World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5910
World Ranking
9487
National Ranking
5027

I. M. Jawahar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. M. Jawahar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

I. M. Jawahar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. M. Jawahar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

I. M. Jawahar is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of business, management, psychology, and social sciences, with a notable emphasis on organizational behavior and human resource management. Jawahar's scholarly contributions span multiple subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, gender studies, and sociology and political science.

The scientist has authored numerous papers that explore topics such as job satisfaction, organizational behavior, gender diversity and inequality, personality traits, workaholism, burnout, well-being, employer branding, e-human resource management, and entrepreneurship studies. These thematic areas demonstrate a consistent interest in workplace dynamics and employee-related phenomena across diverse organizational contexts.

Recent publications by I. M. Jawahar include:

  • "Does organizational cronyism undermine social capital? Testing the mediating role of workplace ostracism and the moderating role of workplace incivility" (2021) in Career Development International
  • "Development and Validation of a Career Sustainability Scale" (2021) in Journal of Career Development
  • "Perceived overqualification and counterproductive work behavior: testing the mediating role of relative deprivation and the moderating role of ambition" (2020) in Personnel Review
  • "Manager narcissism and employee silence: A socio-analytic theory perspective" (2021) in Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • "Interactive influence of work-life balance benefits, employee recommendation, and job attributes on employer attractiveness and job pursuit intentions: two experiments" (2022) in Asian Business & Management

Frequent collaborators in Jawahar's research include Bert Schreurs, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra, Thomas H. Stone, Gordhan K. Saini, and Mahsa Abedini. This network of coauthors reflects active engagement within a scholarly community focused on organizational studies and related psychological inquiries.

The leading publication venues in which Jawahar has contributed multiple articles comprise:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Career Development International
  • Personnel Review
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Asian Business & Management

The scientist's work includes a significant body of research concerning organizational behavior and human resource management, with 22 publications in this subfield alone. Additionally, the research explores social psychology through 14 publications and touches upon clinical psychology, gender studies, and sociology and political science to a lesser degree.

Throughout their career, I. M. Jawahar has maintained a focus on understanding and interpreting critical workplace issues such as employee silence, overqualification, workplace ostracism, and organizational cronyism, contributing to the broader knowledge base of management sciences and psychological factors influencing work environments.

Best Publications

  • Role conflict and burnout: The direct and moderating effects of political skill and perceived organizational support on burnout dimensions.

    I. M. Jawahar;Thomas H. Stone;Jennifer L. Kisamore

  • WHERE ALL THE CHILDREN ARE ABOVE AVERAGE: THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSE EFFECT

    I. M. Jawahar;Charles R. Williams

  • Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations

    Jennifer L. Kisamore;Thomas H. Stone;I. M. Jawahar

  • Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality

    Thomas H. Stone;I. M. Jawahar;Jennifer L. Kisamore

  • Self-efficacy and political skill as comparative predictors of task and contextual performance: A two-study constructive replication.

    I. M. Jawahar;James A. Meurs;Gerald R. Ferris;Wayne A. Hochwarter

  • The Influence of Perceptions of Fairness on Performance Appraisal Reactions

    I. M. Jawahar

  • Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback

    I. M. Jawahar

  • Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct

    Thomas H. Stone;I.M. Jawahar;Jennifer L. Kisamore

  • Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader‐member exchange

    I.M. Jawahar;Dean Carr

  • A Model of Organizational Justice and Workplace Aggression

    I. M. Jawahar

  • Perceived organizational support for women's advancement and turnover intentions: The mediating role of job and employer satisfaction

    I.M. Jawahar;Pegah Hemmasi

  • Associations among altruism, burnout dimensions, and organizational citizenship behaviour

    Ij. Hetty van Emmerik;I.M. Jawahar;Thomas H. Stone

  • Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.

    I M Jawahar;Jonny Mattsson

  • The Mediating Role of Appraisal Feedback Reactions on the Relationship Between Rater Feedback-Related Behaviors and Ratee Performance

    I.M. Jawahar

  • The route to employability: Examining resources and the mediating role of motivation

    I.J.Hetty Van Emmerik;Bert Herman Schreurs;Nele De Cuyper;I.M. Jawahar

  • An Investigation of Potential Consequences of Satisfaction with Appraisal Feedback

    I.M. Jawahar

  • The Effect of Attitudes, Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy on End User Performance

    I. M. Jawahar;B. Elango

  • Fairness perceptions and satisfaction with components of pay satisfaction

    I.M. Jawahar;Thomas H. Stone

  • Differential Effect of Inter-Role Conflict on Proactive Individual’s Experience of Burnout

    I. M. Jawahar;Jennifer L. Kisamore;Thomas H. Stone;Douglas L. Rahn

  • Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors.

    I. M. Jawahar

  • Supervisor incivility and how it affects subordinates' performance: a matter of trust

    I. M. Jawahar;Bert Schreurs

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric W. Liguori
Eric W. Liguori Florida State University
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Maria C. W. Peeters
Maria C. W. Peeters Utrecht University
Wayne A. Hochwarter
Wayne A. Hochwarter Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of professional pathways, particularly in counseling and therapy roles. Many individuals choose to become licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs), which is a rewarding option for those interested in helping families and couples navigate personal challenges.

If you are considering this career, it’s important to understand that MFT certification requirements differ by location. For example, those researching Sacramento mft certification requirements or Saint Paul mft certification requirements will find that licensure demands specific academic programs, supervised clinical hours, and passing a state-approved exam.

Similarly, if you are interested in how to become an mft in San Antonio or are curious about mft requirements in San Diego, you’ll need to follow the local guidelines and training requirements specific to each city.

Exploring online psychology degrees is a flexible option for students seeking to balance studies with other commitments. These programs are widely accepted and can prepare you for licensure while allowing you to meet clinical practice requirements in your desired region.

Best Scientists Citing I. M. Jawahar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles