World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
54
Citations
8328
World Ranking
2766
National Ranking
312

Nick M.W. Roberts publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick M.W. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 183 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Nick M.W. Roberts D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick M.W. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick M.W. Roberts is affiliated with the British Geological Survey in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on geophysics, artificial intelligence applications, atmospheric science, paleontology, and geochemistry and petrology. Their research spans multiple interrelated disciplines and integrates geological and geochemical analysis with earthquake and tectonic studies as well as geologic mapping and paleoclimatology.

The scientist has authored and co-authored various papers, some of which include:

  • Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U-Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations, 2020, Geochronology
  • Timescales of faulting through calcite geochronology: A review, 2022, Journal of Structural Geology

Nick M.W. Roberts has worked alongside several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Christopher J. Spencer
  • Kent C. Condie
  • Henrik Drake
  • Stephen J. Puetz
  • Thomas N. Lamont

Their publication record reflects a diverse engagement with reputed scientific venues. Notable journals and publication platforms where their work appears include:

  • Precambrian Research
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Chemical Geology
  • Geoscience Frontiers
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

The main research themes addressed by Nick M.W. Roberts involve a combination of geological and geochemical analysis techniques applied to a range of topics, such as:

  • Geological and geochemical analysis
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Geochemistry and geologic mapping
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research
  • Paleontology and stratigraphy of fossils
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

Roberts' work on geochronology includes significant contributions to understanding faulting timescales and advancements in analytical techniques such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. This research addresses both methodological strategies and the application of advanced geochemical tools to carbonate minerals.

Best Publications

  • A calcite reference material for LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology

    Nick M. W. Roberts;E. Troy Rasbury;Randall R. Parrish;Christopher J. Smith

  • The zircon archive of continent formation through time

    Nick M. W. Roberts;Christopher J. Spencer

  • U-Pb geochronology of calcite-mineralized faults: Absolute timing of rift-related fault events on the northeast Atlantic margin

    Nick M.W. Roberts;Richard J. Walker

  • Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations

    Nick M. W. Roberts;Kerstin Drost;Matthew S. A. Horstwood;Daniel J. Condon

  • The identification and significance of pure sediment-derived granites

    Thomas N. Hopkinson;Nigel B.W. Harris;Clare J. Warren;Christopher J. Spencer

  • The boring billion? – Lid tectonics, continental growth and environmental change associated with the Columbia supercontinent

    Nick M.W. Roberts

  • Growth, destruction, and preservation of Earth's continental crust

    Christopher Spencer;N. Roberts;M. Santosh;M. Santosh;M. Santosh

  • Developing an inverted Barrovian sequence; insights from monazite petrochronology

    Catherine M. Mottram;Clare J. Warren;Daniele Regis;Nick M.W. Roberts

  • Early hydrothermal carbon uptake by the upper oceanic crust: insight from in situ U-Pb dating

    Laurence A. Coogan;Randall R. Parrish;Nick M.W. Roberts

  • Generation and preservation of continental crust in the Grenville Orogeny

    Christopher J. Spencer;Peter A. Cawood;Chris J. Hawkesworth;Anthony R. Prave

  • Strategies towards robust interpretations of in situ zircon Lu–Hf isotope analyses

    C.J. Spencer;C.J. Spencer;C.L. Kirkland;N.M.W. Roberts;N.J. Evans

  • Proterozoic onset of crustal reworking and collisional tectonics: Reappraisal of the zircon oxygen isotope record

    Christopher J. Spencer;Peter A. Cawood;Chris J. Hawkesworth;Timothy D. Raub

  • A non‐collisional, accretionary Sveconorwegian orogen

    Trond Slagstad;Nick M. W. Roberts;Nick M. W. Roberts;Mogens Marker;Torkil S. Røhr

  • Petrogenesis of rare-metal pegmatites in high-grade metamorphic terranes: A case study from the Lewisian Gneiss Complex of north-west Scotland

    R.A. Shaw;K.M. Goodenough;N.M.W. Roberts;M.S.A. Horstwood

  • A geochronological and petrological study of anatectic paragneiss and associated granite dykes from the Day Nui Con Voi metamorphic core complex, North Vietnam: constraints on the timing of metamorphism within the Red River shear zone

    R. M. Palin;M. P. Searle;D. J. Waters;R. R. Parrish

  • Increased loss of continental crust during supercontinent amalgamation

    Nick M.W. Roberts;Nick M.W. Roberts

  • The use of ASH-15 flowstone as a matrix-matched reference material for laser-ablation U?????????Pb geochronology of calcite

    Perach Nuriel;Jörn-Frederik Wotzlaw;Maria Ovtcharova;Anton Vaks

  • Continental growth and reworking on the edge of the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinents; 1.86–0.9 Ga accretionary orogeny in southwest Fennoscandia

    Nick M.W. Roberts;Trond Slagstad

  • Contrasting granite metallogeny through the zircon record : a case study from Myanmar

    Nicholas J. Gardiner;Nicholas J. Gardiner;Chris J. Hawkesworth;Laurence J. Robb;Martin J. Whitehouse

  • The tectonic and metallogenic framework of Myanmar: A Tethyan mineral system

    Nicholas J. Gardiner;Laurence J. Robb;Christopher K. Morley;Michael P. Searle

  • Sedimentary recycling in arc magmas: geochemical and U–Pb–Hf–O constraints on the Mesoproterozoic Suldal Arc, SW Norway

    Nick M. W. Roberts;Nick M. W. Roberts;Trond Slagstad;Randall R. Parrish;Randall R. Parrish;Michael J. Norry

  • Rapid thermal rejuvenation of high-crystallinity magma linked to porphyry copper deposit formation; evidence from the Koloula Porphyry Prospect, Solomon Islands

    S. Tapster;S. Tapster;D. J. Condon;J. Naden;S. R. Noble

  • Continent formation through time

    Nick M. W. Roberts;Martin J. Van Kranendonk;Stephen Parman;Peter D. Clift

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Spencer
Christopher J. Spencer Queen's University
Matthew S.A. Horstwood
Matthew S.A. Horstwood British Geological Survey
Randall R. Parrish
Randall R. Parrish University of Portsmouth
Clare J. Warren
Clare J. Warren The Open University
Michael P. Searle
Michael P. Searle University of Oxford
Martin J. Whitehouse
Martin J. Whitehouse Swedish Museum of Natural History
Christopher L. Kirkland
Christopher L. Kirkland Curtin University
M. Santosh
M. Santosh China University of Geosciences
Peter A. Cawood
Peter A. Cawood Monash University
Robert J. Thomas
Robert J. Thomas Council for Geoscience

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various educational opportunities and career pathways. Many students seek affordable and flexible options, similar to other fields like digital photography or language studies. Programs such as the cheapest online photography degree demonstrate how online education can make specialized skills more accessible. For veterans, who often benefit from tailored learning options, degrees like the photography degree online for veterans show the importance of veteran-friendly online platforms.

Similarly, language acquisition degrees, such as an online degree in Spanish, highlight cost-effective routes to gain valuable communication skills that enhance career prospects. Programs like the best online Spanish degree programs for veterans further underscore the significance of supportive, specialized education for those transitioning from military to civilian careers.

By drawing from diverse online degree programs, Earth Science students can find flexible, affordable paths that fit their unique needs and career ambitions. Understanding options in related fields helps emphasize how online education continues to evolve and provide accessible opportunities for all learners.

Best Scientists Citing Nick M.W. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles