World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5486
World Ranking
9861
National Ranking
391

Amin Hammad publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amin Hammad sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amin Hammad D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amin Hammad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amin Hammad is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada and specializes in engineering, with a strong focus on building and construction, as well as civil and structural engineering. Their academic work spans several subfields, including geology, radiological and ultrasound technology, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Their research primarily addresses areas such as infrastructure maintenance and monitoring, BIM (Building Information Modeling) and construction integration, 3D surveying and cultural heritage, occupational health and safety research, underground infrastructure and sustainability, building energy and comfort optimization, and geotechnical engineering and underground structures.

Frequent collaborators in Amin Hammad's research include Faridaddin Vahdatikhaki, Fardin Bahreini, Ali Ghelmani, Tersoo K. Genger, and Yusheng Huang, indicating a consistent partnership pattern with several coauthors over multiple projects.

The scientist has contributed to a number of scholarly venues, with multiple publications in the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Automation in Construction, the Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, and Energy and Buildings.

Selected recent papers authored by Amin Hammad are:

  • LiDAR-equipped UAV path planning considering potential locations of defects for bridge inspection, 2020, Automation in Construction
  • History and recent development of multi-purpose utility tunnels, 2020, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
  • Construction, renovation, and demolition waste in landfill: a review of waste characteristics, environmental impacts, and mitigation measures, 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Parametric modeling and surface-specific sensitivity analysis of PV module layout on building skin using BIM, 2020, Energy and Buildings
  • How to bring UHI to the urban planning table? A data-driven modeling approach, 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society

Best Publications

  • Knowledge-assisted BIM-based visual analytics for failure root cause detection in facilities management

    Ali Motamedi;Amin Hammad;Yoosef Asen

  • Simulation-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of institutional building renovation considering energy consumption, Life-Cycle Cost and Life-Cycle Assessment

    Seyed Amirhosain Sharif;Amin Hammad

  • Automated Code Compliance Checking for Building Envelope Design

    Xiangyang Tan;Amin Hammad;Paul Fazio

  • LiDAR-equipped UAV path planning considering potential locations of defects for bridge inspection

    Neshat Bolourian;Amin Hammad

  • Automated excavators activity recognition and productivity analysis from construction site surveillance videos

    Chen Chen;Zhenhua Zhu;Amin Hammad

  • Developing surrogate ANN for selecting near-optimal building energy renovation methods considering energy consumption, LCC and LCA

    Seyed Amirhosain Sharif;Amin Hammad

  • Predicting movements of onsite workers and mobile equipment for enhancing construction site safety

    Zhenhua Zhu;Man-Woo Park;Christian Koch;Mohamad Soltani

  • Improving lifting motion planning and re-planning of cranes with consideration for safety and efficiency

    Cheng Zhang;Amin Hammad

  • Lifecycle management of facilities components using radio frequency identification and building information model

    Ali Motamedi;Amin Hammad

  • Crane Pose Estimation Using UWB Real-Time Location System

    C. Zhang;A. Hammad;S. Rodriguez

  • Remote interactive collaboration in facilities management using BIM-based mixed reality

    Khaled El Ammari;Amin Hammad

  • Multiobjective Optimization of Bridge Deck Rehabilitation Using a Genetic Algorithm

    Chunlu Liu;Amin Hammad;Yoshito Itoh

  • Framework for near real-time simulation of earthmoving projects using location tracking technologies

    Faridaddin Vahdatikhaki;Amin Hammad

  • Critical review and research roadmap of office building energy management based on occupancy monitoring

    Shide Salimi;Amin Hammad

  • Optimization-based excavator pose estimation using real-time location systems

    Faridaddin Vahdatikhaki;Amin Hammad;Hassaan Siddiqui

  • History and recent development of multi-purpose utility tunnels

    Y. Luo;A. Alaghbandrad;T.K. Genger;A. Hammad

  • Localization of RFID-equipped assets during the operation phase of facilities

    Ali Motamedi;Mohammad Mostafa Soltani;Amin Hammad

  • Multiagent Approach for Real-Time Collision Avoidance and Path Replanning for Cranes

    Cheng Zhang;Amin Hammad

  • Near Real-Time Motion Planning and Simulation of Cranes in Construction: Framework and System Architecture

    Homam AlBahnassi;Amin Hammad

  • Distributed Augmented Reality for Visualizing Collaborative Construction Tasks

    Amin Hammad;Hui Wang;Sudhir P. Mudur

  • Skeleton estimation of excavator by detecting its parts

    Mohammad Mostafa Soltani;Zhenhua Zhu;Amin Hammad

  • Performance analysis of simulation-based optimization of construction projects using High Performance Computing

    Shide Salimi;Mohammed Mawlana;Amin Hammad

Frequent Co-Authors

Tarek Zayed
Tarek Zayed Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Paul Fazio
Paul Fazio Concordia University
James H. Garrett
James H. Garrett Carnegie Mellon University
Mohamed Al-Hussein
Mohamed Al-Hussein University of Alberta
Eric Smaling
Eric Smaling Wageningen University & Research
Roch Glitho
Roch Glitho Concordia University
Mourad Debbabi
Mourad Debbabi Concordia University
Osama Moselhi
Osama Moselhi Concordia University
Ursula Eicker
Ursula Eicker Concordia University
Moayad Aloqaily
Moayad Aloqaily United Arab Emirates University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to closely related disciplines and flexible career options. Students interested in engineering can expand their skills by pursuing the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs. These programs blend practical engineering expertise with a foundational understanding of computer systems, making graduates highly valuable in today’s job market.

For those passionate about scientific analysis and theoretical applications, a bachelor of science in physics online can be an excellent complement to a computer science background. This pairing often leads to specialized tech roles in research or STEM industries.

The demand for data-driven decision making has also risen sharply. If you want to work with big data, modeling, or AI, earning a data scientist degree can put you at the forefront of one of the fastest-growing tech fields.

Additionally, a solid understanding of hardware can be achieved through an electrical engineering degree online admissions pathway. This option is great for students eager to bridge software and hardware innovation.

Best Scientists Citing Amin Hammad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles