World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6345 5897 3049 2782 72 11686

Tim Barnett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tim Barnett between 1970 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tim Barnett published across 50 years, from 1970 to 2019, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1994. 4 of the 73 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1994. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications
1970 2019

73 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tim Barnett: publications per year, 1970 to 2019
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 5
1995 2
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 4
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 3
2011 1
2012 3
2013 5
2014 1
2015 2
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
Total 73
Download as CSV

Tim Barnett publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Barnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 64–73 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 72 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161 72
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Tim Barnett D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Barnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Tim Barnett is affiliated with Mississippi State University in the United States. Their academic focus primarily lies in the field of Computer Science, with specific attention to Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their research work encompasses several important topics within the domain of cybersecurity and network analysis. These include:

  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Tim Barnett collaborates regularly with several researchers, including Kent Marett, with whom they have co-authored multiple publications.

Their contributions are reflected in publications that focus on the intersection of computer networks, security protocols, and the investigation of cybercrime. Their research places an emphasis on both theoretical and practical approaches to detecting network intrusions and enhancing information security systems.

Best Publications

  • Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family‐Centered Non‐Economic Goals in Small Firms

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Allison W. Pearson;Tim Barnett

  • CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN MANAGEMENT, FIRM PERFORMANCE, AND THE MODERATING ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION DIMENSIONS

    Orlando C. Richard;Tim Barnett;Sean Dwyer;Ken Chadwick

  • An Exploratory Study of Family Member Characteristics and Involvement: Effects on Entrepreneurial Behavior in the Family Firm

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Tim Barnett;Allison Pearson

  • Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing

    Tim Barnett;Ken Bass;Gene Brown

  • Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process

    Jerry Bryan Fuller;Kim Hester;Tim Barnett;Len Frey

  • Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm:

    Tim Barnett;Franz W. Kellermanns

  • Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business

    Tim Barnett;Ken Bass;Gene Brown

  • Ethics Code Awareness, Perceived Ethical Values, and Organizational Commitment

    Sean Valentine;Tim Barnett

  • The Moderating Effect of Individuals' Perceptions of Ethical Work Climate on Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions

    Tim Barnett;Cheryl Vaicys

  • A Social Identity Perspective on the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Commitment

    J. Bryan Fuller;Tim Barnett;Kim Hester;Clint Relyea

  • Issue contingencies and marketers' recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions

    Tim Barnett;Sean Valentine

  • Individual Difference Variables, Ethical Judgments, and Ethical Behavioral Intentions

    Kenneth Bass;Tim Barnett;Gene Brown

  • Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology

    Tim Barnett;Allison W. Pearson;Rodney A. Pearson;Franz W. Kellermanns

  • Perceived organizational support and perceived external prestige: predicting organizational attachment for university faculty, staff, and administrators

    J Bryan Fuller;Kim Hester;Tim Barnett;Len Frey

  • Ethics codes and sales professionals' perceptions of their organizations' ethical values

    Sean Valentine;Tim Barnett

  • The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image

    Esra Memili;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns;Thomas M. Zellweger

  • An exploratory examination of voice behavior from an impression management perspective.

    Jerry Bryan Fuller;Tim Barnett;Kim Hester;Clint Relyea

  • New Venture and Family Business Teams: Understanding Team Formation, Composition, Behaviors, and Performance:

    Leon Schjoedt;Erik Monsen;Allison Pearson;Tim Barnett

  • Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study

    Tim Barnett

  • Ethical ideology and the ethical judgments of marketing professionals

    Tim Barnett;Ken Bass;Gene Brown;Frederic J. Hebert

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz W. Kellermanns
Franz W. Kellermanns University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Allison W. Pearson
Allison W. Pearson Mississippi State University
Sean Valentine
Sean Valentine University of North Dakota
Esra Memili
Esra Memili University of North Carolina at Greensboro
James J. Chrisman
James J. Chrisman Mississippi State University
Kimberly A. Eddleston
Kimberly A. Eddleston Northeastern University
Thomas Zellweger
Thomas Zellweger University of St. Gallen
Orlando C. Richard
Orlando C. Richard The University of Texas at Dallas
Jon C. Carr
Jon C. Carr North Carolina State University
Jess H. Chua
Jess H. Chua University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a diverse array of online degree options tailored for flexibility and career advancement. Many students are opting for accelerated paths to further their education while balancing personal and professional commitments.

For those interested in mental health and behavioral sciences, an online masters degree psychology program offers an affordable way to gain advanced skills that fuel careers in counseling, research, or human services. If you are seeking to move quickly into professional roles, a masters degree online can be completed in as little as one year, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

Educators and administrators can consider a edd online degree, designed for rapid professional development in educational leadership. For undergraduate students, an online accelerated bachelor's degree can help fast-track entry into fields like sociology, political science, or communications.

Each of these pathways provides a convenient and adaptable route for building a rewarding career in the rich landscape of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Barnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles