World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kimberly A. Eddleston

Kimberly A. Eddleston

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 56 687 631 304 273 251 17983

Kimberly A. Eddleston publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kimberly A. Eddleston between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimberly A. Eddleston published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 26 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 9 publications
1999 2025

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kimberly A. Eddleston: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 4
2005 1
2006 7
2007 4
2008 6
2009 3
2010 5
2011 4
2012 12
2013 6
2014 8
2015 22
2016 10
2017 11
2018 17
2019 20
2020 28
2021 23
2022 19
2023 27
2024 17
2025 9
Total 267
Download as CSV

Kimberly A. Eddleston publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Eddleston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 250–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 251 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23 251
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Kimberly A. Eddleston D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Eddleston sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40 56
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Kimberly A. Eddleston is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States and specializes in research within the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their scholarly output includes significant contributions to organizational behavior, innovation management, accounting, sociology, political science, and strategic management. The main topics addressed in their work focus primarily on family business performance and succession, entrepreneurship studies and influences, corporate finance and governance, as well as international business and foreign direct investment.

Eddleston's research has resulted in numerous publications across prominent academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include the Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Family Business Strategy, SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Management Studies, and Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

Their recent papers explore various aspects of family firms, entrepreneurship, and organizational behavior. Notable recent works include:

  • "Entrepreneurial by Design: How Organizational Design Affects Family and Non-family Firms' Opportunity Exploitation" (2020, Journal of Management Studies)
  • "Catalyzing change: Innovation in women's entrepreneurship" (2022, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal)
  • "Kinship and Gender in Family Firms: New Insights Into Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior" (2021, Family Business Review)
  • "Parenting the Successor: It Starts at Home and Leaves an Enduring Impact on the Family Business" (2022, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice)
  • "Employee Incentives and Family Firm Innovation: A Configurational Approach" (2023, Journal of Management)

Eddleston frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include Francesco Chirico, Franz W. Kellermanns, Alfredo De Massis, Massimo Baù, and Philipp Sieger.

The main fields of study they contribute to are:

  • Business, Management and Accounting

With subfields covering:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

The primary topics in their research output include:

  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • International Business and FDI
  • Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Best Publications

  • Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective ☆

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Franz W. Kellermanns

  • Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity

    Thomas M. Zellweger;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns

  • Feuding Families: When Conflict Does a Family Firm Good

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • An Exploratory Study of Family Member Characteristics and Involvement: Effects on Entrepreneurial Behavior in the Family Firm

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Tim Barnett;Allison Pearson

  • Moderators of the Relationship Between Work-Family Conflict and Career Satisfaction

    Luis L. Martins;Kimberly A. Eddleston;John F. "Jack" Veiga

  • Resource Configuration in Family Firms: Linking Resources, Strategic Planning and Technological Opportunities to Performance

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Franz Willi Kellermanns;Ravi Sarathy

  • Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Family Perspective

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • Why Networks Enhance the Progress of New Venture Creation: The Influence of Social Capital and Cognition

    Donna Marie De Carolis;Barrie E. Litzky;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: Do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes? ☆

    Gary N. Powell;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • Innovativeness in family firms: a family influence perspective

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Ravi Sarathy;Fran Murphy

  • The Good, the Bad, and the Misguided: How Managers Inadvertently Encourage Deviant Behaviors

    Barrie E. Litzky;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Deborah L. Kidder

  • Extending the Socioemotional Wealth Perspective: A Look at the Dark Side

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Thomas M. Zellweger

  • Nurturing Entrepreneurs' Work–Family Balance: A Gendered Perspective

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Gary N. Powell

  • The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners' career satisfier preferences

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Gary N. Powell

  • Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of Family Firms: Does the Stewardship Perspective Explain Differences?:

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Franz W. Kellermanns;Thomas M. Zellweger

  • Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their family ties

    Thomas M. Zellweger;Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston;Esra Memili

  • A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance

    Franz W. Kellermanns;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures

    Kimberly A. Eddleston;Jamie J. Ladge;Cheryl Mitteness;Lakshmi Balachandra

  • Don’t Pitch Like a Girl!: How Gender Stereotypes Influence Investor Decisions

    Lakshmi Balachandra;Tony Briggs;Kim Eddleston;Candida Brush

  • A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact

    Sophie Bacq;Kimberly A. Eddleston

  • Home-region focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs non-family leaders

    Elitsa R Banalieva;Kimberly A Eddleston

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz W. Kellermanns
Franz W. Kellermanns University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Gary N. Powell
Gary N. Powell University of Connecticut
Thomas Zellweger
Thomas Zellweger University of St. Gallen
John F. Veiga
John F. Veiga University of Connecticut
P. Devereaux Jennings
P. Devereaux Jennings University of Alberta
Mike Wright
Mike Wright Imperial College London
Tim Barnett
Tim Barnett Mississippi State University
Alain Verbeke
Alain Verbeke University of Calgary
Esra Memili
Esra Memili University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis Free University of Bozen-Bolzano

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can expand your career options in business and management. Many U.S. universities now offer flexible programs, including fast track program options that let you complete your studies more quickly. These accelerated degrees are ideal for professionals looking to boost their qualifications without spending years in school.

If affordability is a priority, consider programs from the online college business degree list, which spotlight accessible options from accredited institutions. Lower tuition costs and online flexibility make it easier to earn your degree while managing other responsibilities.

For those interested in the healthcare sector, a healthcare administration degree cost comparison can help you plan your educational budget. The field is also growing rapidly, offering excellent job prospects and diverse career pathways.

Professionals wishing to advance further may consider a masters in healthcare administration, an affordable way to access leadership roles and specialized positions. Online business and healthcare administration degrees can unlock varied roles, from management and finance to healthcare operations and consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly A. Eddleston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles