University
Matthew S.A. Horstwood
Matthew S.A. Horstwood British Geological Survey
Djordje Grujic
Djordje Grujic Dalhousie University
Manfred R. Strecker
Manfred R. Strecker University of Potsdam
David J. Waters
David J. Waters University of Oxford
Bradley R. Hacker
Bradley R. Hacker University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens up a variety of career paths that often intersect with other fields. For students interested in expanding their skillset, pursuing complementary online degrees can be highly beneficial. For instance, language skills are crucial in global scientific collaboration, making a cheapest online spanish degree a practical option to consider.

Veterans seeking to transition into Earth Science or related fields can find tailored educational opportunities. Many institutions offer programs suited to their needs, such as the best online spanish degree programs for veterans, providing flexibility and support for military backgrounds.

Creative professionals interested in environmental or geological themes might look into interdisciplinary programs like the best online mfa programs. These degrees can enrich communication skills essential for public outreach and education in Earth Science careers.

Management roles within environmental organizations often require expertise beyond science. An online masters degree in human resource management offers valuable leadership skills to effectively manage teams and projects in this sector.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Cottle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles