World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 95 66 62 33 31 230 48303

James J. Chrisman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James J. Chrisman between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James J. Chrisman published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 15 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James J. Chrisman: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 3
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 2
1985 4
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 7
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 4
2003 11
2004 8
2005 4
2006 5
2007 6
2008 12
2009 7
2010 8
2011 11
2012 16
2013 12
2014 9
2015 7
2016 9
2017 8
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 10
2022 6
2023 4
2024 6
2025 9
Total 245
Download as CSV

James J. Chrisman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Chrisman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 230–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 230 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25 230
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

James J. Chrisman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. Chrisman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 89+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award

Overview

James J. Chrisman is affiliated with Mississippi State University in the United States. The primary focus of their research lies within the broad field of Business, Management, and Accounting, with a particular emphasis on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Accounting. Additional areas of study include Sociology and Political Science as well as Business and International Management.

The scientist's research extensively covers key topics such as Family Business Performance and Succession, Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, and Corporate Finance and Governance. Other areas of interest include Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, Innovation and Knowledge Management, and Marriage and Sexual Relationships.

James J. Chrisman has contributed scholarly work to several academic journals and proceedings. Frequent publication venues include Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Proceedings, Family Business Review, Small Business Economics, and the Journal of Small Business Management.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward, 2021, Family Business Review
  • Narrow-Framing and Risk Preferences in Family and Non-Family Firms, 2020, Journal of Management Studies
  • Social network research in the family business literature: a review and integration, 2022, Small Business Economics
  • Strategic Persistence in Family Business, 2021, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Family business research in Asia: review and future directions, 2021, Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Collaboration is an important aspect of their academic work. Frequent co-authors include Hanqing Fang, Vitaliy Skorodziyevskiy, Esra Memili, Zhenyu Wu, and Joshua J. Daspit. This indicates active engagement in multidisciplinary and team-based research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Defining the Family Business by Behavior

    Jess H. Chua;James J. Chrisman;Pramodita Sharma

  • Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship

    Pramodita Sharma;James J. Chrisman

  • Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Pramodita Sharma

  • Strategic Management of the Family Business: Past Research and Future Challenges

    Pramodita Sharma;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua

  • Toward a Theory of Community-Based Enterprise

    Ana María Peredo;James J. Chrisman

  • Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non‐Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Reginald A. Litz

  • Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family‐Centered Non‐Economic Goals in Small Firms

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Allison W. Pearson;Tim Barnett

  • Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives

    James J. Chrisman;Pankaj C. Patel

  • Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control

    Thomas M. Zellweger;Franz W. Kellermanns;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua

  • Factors Preventing Intra-Family Succession

    Alfredo Vittorio De Massis;Jess H. Chua;James J. Chrisman

  • Sources of Heterogeneity in Family Firms: An Introduction

    Jess H. Chua;James J. Chrisman;Lloyd P. Steier;Sabine B. Rau

  • The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model:

    James J. Chrisman;Alan Bauerschmidt;Charles W. Hofer

  • Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical Results

    Pramodita Sharma;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua

  • Determinants of Initial Satisfaction with the Succession Process in Family Firms: A Conceptual Model

    Pramodita Sharma;James J. Chrisman;Amy L. Pablo;Jess H. Chua

  • Succession and Nonsuccession Concerns of Family Firms and Agency Relationship with Nonfamily Managers

    Jess H. Chua;James J. Chrisman;Pramodita Sharma

  • Important Attributes of Successors in Family Businesses: An Exploratory Study:

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Pramodita Sharma

  • A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration

    James J. Chrisman;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Reginald Litz;Reginald Litz

  • Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms

    Pramodita Sharma;James J. Chrisman;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua

  • Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms

    James J. Chrisman;James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Franz W. Kellermanns;Erick P.C. Chang

  • The Adolescence of Family Firm Research Taking Stock and Planning for the Future

    Eric R. Gedajlovic;Michael Carney;James J. Chrisman;James J. Chrisman;Franz W. Kellermanns;Franz W. Kellermanns

  • The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation

    James J. Chrisman;Jess H. Chua;Alfredo De Massis;Federico Frattini

Frequent Co-Authors

Jess H. Chua
Jess H. Chua University of Calgary
Pramodita Sharma
Pramodita Sharma University of Vermont
Franz W. Kellermanns
Franz W. Kellermanns University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Esra Memili
Esra Memili University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis
Alfredo Vittorio De Massis Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Lloyd P. Steier
Lloyd P. Steier University of Alberta
Josip Kotlar
Josip Kotlar Polytechnic University of Milan
Allison W. Pearson
Allison W. Pearson Mississippi State University
Thomas Zellweger
Thomas Zellweger University of St. Gallen
Tim Barnett
Tim Barnett Mississippi State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Business and Management is vast, offering diverse pathways to suit various interests and career ambitions. Many students opt for online degrees, which provide greater flexibility and access to high-quality programs from anywhere in the world. Selecting one of the best online colleges ensures your education meets rigorous standards for accreditation and quality.

Specialized online degrees are available in fields such as construction management and healthcare administration. For those interested in project oversight and infrastructure, an online degree in construction management can open doors to leadership roles within the construction industry. Alternatively, if your interests align with the fast-paced world of healthcare, healthcare administration programs are tailored for those aiming to manage hospitals, clinics, or health organizations.

For advanced leadership roles, pursuing an organizational leadership PhD can help you develop research skills and strategic expertise to lead complex business environments. Exploring these related degrees and career pathways can help you identify the right program to advance your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing James J. Chrisman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles